Skip to main content

Abstract

Theory and experiments are complementary ways to analyze optimization algorithms. Experiments can also live a life of their own and produce learning without need to follow or test a theory. Yet, in order to make conclusions based on experiments trustworthy, reliable, and objective a systematic methodology is needed. In the natural sciences, this methodology relies on the mathematical framework of statistics. This book collects the results of recent research that focused on the application of statistical principles to the specific task of analyzing optimization algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ackermann R (1989) The new experimentalism. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40:185–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartz-Beielstein T (2006) Experimental Research in Evolutionary Computation— The New Experimentalism. Natural Computing Series, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartz-Beielstein T (2008) How experimental algorithmics can benefit from Mayo’s extensions to Neyman-Pearson theory of testing.Synthese 163(3):385–396, DOI 10.1007/s11229-007-9297-z

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Birattari M (2005) Tuning Metaheuristics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Burke EK, Gendreau M, Gendron B, Rousseau LM (eds) (2008) Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on the Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling, PATAT 2008, Université de Montréal, Montreal, CA, available online: https://symposia.cirrelt.ca/PATAT2008/en/ Proceedings

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers AF (1999) What Is This Thing Called Science. University of Queensland Press, St. Lucia, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorigo M, Stützle T (2004) Ant Colony Optimization. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Golden B, Raghavan S, Wasil E (eds) (2008) The Vehicle Routing Problem: Latest Advances and New Challenges, Operations Research/Computer Science Interfaces Series, vol 43. Springer

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hacking I (2001) An Introduction to Probability and Inductive Logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hooker J (1996) Testing heuristics: We have it all wrong. Journal of Heuristics 1(1):33–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DS (2002) A theoretician’s guide to the experimental analysis of algorithms. In: Goldwasser MH, Johnson DS, McGeoch CC (eds) Data Structures, Near Neighbor Searches, and Methodology: Fifth and Sixth DIMACS Implementation Challenges, DIMACS Series in Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science, vol 59, American Mathematical Society, pp 215–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt D, Vecchi MP (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220(4598):671–680

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mayo DG (1983) An objective theory of statistical testing. Synthese 57:297–340

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mayo DG (1996) Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago IL

    Google Scholar 

  • McGeoch CC (1996) Toward an experimental method for algorithm simulation. INFORMS Journal on Computing 8(1):1–15, (this journal issue contains also com1 mentaries by Pierre L’Ecuyer, James B. Orlin and Douglas R. Shier, and a rejoinder by C. McGeoch)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Motwani R, Raghavan P (1995) Randomized Algorithms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schwefel HP (1995) Evolution and Optimum Seeking. Sixth-Generation Computer Technology, Wiley, New York NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hentenryck P, Michel L (2005) Constraint-Based Local Search. The MIT Press, Cambridge, USA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Thomas Bartz-Beielstein , Marco Chiarandini , Luís Paquete or Mike Preuss .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bartz-Beielstein, T., Chiarandini, M., Paquete, L., Preuss, M. (2010). Introduction. In: Bartz-Beielstein, T., Chiarandini, M., Paquete, L., Preuss, M. (eds) Experimental Methods for the Analysis of Optimization Algorithms. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02538-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02538-9_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02537-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02538-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics