Does Social Interaction Activate Music Listeners?

  • Leen De Bruyn
  • Marc Leman
  • Dirk Moelants
  • Michiel Demey
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5493)

Abstract

Over the last years, embodiment has gained a lot of interest in the field of music research. Researchers began to focus on the study of body movements and gestures in relationship with music. In the study presented here, we empirically quantified the impact of social interaction on movements made by groups of subjects listening and moving to music. Both children (average age 9) and adolescents (average age 16) were tested. The methodology was based on motion capturing using wireless Wii Nintendo Remote sensors, and subsequent statistical analysis. Participants were asked to move along with the beat of the music in two conditions: Individual, without social contact, and in groups of four, encouraging social interaction. Data analysis shows that the influence of the social environment has an effect that can be measured and quantified. In general, the social context stimulates participants to move more intensively to the music. Furthermore, adolescent participants even show a significantly improved synchronization with the beat of the music in the social condition, illustrating social facilitation.

Keywords

Music Embodiment Synchronization Social interaction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Leman, M.: Embodied Music Cognition and Mediation Technology. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Varela, F.J., Thompson, E., Rosch, E.: The Embodied Mind. In: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1991)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gallagher, S., Cole, J.: Body Schema and Body Image in a Deafferented Subject. J. Mind Behav. 16, 369–390 (1995)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Truslit, A.: Gestaltung und Bewegung in der Musik. Chr. Friedrich Vieweg, Berlin-Lichterfelde (1938)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Becking, G.: Der Musikalische Rhythmus als Erkenntnisquelle. Ichthys Verlag, Stuttgart (1958)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clynes, M.: Sentics, the touch of emotions. Doubleday Anchor, New York (1977)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Camurri, A., Castellano, G., Cowie, R., Glowinski, D., Knapp, B., Krumhansl, C.L., Villon, O., Volpe, G.: The Premio Paganini Experiment: a multimodal gesture-based approach for explaining emotional processes in music performance. In: 7th International Workshop on Gesture in Human-Computer Interaction and Simulation, Lisbon (May 2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wanderley, M., Battier, M. (eds.): Trends in Gestural Control of Music. Ircam-Centre Pompidou (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dahl, S., Grossbach, M., Altenmuller, E.: Influence of Movement and Grip on Perceptual and Measured Tone Quality in Drumming. In: 10th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition, Sapporo, Japan (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thompson, M., Luck, G.: Effect of Pianists’ Expressive Intention on Amount and Type of Body Movement. In: 10th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition, Sapporo, Japan (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Clayton, M., Sager, R., Will, U.: In time with the music: The concept of entrainment and its significance for ethnomusicology. In: ESEM Counterpoint I (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kern, P., Aldridge, D.: Using embedded music therapy interventions to support outdoor play of young children with autism in an inclusive community-based child care program. J. Mus. Ther. 43, 4 (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nayak, S., Wheeler, B., Shiflett, S., Agostinelli, S.: Effect of Music Therapy on Mood and Social Interaction among individuals with acute and traumatic brain injury and stroke. Rehab. Psych. 45(3), 274–283 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    DeNora, T.: Music in everyday life. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kiraly, Z.: Solfeggio 1: A Vertical Ear Training Instruction Assisted by the Computer. Int. J. Music Educ., 40–41 (2003)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    McNeill, W.H.: Keeping together in time: Dance and Drill in Human History. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1995)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Néda, Z., Ravasz, E., Brechet, Y., Vicsek, T., Barabasi, A.L.: The sound of many hands clapping: Tumultuous applause can transform itself into waves of synchronized clapping. Nature 403, 849–850 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Demey, M., Leman, M., Bossuyt, F., Vanfleteren, J.: The Musical Synchrotron: Using wireless motion sensors to study how social interaction affects synchronization with musical tempo. In: 8th International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, Genova, Italy, pp. 372–373 (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Oullier, O., de Guzman, G.C., Jantzen, K.J., Lagarde, J., Kelso, J.A.S.: Social coordination dynamics: Measuring human bonding. Soc. Neur. 3(2), 178–192 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Desmet, F., De Bruyn, L., Leman, M., Lesaffre, M.: Statistical analysis of human body movement and group interactions in response to music. In: 32nd Annual Conference of the German Classification Society, Hamburg, Germany (2008) (submitted) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leen De Bruyn
    • 1
  • Marc Leman
    • 1
  • Dirk Moelants
    • 1
  • Michiel Demey
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Musicology – IPEMGhent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations