KSQuant - Complex Score Manipulation in PWGL through Quantization

  • Kilian Sprotte
  • Mikael Laurson
  • Mika Kuuskankare
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5493)

Abstract

This paper presents the recent developments dealing with our metrical score representation format and how it can be used to produce and manipulate musical scores in PWGL. The base of these ideas is a special score format, called ENP-score-notation, that allows to describe in textual form various score elements like beats, measures, voices and parts. This basic format can be extended using keywords to represent other score attributes such as pitch, enharmonics, expressions, and so on, resulting in complete scores. A novel PWGL library, KSQuant, uses a similar format: instead of the tree-based representation of the metric structure, KSQuant uses a flat onset-time representation. This format is ideal for many types of score manipulation operations where it is essential to preserve all score attributes.

Keywords

score manipulation quantization computer-aided composition 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sprotte, K.: KSQuant, a library for score manipulation and quantization (2008), http://kiliansprotte.de/ksquant/
  2. 2.
    Taupin, D., Mitchell, R., Egler, A.: MusiXTeX (2003), http://directory.fsf.org/MusiXTex.html
  3. 3.
    Good, M., Actor, G.: Using MusicXML for File Interchange. In: Third International Conference on WEB Delivering of Music, p. 153. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Laurson, M.: PATCHWORK: A Visual Programming Language and some Musical Applications. Studia musica no. 6, doctoral dissertation, Sibelius Academy, Helsinki (1996)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Assayag, G., Rueda, C., Laurson, M., Agon, C., Delerue, O.: Computer Assisted Composition at IRCAM: From PatchWork to OpenMusic. Computer Music Journal 23(3), 59–72 (Fall 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Laurson, M., Kuuskankare, M.: Recent Trends in PWGL. In: International Computer Music Conference, New Orleans, USA, pp. 258–261 (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kuuskankare, M., Laurson, M.: Expressive Notation Package. Computer Music Journal 30(4), 67–79 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cemgil, A.T., Desain, P., Kappen, B.: Rhythm Quantization for Transcription. In: Proceedings of the AISB 1999 Symposium on Musical Creativity, pp. 64–69 (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Agon, C., Assayag, G., Fineberg, J., Rueda, C.: Kant: A critique of pure quantification. In: Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference, Aarhus, Denmark, pp. 52–59 (1994)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sibelius music notation software, http://www.sibelius.com/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kilian Sprotte
    • 1
  • Mikael Laurson
    • 2
  • Mika Kuuskankare
    • 2
  1. 1.MKTTU BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Center for Music and TechnologySibelius AcademyHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations