Interval Distinction on Melody Perception for Music Information Retrieval

  • Cihan Isikhan
  • Adil Alpkocak
  • Yetkin Ozer
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5493)

Abstract

The problem of musical query processing can be envisioned as a substring- matching problem when the melody is represented as a sequence of notes associated with a set of attributes. In comparison of two musical sequences, one of the important problems is to determine the weights of each operation. This paper presents an alternate weighting-scheme which is based on diatonic distinctions on melody perception. To achieve this, we run a cognitive experimentation applying Probe-Tone method. The results showed that perceptional hierarchy of pitches changes according to the interval distinction on melody, whether it has more disjunt interval than conjunct intervals, vice versa. Consequently, if the new weighting-scheme created in this study are used in sequenced- based melody comparison, melodies retrieved to user would have a more credible ranking. The details of experimentations and the results we reach are also presented in detail.

Keywords

Music Perception Pitch Hierarchy Melody Comparison Music Information Retrieval 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Garay, A.: Evaluating text-based similarity measures for musical content. In: Second International Conference on WEB Delivering of Music, p. 2. Darmstadt, Germany (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grachten, M., Arcos, J.L., M´antaras, R.L.: Melodic Similarity: Looking for a Good Abstraction Level. In: 5th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR), Barcelona, Spain (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mongeau, M., Sankoff, D.: Comparison of Musical Sequences. Computers and the Humanities 24, 161–175 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Krumhansl, C.L.: Cognitive Foundations of Musical Pitch. Oxford University Press, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Deutsch, D.: The Processing of Pitch Combinations. In: The Psychology of Music. Academic Press, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lerdahl, F., Jackendoff, R.: A Generative Theory of Tonal Music. MIT Press, Cambridge (1983)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Meyer, L.B.: Emotion and Meaning in Music. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1956)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schenker, H.: Neue Musikalische Theorien und Phantasien: Der Freie Satz, Universal Edition, Vienna (1956)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Narmour, E.: The Analysis and Cognition of Basic Melodic Structures. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1990)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    McNab, R.J., Smith, L.A., Bainbridge, D., Witten, I.H.: The New Zealand Digital Library MELody inDEX. D-Lib Magazine 3(5) (1997)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hoos, H.H., Hamel, K.: GUIDO music notation: Specification Part I, Basic GUIDO. Technical Report TI 20/97, Technische Universität Darmstadt (1997)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ghias, A., Logan, J., Chamberlin, D., Smith, B.C.: Query by humming: Musical information retrieval in an audio database. In: Proceedings of the ACM International Multimedia Conference & Exhibition, pp. 231–236 (1995)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Uitdenbogerd, A.L., Zobel, J.: Matching techniques for large music databases. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM International Multimedia Conference, pp. 57–66 (1999)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Droettboom, M., Fujianga, I., MacMillan, K., Patton, M., Warner, J., Choudhury, G.S.: Expressive and efficient retrieval of symbolic music data. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Annual International Symposium on Music Information Retrieval, pp. 173–178 (2001)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sapp, C.S., Liu, Y.-W., Field, E.S.: Search Effectiveness Measures for Symbolic Music Queries in Very Large Databases. In: International Symposium on Music Information Retrieval, p. 11 (2004); Hoos, H.H., Hamel, K.: GUIDO music notation: Specification Part I, Basic GUIDO. Technical Report TI 20/97, Technische Universität Darmstadt (1997)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Downie, S., Nelson, M.: Evaluation of a simple and effective music information retrieval method. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 73–80 (2000)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lemstrom, K.: String Matching Techniques for Music Retrieval. Ph.D thesis, University of Helsinki, Department of Computer Science (2000)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lemstrom, K., Tarhio, J.: Transposition invariant pattern matching for multi-track strings. Nordic Journal of Computing 10, 185–205 (2003)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vurma, A., Ross, J.: Production and Perception of Musical Intervals. Music Perception 23(4), 331–345 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cihan Isikhan
    • 1
  • Adil Alpkocak
    • 2
  • Yetkin Ozer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MusicologyDokuz Eylul UniversityBalcovaTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Computer EngineeringDokuz Eylul UniversityTinaztepeTurkey

Personalised recommendations