Non-rigid Image Registration with Uniform Spherical Structure Patterns
- 2 Citations
- 2.5k Downloads
Abstract
Non-rigid image registration is a challenging task in medical image analysis. In recent years, there are two essential issues. First, intensity similarity is not necessarily equivalent to anatomical similarity when the anatomical correspondences between subject and template images are established. Second, the registration algorithm should be robust against monotonic gray-level transformation when aligning anatomical structures in the presence of bias fields. In this paper, a new feature based non-rigid registration method is proposed to deal with these two problems. The proposed method is based on a new type of image feature, called Uniform Spherical Structure Pattern (USSP). USSP encodes voxel-wise interaction information and geometric properties of anatomical structures. It is computationally efficient, rotation invariant and theoretically monotonic gray-level transformation invariant. The USSP feature is integrated with the Markov random field (MRF) discrete labeling framework to define energy function for registration in this paper. If the segmentation results are available, explicit anatomical correspondence can be established as an additional energy term. The energy function is optimized via the alpha-expansion algorithms. The proposed method is compared with three widely used non-rigid registration methods on both simulated and real databases obtained from BrainWeb and IBSR. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method achieves the highest registration accuracy among all the compared methods.
Keywords
Input Image Segmentation Result Local Binary Pattern Markov Random Field Template ImagePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Rohr, K.: Image registration based on thin plate splines and local estimates of anisotropic landmark localization uncertainties. In: Wells, W.M., Colchester, A.C.F., Delp, S.L. (eds.) MICCAI 1998. LNCS, vol. 1496, pp. 1174–1183. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Thompson, P., Toga, A.: A surface-based technique for warping three-dimensional images of the brain. TMI 15, 402–417 (1996)Google Scholar
- 3.Rueckert, D., Sonoda, L., et al.: Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: Application to breast MR images. TMI 18, 712–721 (1999)Google Scholar
- 4.Thirion, J.: Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with maxwell’s demons. MedI. A 2, 243–260 (1998)Google Scholar
- 5.Tu, Z., Narr, K., et al.: Brain anatomical structure segmentation by hybrid discriminative/generative models. TMI 27, 495–508 (2007)Google Scholar
- 6.Dirk, L., et al.: Nonrigid image registration using conditional mutual information. In: Karssemeijer, N., Lelieveldt, B. (eds.) IPMI 2007. LNCS, vol. 4584, pp. 725–737. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Tang, W., Chung, A.: Non-rigid image registration using graph-cuts. In: Ayache, N., Ourselin, S., Maeder, A. (eds.) MICCAI 2007, Part I. LNCS, vol. 4791, pp. 916–924. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Glocker, B., et al.: Inter and intra-modal deformable registration: Continuous deformations meet efficient optimal linear programming. In: Karssemeijer, N., Lelieveldt, B. (eds.) IPMI 2007. LNCS, vol. 4584, pp. 408–420. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Yershova, A., LaValle, S.: Deterministic sampling methods for spheres and so(3). In: ICRA, pp. 3974–3980 (2004)Google Scholar
- 10.Ojala, T., Pietikainen, M., Maenpaa, T.: Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns. PAMI 24, 971–987 (2002)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 11.Shen, D., Davatzikos, C.: HAMMER: Hierarchical attribute matching mechanism for elastic registration. TMI 21, 1421–1439 (2002)Google Scholar
- 12.Wu, G., Qi, F., Shen, D.: Learning-based deformable registration of mr brain images. TMI 25, 1145–1157 (2006)Google Scholar
- 13.Fisher, A.: The Mathematical Theory of Probabilities. Macmillan, Basingstoke (1923)Google Scholar
- 14.Kruizinga, P., Petkov, N.: Nonlinear operator for oriented texture. TIP 8, 1395–1407 (1999)Google Scholar
- 15.Yuri, B., Olga, V., Ramin, Z.: Fast approximate energy minimization via graph cuts. PAMI 23, 1222–1239 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Crum, W., Rueckert, D., et al.: A framework for detailed objective comparison of non-rigid registration algorithms in neuroimaging. In: Barillot, C., Haynor, D.R., Hellier, P. (eds.) MICCAI 2004. LNCS, vol. 3216, pp. 679–686. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar