Skip to main content

The Difference between Single-Valued and Multi-Valued Cases in the Compact Representation of CPD in Bayesian Networks

  • Conference paper
Complex Sciences (Complex 2009)

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1099 Accesses

Abstract

This paper addresses an important issue about the compact representation of the conditional probability distribution (CPD) applied in the well known Bayesian Networks in uncertain causality representation and probabilistic inference. That is, there is an essential difference between the single-valued cases and the multi-valued cases, while this difference does not exist when the CPD is represented in the conditional probability table (CPT). In other words, the present compact representation and inference methods applicable in the single-valued cases may not be applicable in the multi-valued cases as people usually think. A detailed example is provided to illustrate this problem. The solution is provided in the references by the author.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Pearl, J.: Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Boutilier, C., Friedman, N., Goldszmidt, M., Koller, D.: Context-specific independence in Bayesian Network. In: Proc. of UAI 1996 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang, Q.: Probabilistic reasoning based on dynamic causality trees/diagrams. Reliability Engineering and System Safety (46), 209–220 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Poole, D., Zhang, N.L.: Exploiting contextual independence in probabilistic inference. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 18, 263–313 (2003)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. D’Ambrosio, B.: Local expression languages for probabilistic dependence. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 139(1), 61–68 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang, Q.: DUCG - a new approach to deal with dynamical uncertain causality information - part I: the static discrete DAG case. Submitted for publication in IEEE Trans. System, Man and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Human

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, Q.: DUCG - a new approach to deal with dynamical uncertain causality information - part II: the dynamical DCG case. Submitted for publication in IEEE Trans. System, Man and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Human

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang, Q.: DUCG - a new approach to deal with dynamical uncertain causality information - part III: the discrete dynamical case. Submitted for publication in IEEE Trans. System, Man and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Human

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang, Q.: DUCG - a new approach to deal with dynamical uncertain causality information - part IV: The Continuous Variable and Uncertain Evidence. Submitted for publication in IEEE Trans. System, Man and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Human

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang, Q.: An application of DUCG – The dynamical fault diagnoses and predictions of a nuclear power plant. Submitted for publication in IEEE Trans. System, Man and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Human

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 ICST Institute for Computer Science, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zhang, Q. (2009). The Difference between Single-Valued and Multi-Valued Cases in the Compact Representation of CPD in Bayesian Networks. In: Zhou, J. (eds) Complex Sciences. Complex 2009. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 4. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02466-5_58

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02466-5_58

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02465-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02466-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics