Skip to main content

How Power Mechanism Influence Channel Bilateral Opportunism

  • Conference paper
Cutting-Edge Research Topics on Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM 2009)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 35))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2064 Accesses

Abstract

In the background of marketing channel power asymmetry structure, this article discuss the relation between power dominant member’s use of power mechanism and the opportunism behavior of both Power disadvantage member and the power dominant member itself, and test whether distributive fairness perception and procedural fairness perception have moderate effects on this relation. The result shows that, the power dominant member’s use of coercive power will increase the opportunistic tendency of both sides; in contrast, the power dominant member’s use of noncorecive power will inhibit such tendency. Distributive fairness perception and procedural fairness perception negatively moderate the relation between power dominant member’s use of noncorecive power and power disadvantage member’s opportunism. Procedural fairness perception also negatively moderates the relation between power dominant member’s use of coercive power and the other side’s opportunism.

This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (# 70872117).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kim, S.K., Wang, S.: Linear Contracts and the Double Moral-Hazard. Journal of Economic Theory 82(2), 342–378 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Kumar, N.: The power of power in supplier-retailer relationships. Industrial Marketing Management 34, 863–866 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kumar, N., Scheer, L., et al.: The Effects of Supplier Fairness on Vulnerable Resellers. Journal of Marketing research XXX II, 54–65 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Skinner, S.J., Gassenhelmer, J.B., et al.: Cooperation in supplier-dealer relations. Journal of Retailing 68(2), 174–193 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wathne, K.H., Heide, J.B.: Opportunism in interfirm relationships: Forms, outcomes, and solutions. Journal of Marketing 64(4), 36–51 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wuyts, Stefan, et al.: The formation of buyer-supplier relationships: Detailed contract drafting and close partner selection. Journal of Marketing 69(4), 103–117 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tian, Y., Chen, S. (2009). How Power Mechanism Influence Channel Bilateral Opportunism. In: Shi, Y., Wang, S., Peng, Y., Li, J., Zeng, Y. (eds) Cutting-Edge Research Topics on Multiple Criteria Decision Making. MCDM 2009. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 35. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02298-2_103

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02298-2_103

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02297-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02298-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics