Narcissus: Group and Individual Models to Support Small Group Work

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5535)


Long term group work by small teams is a central part of many learning and workplace activities. Widespread group support tools such as wikis, version control systems and issue tracking systems are an invaluable aid for groups. They also have the potential to provide evidence for valuable models of the group activity. This paper describes Narcissus, designed as a new way to improve group-work by exploiting evidence from use of such group-work tools, to create a visual presentation of a group model. The Narcissus models and interfaces were designed to help groups function more effectively. It helps individuals see how well they are contributing to the group. It enables groups to assess contributions relative to plans. And it helps facilitators identify problems. The Narcissus interface supports scrutability and control over its models. We report a four part evaluation of Narcissus: individual level with 23 students; group level by 5 groups; facilitator level with 5 facilitators; and fine grained study with 8 students. Results indicate that all these groups were able to understand and use Narcissus and that they considered it effective in modelling the group activity in useful ways. They particularly valued the support for scrutability. Key contributions of this work are the creation of a scrutable and user controlled group model to support group work and to provide a new form of navigation interface for a complex groupware site.


Group Model Project View Group View Version Control System Information Panel 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Donath, J.: A semantic approach to visualizing online conversations. Communications of the ACM 45(4), 45–49 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Drury, H., Kay, J., Losberg, W.: Student satisfaction with groupwork in undergraduate computer science: Do things get better? In: ACE 2003: Proceedings of the fifth Australasian conference on Computing education, pp. 77–85. Australian Computer Society, Inc., Darlinghurst (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Edgewall Software. The Trac Project (2008), (verified, 2008-02-01)
  4. 4.
    Erickson, T., Kellogg, W.A.: Social translucence: an approach to designing systems that support social processes. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 7(1), 59–83 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gilbert, E., Karahalios, K.: CodeSaw: A social visualization of distributed software development. In: Baranauskas, C., Palanque, P., Abascal, J., Barbosa, S.D.J. (eds.) INTERACT 2007. LNCS, vol. 4663, pp. 303–316. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T.: Positive Interdependence: Key to Effective Cooperation. In: Interaction in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning, p. 174 (1992)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kay, J., Maisonneuve, N., Yacef, K., Reimann, P.: The big five and visualisations of team work activity. In: Ikeda, M., Ashley, K.D., Chan, T.-W. (eds.) ITS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4053, pp. 197–206. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kay, J., Maisonneuve, N., Yacef, K., Reimann, P.: Wattle tree: What’ll it tell us? Technical Report 582, The University of Sydney (January 2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Likert, R.: A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology 140, 55 (1932)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Salas, E., Sims, D.E., Burke, C.S.: Is there a “Big Five” in Teamwork? Small Group Research 36(5), 555–599 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Slavin, R.E.: Cooperative learning: theory, research and practice. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1990)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Soller, A.L.: Supporting social interaction in an intelligent collaborative learning system. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 12(1), 40–62 (2001)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Xiong, R., Donath, J.: Peoplegarden: Creating data portraits for users. In: UIST 1999: Proceedings of the 12th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, pp. 37–44. ACM Press, New York (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Information TechnologiesUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations