Automatic Quantification of Fluorescence from Clustered Targets in Microscope Images

  • Harri Pölönen
  • Jussi Tohka
  • Ulla Ruotsalainen
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5575)


A cluster of fluorescent targets appears as overlapping spots in microscope images. By quantifying the spot intensities and locations, the properties of the fluorescent targets can be determined. Commonly this is done by reducing noise with a low-pass filter and separating the spots by fitting a Gaussian mixture model with a local optimization algorithm. However, filtering smears the overlapping spots together and lowers quantification accuracy, and the local optimization algorithms are uncapable to find the model parameters reliably. In this sudy we developed a method to quantify the overlapping spots accurately directly from the raw images with a stochastic global optimization algorithm. To evaluate the method, we created simulated noisy images with overlapping spots. The simulation results showed the developed method produced more accurate spot intensity and location estimates than the compared methods. Microscopy data of cell membrane with caveolae spots was also succesfully quantified with the developed method.


Mixture Model Gaussian Mixture Model Point Spread Function Spot Intensity Population Member 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. [1]
    Schmidt, T., Schütz, G.J., Baumgartner, W., Gruber, H.J., Schindler, H.: Imaging of single molecule diffusion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 93(7), 2926–2929 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Schutz, G.J., Schindler, H., Schmidt, T.: Single-molecule microscopy on model membranes reveals anomalous diffusion. Biophys. J. 73(2), 1073–1080 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Pelkmans, L., Zerial, M.: Kinase-regulated quantal assemblies and kiss-and-run recycling of caveolae. Nature 436(7047), 128–133 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Anderson, C., Georgiou, G., Morrison, I., Stevenson, G., Cherry, R.: Tracking of cell surface receptors by fluorescence digital imaging microscopy using a charge-coupled device camera. Low-density lipoprotein and influenza virus receptor mobility at 4 degrees c. J. Cell Sci. 101(2), 415–425 (1992)Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Thomann, D., Rines, D.R., Sorger, P.K., Danuser, G.: Automatic fluorescent tag detection in 3D with super-resolution: application to the analysis of chromosome movement. J. Microsc. 208(Pt 1), 49–64 (2002)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Mashanov, G.I.I., Molloy, J.E.E.: Automatic detection of single fluorophores in live cells. Biophys. J. 92, 2199–2211 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Price, K.V., Storn, R.M., Lampinen, J.A.: Differential evolution - A practical approach to global optimization. Natural computing series. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Lampinen, J., Zelinka, I.: On stagnation of the differential evolution algorithm. In: 6th international Mendel Conference on Soft Computing, pp. 76–83 (2000)Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Inoue, S.: Handbook of optics. McGraw-Hill Inc., New York (1995)Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Jansen, M., Pietiäinen, V.M., Pölönen, H., Rasilainen, L., Koivusalo, M., Ruotsalainen, U., Jokitalo, E., Ikonen, E.: Cholesterol Substitution Increases the Structural Heterogeneity of Caveolae. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 14610–14618 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harri Pölönen
    • 1
  • Jussi Tohka
    • 1
  • Ulla Ruotsalainen
    • 1
  1. 1.Tampere University of TechnologyTampereFinland

Personalised recommendations