Advertisement

An Ontology of Resources: Solving the Identity Crisis

  • Harry Halpin
  • Valentina Presutti
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5554)

Abstract

The primary goal of the Semantic Web is to use URIs as a universal space to name anything, expanding from using URIs for webpages to URIs for “real objects and imaginary concepts,” as phrased by Berners-Lee. This distinction has often been tied to the distinction between information resources, like webpages and multimedia files, and non-information resources, which are everything from real people to abstract concepts like ‘the integers.’ Furthermore, the W3C has recommended not to use the same URI for information resources and non-information resources, and several communities like the Linked Data initiative are deploying this principle. The definition put forward by the W3C, that non-information resources are things whose “essential nature is information” is a difficult distinction at best. For example, would the text of Moby Dick be an information resource? While this problem could safely be ignored up until recently, with the rise of Linked Data and projects like OKKAM, it appears that this problem should be modelled formally. An ontology called IRW (Identity and Reference on the Web) of various types of resources and their relationships, both for the hypertext Web and the Semantic Web, is presented. It builds upon Information Object Lite (an extension of DOLCE Ultra Lite for describing information objects) and IRE (an earlier ontology of and aligns with other work in this area. This ontology can be used as a tool to make the Semantic Web more self-describing and to allow inference to be used to test for membership in various classes of resources.

Keywords

Web architecture resource ontology linked data 

References

  1. 1.
    Abou-Zahra, S.: Evaluation and Report Language (EARL) 1.0 Schema. W3C Working Draft, W3C (2007), http://www.w3.org/TR/EARL10-Schema/
  2. 2.
    Adida, B., Birbeck, M., McCarron, S., Pemberton, S.: RDFa in XHTML: Syntax and Processing. W3C Recommendation, W3C (2008), http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/
  3. 3.
    Auer, S., Bizer, C., Lehmann, J., Kobilarov, G., Cyganiak, R., Ives, Z.: DBpedia: A nucleus for a web of open data. In: Aberer, K., Choi, K.-S., Noy, N., Allemang, D., Lee, K.-I., Nixon, L., Golbeck, J., Mika, P., Maynard, D., Mizoguchi, R., Schreiber, G., Cudré-Mauroux, P. (eds.) ASWC 2007 and ISWC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4825, pp. 722–735. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., Masinter, L.: IETF RFC 2396 Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax (1998), http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt (last accessed on September 15, 2008)
  5. 5.
    Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., Masinter, L.: IETF RFC 3986 Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax (January 2005), http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3986.txt (last accessed on April 2, 2008)
  6. 6.
    Berners-Lee, T., Hollenbach, J., Lu, K., Presbrey, J., Prud’hommeaux, E., Schraefel, M.: Tabulator Redux: Browsing and Writing Linked Data. In: Proceedings of the WWW 2007 Workshop on Linked Data on the Web (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bizer, C., Cygniak, R., Heath, T.: How to publish Linked Data on the Web (2007), http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/bizer/pub/LinkedDataTutorial/ (last accessed on May 28, 2008)
  8. 8.
    Booth, D.: URIs and the myth of resource identity. In: Proceedings of Identity, Reference, and the Web Workshop at the WWW Conference (2006), http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin/irw2006/dbooth.pdf
  9. 9.
    Booth, D.: URIs declaration versus use. In: Proceedings of Identity, Reference, and the Semantic Web Workshop at the European Semantic Web Conference (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bouquet, P., Stoermer, H., Giacomuzzi, D.: OKKAM: Enabling a Web of Entities. In: i3: Identity, Identifiers, Identification. Proceedings of the WWW 2007 Workshop on Entity-Centric Approaches to Information and Knowledge Management on the Web, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Banff, Canada, May 8 (2007), ISSN 1613-0073, http://CEUR-WS.org/Vol-249/submission_150.pdf
  11. 11.
    Bouquet, P., Stoermer, H., Tummarello, G., Halpin, H. (eds.): Proceedings of the WWW 2007 Workshop I\(^{\mbox{3}}\): Identity, Identifiers, Identification, Entity-Centric Approaches to Information and Knowledge Management on the Web, Banff, Canada, May 8, 2007. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, CEUR-WS.org (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bouquet, P., Stoermer, H., Tummarello, G., Halpin, H. (eds.): Proceedings of the ESWC 2008 Workshop on Identity, Reference, and the Web, Tenerife, Spain, June 1, 2008. CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Connolly, D.: A pragmatic theory of reference for the web. In: Proceedings of Identity, Reference, and the Web Workshop at the WWW Conference (2006), http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin/irw2006/dconnolly2006.pdf (last accessed November 22, 2008)
  14. 14.
    Gangemi, A.: Norms and plans as unification criteria for social collectives. Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 16(3) (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Masolo, C., Oltramari, R., Schneider, L.: Sweetening ontologies with DOLCE. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Benjamins, V.R. (eds.) EKAW 2002. LNCS, vol. 2473, pp. 166–181. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hayes, P.: Message to www-rdf-comments@w3.org (2003), http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jul/0198.html
  17. 17.
    Hayes, P., Halpin, H.: In defense of ambiguity. International Journal of Semantic Web and Information Systems 4(2), 1–18 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hendler, J.: The Dark Side of the Semantic Web. IEEE Intelligent Systems 22(1), 2–4 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jacobs, I., Walsh, N.: Architecture of the World Wide Web. Technical report, W3C (2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/ (last accessed October 12, 2008)
  20. 20.
    Koch, J., Velasco, C.A., Abou-Zahra, S.: HTTP Vocabulary in RDF. W3C Working Draft, W3C (2008), http://www.w3.org/TR/EARL10-Schema/
  21. 21.
    Kripke, S.: Naming and Necessity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mogul, J.: Clarifying the fundamentals of HTTP. In: Proceedings of the 11th International World Wide Web Conference, pp. 444–457 (2002)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Parsia, B., Patel-Schneider, P.F.: Meaning and the Semantic Web. In: Proceedings of Identity, Reference, and the Web Workshop at the WWW Conference (2006), http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin/irw2006/bparsia2006.pdf
  24. 24.
    Pepper, S.: The case for published subjects. In: Proceedigs Identity, Reference, and the Web Workshop at the WWW Conference (2006), http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin/irw2006/spepper2.pdf
  25. 25.
    Presutti, V., Gangemi, A.: Identity of resources and entities on the web. International Journal of Semantic Web and Information Systems 4(2), 49–72 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sauerman, L., Cygniak, R.: Cool URIs for the Semantic Web. W3C Note, W3C (2008), http://www.w3.org/TR/cooluris/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harry Halpin
    • 1
  • Valentina Presutti
    • 2
  1. 1.School of InformaticsUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghScotland, UK
  2. 2.Semantic Technology LaboratoryISTC-CNRRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations