Advertisement

Towards Linguistically Grounded Ontologies

  • Paul Buitelaar
  • Philipp Cimiano
  • Peter Haase
  • Michael Sintek
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5554)

Abstract

In this paper we argue why it is necessary to associate linguistic information with ontologies and why more expressive models, beyond RDFS, OWL and SKOS, are needed to capture the relation between natural language constructs on the one hand and ontological entities on the other. We argue that in the light of tasks such as ontology-based information extraction, ontology learning and population from text and natural language generation from ontologies, currently available datamodels are not sufficient as they only allow to associate atomic terms without linguistic grounding or structure to ontology elements. Towards realizing a more expressive model for associating linguistic information to ontology elements, we base our work presented here on previously developed models (LingInfo, LexOnto, LMF) and present a new joint model for linguistic grounding of ontologies called LexInfo. LexInfo combines essential design aspects of LingInfo and LexOnto and builds on a sound model for representing computational lexica called LMF which has been recently approved as a standard under ISO.

Keywords

Domain Ontology Linguistic Information Lexical Resource Natural Language Generation Ontology Learning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Bechhofer, S., van Harmelen, F., Hendler, J., Horrocks, I., McGuinees, D.L., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Stein, L.A.: OWL Web Ontology Language Reference (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brickley, D., Guha, R.V.: RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0: RDF Schema. Technical report, W3C (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buitelaar, P., Cimiano, P., Haase, P., Sintek, M.: Towards linguistically grounded ontologies. Technical report, Institute AIFB, Universität Karlsruhe, TH (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Buitelaar, P., Declerck, T., Frank, A., Racioppa, S., Kiesel, M., Sintek, M., Engel, R., Romanelli, M., Sonntag, D., Loos, B., Micelli, V., Porzel, R., Cimiano, P.: Linginfo: Design and applications of a model for the integration of linguistic information in ontologies. In: Proceedings of the LREC OntoLex 2006 Workshop (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buitelaar, P., Sintek, M., Kiesel, M.: A lexicon model for multilingual/multimedia ontologies. In: Sure, Y., Domingue, J. (eds.) ESWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4011, pp. 502–513. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cimiano, P., Haase, P., Herold, M., Mantel, M., Buitelaar, P.: LexOnto: A model for ontology lexicons for ontology-based NLP. In: Proceedings of the ISWC 2007 OntoLex Workshop (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Francopoulo, G., Bel, N., Georg, M., Calzolari, N., Monachini, M., Pet, M., Soria, C.: Lexical markup framework: ISO standard for semantic information in NLP lexicons. In: Proceedings of the Workshop of the GLDV Working Group on Lexicography at the Biennial Spring Conference of the GLDV (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    The LMF Working Group. Language resource management – lexical markup framework (LMF). Technical Report ISO/TC 37/SC 4 N453 (N330 Rev.16), ISO (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hirst, G.: Ontology and the lexicon. In: Staab, S., Studer, R. (eds.) Handbook on Ontologies. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    McGuiness, D.L., van Harmelen, F.: OWL Web Ontology Language Overview. W3C Recommendation (February 2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Miles, A., Matthews, B., Beckett, D., Brickley, D., Wilson, M., Rogers, N.: Skos: A language to describe simple knowledge structures for the web. In: Proceedings of the XTech Conference (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nirenburg, S., Raskin, V.: Ontological Semantics. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Oltramari, A., Stellato, A.: Enriching ontologies with linguistic content: An evaluation framework. In: Proceedings of the LREC OntoLex 2008 Workshop (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Peters, W., Montiel-Ponsoda, E., Aguado de Cea, G., Gómez-Pérez, A.: Localizing ontologies in OWL. In: Proceedings of the ISWC OntoLex 2007 Workshop (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reiter, N., Buitelaar, P.: Lexical enrichment of biomedical ontologies. In: Prince, V., Roche, M. (eds.) Information Retrieval in Biomedicine: Natural Language Processing for Knowledge Integration. IGI Global (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wilks, Y.: The Semantic Web: Apotheosis of annotation, but what are its semantics? IEEE Intelligent Systems 23(3), 41–49 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Buitelaar
    • 1
  • Philipp Cimiano
    • 2
  • Peter Haase
    • 3
  • Michael Sintek
    • 4
  1. 1.DERI, Unit for Natural Language ProcessingNational University of IrelandGalwayIreland
  2. 2.Web Information Systems GroupTU DelftThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Institute AIFBUniversität Karlsruhe (TH)Germany
  4. 4.Knowledge Management Dept. & Competence Center Semantic WebDFKI GmbHKaiserslauternGermany

Personalised recommendations