Skip to main content

Translation of Textual Specifications to Automata by Means of Discourse Context Modeling

  • Conference paper
Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (REFSQ 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 5512))

Abstract

[Context and motivation] Natural language is the main presentation means in industrial requirements documents. In such documents, system behavior is specified either in the form of scenarios or in the form of automata described in natural language. The behavior descriptions are often incomplete: For the authors of requirements documents some facts are so obvious that they forget to mention them; this surely causes problems for the requirements analyst.

[Question/problem] Formalization of textual behavior description can reveal deficiencies in requirements documents. Formalization can take two major forms: it can be based either on interaction sequences or on automata, cf. survey [1]. Translation of textual scenarios to interaction sequences (Message Sequence Charts, or MSCs) was presented in our previous work [2,3,4]. To close the gap and to provide translation techniques for both formalism types, an algorithm translating textual descriptions of automata to automata themselves is necessary.

[Principal ideas/results] It was shown in our previous work that discourse context modeling allows to complete information missing from scenarios written in natural language and to translate scenarios to MSCs. The goal of the approach presented in this paper is to translate textual descriptions of automata to automata themselves, by adapting discourse context modeling to texts describing automata.

[Contribution] The presented paper shows how the previously developed context modeling approach can be adapted in order to become applicable to texts describing automata. The proposed approach to translation of text to automata was evaluated on a case study, which proved applicability of the approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kof, L., Schätz, B.: Combining aspects of reactive systems. In: Broy, M., Zamulin, A.V. (eds.) PSI 2003. LNCS, vol. 2890, pp. 344–349. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Kof, L.: Scenarios: Identifying missing objects and actions by means of computational linguistics. In: 15th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, New Delhi, India, pp. 121–130. IEEE Computer Society Conference Publishing Services, Los Alamitos (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Kof, L.: Treatment of Passive Voice and Conjunctions in Use Case Documents. In: Kedad, Z., Lammari, N., Métais, E., Meziane, F., Rezgui, Y. (eds.) NLDB 2007. LNCS, vol. 4592, pp. 181–192. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kof, L.: From Textual Scenarios to Message Sequence Charts: Inclusion of Condition Generation and Actor Extraction. In: 16th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 331–332. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mich, L., Franch, M., Novi Inverardi, P.: Market research on requirements analysis using linguistic tools. Requirements Engineering 9, 40–56 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rupp, C.: Requirements-Engineering und -Management. In: Professionelle, iterative Anforderungsanalyse für die Praxis, 2nd edn., Hanser–Verlag (2002) ISBN 3-446-21960-9

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boehm, B.W.: Software Engineering Economics. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1981)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Abrial, J.R., Börger, E., Langmaack, H.: The steam boiler case study: Competition of formal program specification and development methods. In: Abrial, J.R., Borger, E., Langmaack, H. (eds.) Dagstuhl Seminar 1995. LNCS, vol. 1165. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Abrial, J.-R., Börger, E., Langmaack, H. (eds.): Dagstuhl Seminar 1995. LNCS, vol. 1165. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Curran, J.R., Clark, S., Vadas, D.: Multi-tagging for lexicalized-grammar parsing. In: 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Sydney, Australia, July 17-21 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Blackburn, P., Bos, J., Kohlhase, M., de Nivelle, H.: Inference and computational semantics. CLAUS-Report 106, Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gervasi, V., Zowghi, D.: Reasoning about inconsistencies in natural language requirements. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 14, 277–330 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ryan, K.: The role of natural language in requirements engineering. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, pp. 240–242. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1992)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Fabbrini, F., Fusani, M., Gnesi, S., Lami, G.: The linguistic approach to the natural language requirements quality: benefit of the use of an automatic tool. In: 26th Annual NASA Goddard Software Engineering Workshop, Greenbelt, Maryland, pp. 97–105. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kamsties, E., Berry, D.M., Paech, B.: Detecting ambiguities in requirements documents using inspections. In: Workshop on Inspections in Software Engineering, Paris, France, pp. 68–80 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chantree, F., Nuseibeh, B., de Roeck, A., Willis, A.: Identifying nocuous ambiguities in natural language requirements. In: RE 2006: Proceedings of the 14th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE 2006), Washington, DC, USA, pp. 56–65. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Goldin, L., Berry, D.M.: AbstFinder, a prototype natural language text abstraction finder for use in requirements elicitation. Automated Software Eng. 4, 375–412 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Abbott, R.J.: Program design by informal English descriptions. Communications of the ACM 26, 882–894 (1983)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Sawyer, P., Rayson, P., Cosh, K.: Shallow knowledge as an aid to deep understanding in early phase requirements engineering. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 31, 969–981 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vadera, S., Meziane, F.: From English to formal specifications. The Computer Journal 37, 753–763 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Smith, R.L., Avrunin, G.S., Clarke, L.A., Osterweil, L.J.: Propel: an approach supporting property elucidation. In: ICSE 2002: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 11–21. ACM Press, New York (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Clark, S., Curran, J.R.: Wide-coverage efficient statistical parsing with ccg and log-linear models. Comput. Linguist. 33, 493–552 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Maiden, N.A.M.: CREWS-SAVRE: Scenarios for Acquiring and Validating Requirements. Automated Software Engineering 5, 419–446 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kof, L. (2009). Translation of Textual Specifications to Automata by Means of Discourse Context Modeling. In: Glinz, M., Heymans, P. (eds) Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality. REFSQ 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5512. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02050-6_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02050-6_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02049-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02050-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics