On the Cubicity of AT-Free Graphs and Circular-Arc Graphs

  • L. Sunil Chandran
  • Mathew C. Francis
  • Naveen Sivadasan
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5420)

Abstract

A unit cube in k dimensions (k-cube) is defined as the Cartesian product R1×R2× ⋯ ×Rk where Ri(for 1 ≤ i ≤ k) is a closed interval of the form [ai,ai + 1] on the real line. A graph G on n nodes is said to be representable as the intersection of k-cubes (cube representation in k dimensions) if each vertex of G can be mapped to a k-cube such that two vertices are adjacent in G if and only if their corresponding k-cubes have a non-empty intersection. The cubicity of G denoted as cub(G) is the minimum k for which G can be represented as the intersection of k-cubes.

An interesting aspect about cubicity is that many problems known to be NP-complete for general graphs have polynomial time deterministic algorithms or have good approximation ratios in graphs of low cubicity. In most of these algorithms, computing a low dimensional cube representation of the given graph is usually the first step.

We give an O(bw·n) algorithm to compute the cube representation of a general graph G in bw + 1 dimensions given a bandwidth ordering of the vertices of G, where bw is the bandwidth of G. As a consequence, we get O(Δ) upper bounds on the cubicity of many well-known graph classes such as AT-free graphs, circular-arc graphs and cocomparability graphs which have O(Δ) bandwidth. Thus we have:
  1. 1

    cub(G) ≤ 3Δ− 1, if G is an AT-free graph.

     
  2. 1

    cub(G) ≤ 2Δ + 1, if G is a circular-arc graph.

     
  3. 1

    cub(G) ≤ 2Δ, if G is a cocomparability graph.

     
Also for these graph classes, there are constant factor approximation algorithms for bandwidth computation that generate orderings of vertices with O(Δ) width. We can thus generate the cube representation of such graphs in O(Δ) dimensions in polynomial time.

Keywords

Cubicity bandwidth intersection graphs AT-free graphs circular-arc graphs cocomparability graphs 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Golumbic, M.C.: Algorithmic Graph Theory And Perfect Graphs. Academic Press, New York (1980)MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Roberts, F.S.: On the boxicity and cubicity of a graph. In: Recent Progresses in Combinatorics, pp. 301–310. Academic Press, New York (1969)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yannakakis, M.: The complexity of the partial order dimension problem. SIAM Journal on Algebraic Discrete Methods 3, 351–358 (1982)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Erlebach, T., Jansen, K., Seidel, E.: Polynomial-time approximation schemes for geometric intersection graphs. SIAM Journal on Computing 34(6), 1302–1323 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Afshani, P., Chan, T.: Approximation algorithms for maximum cliques in 3d unit-disk graphs. In: Proc. 17th Canadian Conference on Computational Geometry (CCCG), pp. 6–9 (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    van Leeuwen, E.J.: Approximation algorithms for unit disk graphs. In: Kratsch, D. (ed.) WG 2005. LNCS, vol. 3787, pp. 351–361. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Agarwal, P.K., van Kreveld, M., Suri, S.: Label placement by maximum independent set in rectangles. Comput. Geom. Theory Appl. 11, 209–218 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Berman, P., DasGupta, B., Muthukrishnan, S., Ramaswami, S.: Efficient approximation algorithms for tiling and packing problems with rectangles. J. Algorithms 41, 443–470 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Michael, T., Quint, T.: Sphere of influence graphs and the l  ∞ -metric. Discrete Applied Mathematics 127, 447–460 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fishburn, P.C.: On the sphericity and cubicity of graphs. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B 35(3), 309–318 (1983)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Maehara, H.: Sphericity exceeds cubicity for almost all complete bipartite graphs. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B 40(2), 231–235 (1986)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Michael, T., Quint, T.: Sphericity, cubicity, and edge clique covers of graphs. Discrete Applied Mathematics 154(8), 1309–1313 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chandran, L.S., Mannino, C., Orialo, G.: On the cubicity of certain graphs. Information Processing Letters 94, 113–118 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chandran, L.S., Francis, M.C., Sivadasan, N.: On the cubicity of interval graphs. Electronic Notes in Discrete Mathematics 29, 315–319 (2007)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Unger, W.: The complexity of the approximation of the bandwidth problem. In: Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 82–91 (November 1998)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Feige, U.: Approximating the bandwidth via volume respecting embeddings. In: Prceedings of the Thirtieth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 90–99. ACM Press, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Turner, J.: On the probable performance of heuristics for bandwidth minimization. SIAM journal on computing 15, 561–580 (1986)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kratsch, D., Stewart, L.: Approximating bandwidth by mixing layouts of interval graphs. SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics 15(4), 435–449 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kloks, T., Kratsch, D., Borgne, Y.L., Müller, H.: Bandwidth of split and circular permutation graphs. In: Brandes, U., Wagner, D. (eds.) WG 2000. LNCS, vol. 1928, pp. 243–254. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kloks, T., Kratsch, D., Müller, H.: Approximating the bandwidth of asteroidal triple-free graphs. Journal of algorithms 32(1), 41–57 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kratsch, D., Stewart, L.: Domination on cocomparability graphs. SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics 6(3), 400–417 (1993)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Sunil Chandran
    • 1
  • Mathew C. Francis
    • 1
  • Naveen Sivadasan
    • 2
  1. 1.Dept. of Computer Science and AutomationIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.Advanced Technology CentreTCSHyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations