How Many Bootstrap Replicates Are Necessary?
Phylogenetic Bootstrapping (BS) is a standard technique for inferring confidence values on phylogenetic trees that is based on reconstructing many trees from minor variations of the input data, trees called replicates. BS is used with all phylogenetic reconstruction approaches, but we focus here on the most popular, Maximum Likelihood (ML). Because ML inference is so computationally demanding, it has proved too expensive to date to assess the impact of the number of replicates used in BS on the quality of the support values. For the same reason, a rather small number (typically 100) of BS replicates are computed in real-world studies. Stamatakis et al. recently introduced a BS algorithm that is 1–2 orders of magnitude faster than previous techniques, while yielding qualitatively comparable support values, making an experimental study possible.
In this paper, we propose stopping criteria, that is, thresholds computed at runtime to determine when enough replicates have been generated, and report on the first large-scale experimental study to assess the effect of the number of replicates on the quality of support values, including the performance of our proposed criteria. We run our tests on 17 diverse real-world DNA, single-gene as well as multi-gene, datasets, that include between 125 and 2,554 sequences. We find that our stopping criteria typically stop computations after 100–500 replicates (although the most conservative criterion may continue for several thousand replicates) while producing support values that correlate at better than 99.5% with the reference values on the best ML trees. Significantly, we also find that the stopping criteria can recommend very different numbers of replicates for different datasets of comparable sizes.
Our results are thus two-fold: (i) they give the first experimental assessment of the effect of the number of BS replicates on the quality of support values returned through bootstrapping; and (ii) they validate our proposals for stopping criteria. Practitioners will no longer have to enter a guess nor worry about the quality of support values; moreover, with most counts of replicates in the 100–500 range, robust BS under ML inference becomes computationally practical for most datasets. The complete test suite is available at http://lcbb.epfl.ch/BS.tar.bz2 and BS with our stopping criteria is included in RAxML 7.1.0.
KeywordsPhylogenetic Inference Maximum Likelihood Bootstrap Support Value Stopping Criterion Bootstopping
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Andrews, D.W.K., Buchinsky, M.: On the Number of Bootstrap Repetitions for Bootstrap Standard Errors, Confidence Intervals, and Tests. Cowles Foundation Paper 1141R (1997)Google Scholar
- 5.Brooks, S.P., Gelman, A.: General Methods for Monitoring Convergence of Iterative Simulations. J. of Computational and Graphical Statistics 7(4), 434–455 (1998)Google Scholar
- 6.Davidson, A.C., Hinkley, D.V.: Bootstrap Methods and Their Application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)Google Scholar
- 11.Grimm, G.W., Renner, S.S., Stamatakis, A., Hemleben, V.: A Nuclear Ribosomal DNA Phylogeny of acer Inferred with Maximum Likelihood, Splits Graphs, and Motif Analyses of 606 Sequences. Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online 2, 279–294 (2006)Google Scholar
- 13.Guo, W., Peddada, S.: Adaptive Choice of the Number of Bootstrap Samples in Large Scale Multiple Testing. Stat. Appls. in Genetics and Mol. Biol. 7(1) (2008)Google Scholar
- 17.Holmes, S.: Bootstrapping Phylogenies Statistical Science, 18(2), 241–255Google Scholar
- 18.Manly, B.F.J., et al.: Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1997)Google Scholar
- 19.Moret, B.M.E.: Large-scale Phylogenetic Reconstruction. In: Brown, J.R. (ed.) Comparative Genomics: Basic and Applied Research, pp. 29–48. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis (2007)Google Scholar
- 21.Nylander, J.A.A., Wilgenbusch, J.C., Warren, D.L., Swofford, D.L.: AWTY (are we there yet?): A System for Graphical Exploration of MCMC Convergence in Bayesian Phylogenetics. Bioinformatics (2007) (advance access, published August 30)Google Scholar
- 23.Rambaut, A., Drummond, A.: Tracer MCMC Trace Analysis Tool version 1.3 (2004)Google Scholar
- 30.Stamatakis, A., Hoover, P., Rougemont, J.: A Rapid Bootstrap Algorithm for the RAxML Web Servers. Sys. Biol. (2008) (in press)Google Scholar
- 31.Stamatakis, A., Meier, H., Ludwig, T.: New Fast and Accurate Heuristics for Inference of Large Phylogenetic Trees. In: Proc. of IPDPS 2004, HICOMB Workshop, Proceedings on CD, Santa Fe, New Mexico (2004)Google Scholar
- 33.Zwickl, D.: Genetic Algorithm Approaches for the Phylogenetic Analysis of Large Biological Sequence Datasets under the Maximum Likelihood Criterion. PhD thesis, University of Texas at Austin (April 2006)Google Scholar