Spatial Interaction and Spatial Autocorrelation

  • Manfred M. Fischer
  • Martin Reismann
  • Thomas Scherngell
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)


The objective is to combine insights from two research traditions, spatial interaction modelling and spatial autocorrelation modelling, to deal with the issue of spatial autocorrelation in spatial interaction data analysis. First, the problem is addressed from an exploratory perspective for which a generalisation of the Getis–Ord G statistic is presented. This statistic may yield interesting insights into the processes that give rise to spatial association between residual flows. Second, the log-additive spatial interaction model is extended to spatial econometric origin-destination flow models consistent with an error structure that reflects origin, destination or origin-destination autoregressive spatial dependence. The models are formally equivalent to conventional spatial regression models. But they differ in terms of the data analysed and the way in which the spatial weights matrix is defined.


Spatial Autocorrelation Spatial Interaction Patent Citation Residual Flow Origin Region 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  2. Bolduc D, Laferriere R, Santarossa G (1992) Spatial autoregressive error components in travel flow models. Reg Sci Urban Econ 22:371–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brandsma AS, Kelletaper RH (1979) A biparametric approach to spatial autocorrelation. Environ Plan A 11:51–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cliff AD, Martin RL, Ord JK (1974) Evaluating the friction of distance parameter in gravity models. Reg Stud 8:281–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cox DR, Miller HD (1965) The theory of stochastic processes. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Cressie N (1993) Statistics for spatial data. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Durbin J (1960) Estimation of parameters in time-series regression models. J R Stat Soc B 22: 139–153Google Scholar
  8. Fischer MM (2002) Learning in neural spatial interaction models: a statistical perspective. J Geogr Syst 4:287–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fischer MM, Reismann M, Scherngell T (2006a) Spatial interaction and spatial autocorrelation. In: Paper presented at the International Workshop on Spatial Econometrics and Statistics. Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  10. Getis A (1991) Spatial interaction and spatial autocorrelation: a cross-product approach. Environ Plan A 23:1269–1277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Getis A (1995a) Spatial filtering in a regression framework: examples using data on urban crime, regional inequality, and government expenditures. In: Anselin L, Florax R (eds) New directions in spatial econometrics. Springer, Berlin, pp 172–188Google Scholar
  12. Griffith DA (1988a) Advanced spatial statistics: special topics in the exploration of quantitative spatial data series, vol 12. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  13. Hepple LW (1995) Bayesian techniques in spatial and network econometrics: 2 Computational methods and algorithms. Environ Plan A 27:615–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ord JK (1975) Estimation methods for models of spatial interaction. J Am Stat Assoc 70:120–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sen AK, Smith TE (1995) Gravity models of spatial interaction behavior. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  16. Smirnov O, Anselin L (2001) Fast maximum likelihood estimation of very large spatial autoregressive models: a characteristic polynomial approach. Comput Stat Data Anal 35:301–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wilson A (1967) A statistical theory of spatial interaction models. Transp Res 1:253–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manfred M. Fischer
    • 1
  • Martin Reismann
    • 1
  • Thomas Scherngell
    • 1
  1. 1.Vienna University of Economics and BusinessWienAustria

Personalised recommendations