Advertisement

Spatial Patterns of Fertility in Rural Egypt

  • John R. Weeks
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

The Getis*Ord G i statistic and the Getis spatial filtering method are shown in this paper to be very useful geospatial tools for uncovering the spatial patterns of human reproduction in a rural governorate in Egypt that had been assumed by many to be a spatially homogeneous area. We apply the G i * statistic to dasymetrically mapped data from the 1976, 1986 and 1996 censuses of Egypt to show that there were very distinct spatial patterns in fertility over time in this predominantly rural region of the Nile Delta. The spatial filtering technique allows us to conclude as well that the spatial component became more important over time as a predictor of fertility levels. Improvements in education represent a key feature of the changing rural social environment driving these spatial changes in fertility. There is evidence as well that increases in contraceptive utilization contributed to this change, but we are unable to evaluate its spatial component. Nonetheless, the research illustrates and illuminates the underlying conceptual framework that demographic behavior is a joint function of who people are and where they are.

Keywords

Spatial Autocorrelation Total Fertility Rate Spatial Component Fertility Decline Fertility Level 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anselin L, Rey SJ (1991) Properties of tests for spatial dependence in linear regression models. Geogr Anal 23:112–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arriaga EE (1994) Population analysis with microcomputers. Working paper, United States Bureau of the Census, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. El-Zanaty FH, Way AA (2001) Egypt demographic and health survey, 2000. Ministry of Health and Population, National Population Council (Egypt), Cairo, EgyptGoogle Scholar
  4. Entwisle B, Casterline JB, Sayed HAA (1989) Villages as contexts for contraceptive behavior in rural Egypt. Am Sociol Rev 54:1019–1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fargues P (1997) State policies and the birth rate in Egypt: from socialism to liberalism. Popul Dev Rev 23:115–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gadalla MS (1978) Is there hope? Fertility and family planning in a rural Egyptian community. Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NCGoogle Scholar
  7. Getis A (1995a) Spatial filtering in a regression framework: examples using data on urban crime, regional inequality, and government expenditures. In: Anselin L, Florax R (eds) New directions in spatial econometrics. Springer, Berlin, pp 172–188Google Scholar
  8. Getis A (1995b) Spatial filtering in a regression framework: examples using data on urban crime, regional inequality, and government expenditures. In: Anselin L, Florax RJGM (eds) New directions in spatial econometrics. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  9. Getis A, Griffith DA (2002) Comparative spatial filtering in regression analysis. Geogr Anal 34:130–140Google Scholar
  10. Griffith DA (2000) Eigenfunction properties and approximations of selected incidence matrices employed in spatial anlaysis. Linear Algebra Appl 321:95–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mennis J (2002) Using geographic information systems to create and analyze statistical surfaces of population and risk for environmental justice analysis. Soc Sci Q 83:281–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Openshaw S (1984) The modifiable area unit problem, CATMOG 38. Geoabstracts, NorwichGoogle Scholar
  13. Rashad H (2000) Demographic transition in Arab countries: a new perspective. J Popul Res 17: 83–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rashed T, Weeks JR, Gadalla MS, Hill AG (2001) Revealing the anatomy of cities through spectral mixture analysis of multispectral imagery: a case study of the greater Cairo region, Egypt. Geocarto Int 16:5–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Weeks JR (2004b) Using remote sensing and geographic information systems to identify the underlying properties of urban environments. In: Champion AG, Hugo G (eds) New forms of urbanization: beyond the urban–rural dichotomy. Ashgate, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Weeks JR, Gadalla MS, Rashed T, Stanforth J, Hill AG (2000) Spatial variability in fertility in Menoufia, Egypt, assessed through the application of remote-sensing and GIS technologies. Environ Plan A 32:695–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Weeks JR, Getis A, Hill AG, Gadalla MS, Rashed T (2004) The fertility transition in Egypt: intra-urban patterns in Cairo. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 94:74–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographySan Diego State UniversitySan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations