The Analysis of Spatial Association by Use of Distance Statistics

  • Arthur GetisEmail author
  • J. Keith Ord
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)


Introduced in this paper is a family of statistics, G, that can be used as a measure of spatial association in a number of circumstances. The basic statistic is derived, its properties are identified, and its advantages explained. Several of the G statistics make it possible to evaluate the spatial association of a variable within a specified distance of a single point. A comparison is made between a general G statistic and Moran’s I for similar hypothetical and empirical conditions. The empirical work includes studies of sudden infant death syndrome by county in North Carolina and dwelling unit prices in metropolitan San Diego by zip-code districts. Results indicate that G statistics should be used in conjunction with I in order to identify characteristics of patterns not revealed by the I statistic alone and, specifically, the G i and G i statistics enable us to detect local “pockets” of dependence that may not show up when using global statistics.


Spatial Autocorrelation Sudden Infant Death Syndrome Spatial Association Common Neighbor Standard Normal Variate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  2. Anselin L, Griffith DA (1988) Do spatial effects really matter in regression analysis? Pap Reg Sci 65:11–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arbia G (1989) Spatial data configuration in statistical analysis of regional economic and related problems. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  4. Cliff AD, Ord JK (1973) Spatial autocorrelation. Pion, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Cressie N, Chan N (1989) Spatial modeling of regional variables. J Am Stat Assoc 84:393—401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cressie N, Head THC (1989) Spatial data analysis of regional counts. Biom J 31:699–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis JC (1986) Statistics and data analysis in geology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Foster SA, Gorr WL (1986) An adaptive filter for estimating spatially-varying parameters: application to modeling police hours spent in response to calls for service. Manage Sci 32:878–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Getis A (1984) Interaction modeling using second-order analysis. Environ Plan A 16:173–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Getis A (1991) Spatial interaction and spatial autocorrelation: a cross-product approach. Environ Plan A 23:1269–1277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Getis A, Franklin J (1987) Second-order neighborhood analysis of mapped point patterns. Ecology 68:473–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hoeffding W (1951) A combinatorial central limit theorem. Ann Math Stat 22:558–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hubert L (1977) Generalized proximity function comparisons. Br J Math Stat Psychol 31:179–182Google Scholar
  14. Hubert L, Golledge RG, Costanzo C (1981) Generalized procedures for evaluating spatial autocorrelation. Geogr Anal 13:224–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mantel N (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27:209–220Google Scholar
  16. Pitman EJG (1937) The ‘closest’ estimates of statistical parameters. Biometrika 58:299–312Google Scholar
  17. Ripley BD (1977) Modelling spatial patterns (with discussion). J R Stat Soc B 39:172–212Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographySan Diego State UniversitySan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations