Skip to main content

Package-Based Description Logics

  • Chapter
Modular Ontologies

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 5445))

Summary

We present the syntax and semantics of a family of modular ontology languages, Package-based Description Logics (P-DL), to support context- specific reuse of knowledge from multiple ontology modules. In particular, we describe a P-DL \({\mathcal SHOIQP}\) that allows the importing of concept, role and nominal names between multiple ontology modules (each of which can be viewed as a \({\mathcal SHOIQ}\) ontology). \({\mathcal SHOIQP}\) supports contextualized interpretation, i.e., interpretation from the point of view of a specific package. We establish the necessary and sufficient conditions on domain relations (i.e., the relations between individuals in different local domains) that need to hold in order to preserve the unsatisfiability of concept formulae, monotonicity of inference, transitive reuse of knowledge across modules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bao, J., Caragea, D., Honavar, V.: A distributed tableau algorithm for package-based description logics. In: The 2nd International Workshop On Context Representation And Reasoning (CRR 2006), co-located with ECAI 2006 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bao, J., Caragea, D., Honavar, V.: Modular ontologies - a formal investigation of semantics and expressivity. In: Mizoguchi, R., Shi, Z.-Z., Giunchiglia, F. (eds.) ASWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4185, pp. 616–631. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Bao, J., Caragea, D., Honavar, V.: On the semantics of linking and importing in modular ontologies. In: Cruz, I., Decker, S., Allemang, D., Preist, C., Schwabe, D., Mika, P., Uschold, M., Aroyo, L.M. (eds.) ISWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4273, pp. 72–86. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Bao, J., Caragea, D., Honavar, V.: A tableau-based federated reasoning algorithm for modular ontologies. In: IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence, pp. 404–410. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bao, J., Slutzki, G., Honavar, V.: A semantic importing approach to knowledge reuse from multiple ontologies. In: AAAI, pp. 1304–1309 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bao, J., Voutsadakis, G., Slutzki, G., Honavar, V.: Package based description logics. Technical report, TR 567, Computer Science, Iowa State University (2008), http://archives.cs.iastate.edu/documents/disk0/00/00/05/67/index.html

  7. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The semantic web. Scientific American 284(5), 34–43 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Borgida, A., Serafini, L.: Distributed description logics: Assimilating information from peer sources. Journal of Data Semantics 1, 153–184 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Bouquet, P., Giunchiglia, F., van Harmelen, F., Serafini, L., Stuckenschmidt, H.: C-OWL: Contextualizing ontologies. In: Fensel, D., Sycara, K.P., Mylopoulos, J. (eds.) ISWC 2003. LNCS, vol. 2870, pp. 164–179. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Catarci, T., Lenzerini, M.: Representing and using interschema knowledge in cooperative information systems. In: CoopIS, pp. 55–62 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ghidini, C., Giunchiglia, F.: Local models semantics, or contextual reasoning=locality+compatibility. Artificial Intelligence 127(2), 221–259 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Ghilardi, S., Lutz, C., Wolter, F.: Did i damage my ontology? a case for conservative extensions in description logics. In: KR, pp. 187–197 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Grau, B.C., Horrocks, I., Kazakov, Y., Sattler, U.: A logical framework for modularity of ontologies. In: IJCAI, pp. 298–303 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Grau, B.C., Horrocks, I., Kutz, O., Sattler, U.: Will my ontologies fit together? In: Proc. of the 2006 Description Logic Workshop (DL 2006), vol. 189. CEUR (2006), http://ceur-ws.org/

  15. Grau, B.C., Kutz, O.: Modular ontology languages revisited. In: Workshop on Semantic Web for Collaborative Knowledge Acquisition (SWeCKa), co-located with IJCAI (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Grau, B.C., Parsia, B., Sirin, E.: Working with multiple ontologies on the semantic web. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 620–634. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Horrocks, I., Sattler, U.: A Tableaux Decision Procedure for \(\mathcal{SHOIQ}\). In: IJCAI, pp. 448–453 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Horrocks, I., Sattler, U., Tobies, S.: Practical reasoning for expressive description logics. In: Ganzinger, H., McAllester, D., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR 1999. LNCS, vol. 1705, pp. 161–180. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Lutz, C., Walther, D., Wolter, F.: Conservative extensions in expressive description logics. In: IJCAI, pp. 453–458 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pan, J., Serafini, L., Zhao, Y.: Semantic import: An approach for partial ontology reuse. In: 1st International Workshop on Modular Ontologies (WoMo 2006), co-located with ISWC (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Polleres, A.: Logic programs with contextually scoped negation. In: WLP, pp. 129–136 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Polleres, A., Feier, C., Harth, A.: Rules with contextually scoped negation. In: Sure, Y., Domingue, J. (eds.) ESWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4011, pp. 332–347. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Tobies, S.: The complexity of reasoning with cardinality restrictions and nominals in expressive description logics. J. Artif. Intell. Res. (JAIR) 12, 199–217 (2000)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Tobies, S.: Complexity results and practical algorithms for logics in Knowledge Representation. Phd thesis, LuFG Theoretical Computer Science, RWTH-Aachen, Germany (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zimmermann, A., Euzenat, J.: Three semantics for distributed systems and their relations with alignment composition. In: Cruz, I., Decker, S., Allemang, D., Preist, C., Schwabe, D., Mika, P., Uschold, M., Aroyo, L.M. (eds.) ISWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4273, pp. 16–29. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bao, J., Voutsadakis, G., Slutzki, G., Honavar, V. (2009). Package-Based Description Logics. In: Stuckenschmidt, H., Parent, C., Spaccapietra, S. (eds) Modular Ontologies. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5445. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01907-4_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01907-4_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-01906-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-01907-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics