Advertisement

Putting Agile Teamwork to the Test – An Preliminary Instrument for Empirically Assessing and Improving Agile Software Development

  • Nils Brede Moe
  • Torgeir Dingsøyr
  • Emil A. Røyrvik
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 31)

Abstract

Team organizing is a major way of assisting collaboration in knowledge intensive work such as software development, and is especially favored in agile approaches. Motivated by the challenge of transforming an organization from traditional command-and-control management to collaborative self-managed teams, we present an instrument that we argue addresses key concerns and characteristics of teamwork, and presents them along five dimensions that must be addressed when improving teamwork in agile software development. The dimensions are shared leadership, team orientation, redundancy, learning and autonomy. The instrument gives a radar plot of the status of the teamwork. We present empirical examples from using this instrument with three teams and briefly outline potential uses of the instrument.

Keywords

Agile software development scrum self-managed self-organized team radar team effectiveness empirical software engineering case study 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Dybå, T., Dingsøyr, T.: Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review. Information and Software Technology 50, 833–859 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nerur, S., Balijepally, V.: Theoretical reflections on agile development methodologies - The traditional goal of optimization and control is making way for learning and innovation. Communications of the ACM 50, 79–83 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boehm, B.W., Turner, R.: Balancing Agility and Discipline: A Guide for the Perplexed. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kraut, R.E., Streeter, L.A.: Coordination in software development. Communications of the ACM 38, 69–81 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hoegl, M., Gemuenden, H.G.: Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects: A Theoretical Concept and Empirical Evidence. Organization science 12, 435–449 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Greenwood, D.J., Levin, M.: Introduction to action research: social research for social change. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guzzo, R.A., Dickson, M.W.: Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology 47, 307–338 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cohen, S.G., Bailey, D.E.: What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management 23, 239–290 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sapsed, J., Bessant, J., Partington, D., Tranfield, D., Young, M.: Teamworking and knowledge management: a review of converging themes. International Journal of Management Reviews 4, 71–85 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Katzenbach, J.R., Smith, D.K.: The Discipline of Teams. Harvard Business Review 71, 111–120 (1993)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Langfred, C.W.: The paradox of self-management: Individual and group autonomy in work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior 21, 563–585 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Salas, E., Sims, D.E., Burke, C.S.: Is there a big five in teamwork? Small Group Research 36, 555–599 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tata, J., Prasad, S.: Team Self-management, Organizational Structure, and Judgments of Team Effectiveness. Journal of Managerial Issues 16, 248–265 (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Morgan, G.: Images of Organizations. SAGE publications, Thousand Oaks (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Young, S.M., Edwards, H.M., McDonald, S., Thompson, J.B.: Personality Characteristics in an XP Team: A Repertory Grid Study. In: Proceedings of Human and Social Factors of Software Engineering (HSSE), St. Louis, Missouri, USA, pp. 1–7 (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Whitworth, E., Biddle, R.: The Social Nature of Agile Teams, Agile, Washington, DC, pp. 26–36 (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Seger, T., Hazzan, O., Bar-Nahor, R.: Agile Orientation and Psychological Needs, Self-Efficacy, and Perceived Support: A Two Job-Level Comparison, Agile, Toronto, pp. 3–14 (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Beecham, S., Sharp, H., Baddoo, N., Hall, T., Robinson, H.: Does the XP environment meet the motivational needs of the software developer? An empirical study, Agile, Washington, DC, pp. 37–49 (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tessem, B., Maurer, F.: Job Satisfaction and Motivation in a Large Agile Team. In: Concas, G., Damiani, E., Scotto, M., Succi, G. (eds.) XP 2007. LNCS, vol. 4536, pp. 54–61. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Acuña, S.T., Gómez, M., Juristo, N.: Towards understanding the relationship between team climate and software quality—a quasi-experimental study. Empirical software engineering 13, 401–434 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Moe, N.B., Dingsoyr, T.: Scrum and team effectiveness: Theory and practice. In: 9th International Conference on Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Porgramming, Limerick, Ireland, pp. 11–20 (2008)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kirkman, B.L., Rosen, B.: Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal 42, 58–74 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pearce, C.L.: The future of leadership: Combining vertical and shared leadership to transform knowledge work. Academy of Management Executive 18, 47–57 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hewitt, B., Walz, D.: Using Shared Leadership to Foster Knowledge Sharing in Information Systems Development Projects. In: Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2005. HICSS 2005, p. 256a (2005)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hoegl, M., Parboteeah, K.P.: Autonomy and teamwork in innovative projects. Human Resource Management 45, 67–79 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Emery, F., Thorsrud, E.: Democracy at work: the report of the Norwegian industrial democracy program. Martinus Nijhoff Social Sciences Division, Leiden (1976)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Marks, M.A.: A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. The Academy of Management review 26, 356 (2001)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Takeuchi, H., Nonaka, I.: The New New Product Development Game. Harvard Business Review 64, 137–146 (1986)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Moe, N.B., Aurum, A.: Understanding Decision-Making in Agile Software Development: a Case-study. In: EuroMicro, Parma, Italy. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nils Brede Moe
    • 1
  • Torgeir Dingsøyr
    • 1
  • Emil A. Røyrvik
    • 2
  1. 1.SINTEF ICTNorway
  2. 2.SINTEF Technology and SocietyTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations