Advertisement

Sparse Representation for Video-Based Face Recognition

  • Imran Naseem
  • Roberto Togneri
  • Mohammed Bennamoun
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5558)

Abstract

In this paper we address for the first time, the problem of video-based face recognition in the context of sparse representation classification (SRC). The SRC classification using still face images, has recently emerged as a new paradigm in the research of view-based face recognition. In this research we extend the SRC algorithm for the problem of temporal face recognition. Extensive identification and verification experiments were conducted using the VidTIMIT database [1,2]. Comparative analysis with state-of-the-art Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) based recognition was also performed. The SRC algorithm achieved 94.45% recognition accuracy which was found comparable to 93.83% results for the SIFT based approach. Verification experiments yielded 1.30% Equal Error Rate (EER) for the SRC which outperformed the SIFT approach by a margin of 0.5%. Finally the two classifiers were fused using the weighted sum rule. The fusion results consistently outperformed the individual experts for identification, verification and rank-profile evaluation protocols.

Keywords

Face Recognition Video Sequence Sparse Representation Independent Component Analysis Scale Invariant Feature Transform 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Sanderson, C., Paliwal, K.K.: Identity verification using speech and face information. Digital Signal Processing 14(5), 449–480 (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sanderson, C.: Biometric person recognition: Face, speech and fusion. VDM-Verlag (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jolliffe, I.T.: Pricipal Component Analysis. Springer, New York (1986)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Turk, M., Pentland, A.: Eigenfaces for recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neurosicence 3(1), 71–86 (1991)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Belhumeur, V., Hespanha, J., Kriegman, D.: Eigenfaces vs Fisherfaces: Recognition using class specific linear projection. IEEE Tran. PAMI 17(7), 711–720 (1997)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Comon, P.: Independent Component Analysis - A New Concept? Signal Processing 36, 287–314 (1994)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bartlett, M., Lades, H., Sejnowski, T.: Independent component representations for face recognition. In: Proceedings of the SPIE: Conference on Human Vision and Electronic Imaging III, vol. 3299, pp. 528–539 (1998)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Duda, R.O., Hart, P.E., Stork, D.G.: Pattern Classification. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Chichester (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wright, J., Yang, A., Ganesh, A., Sastri, S.S., Ma, Y.: Robust face recognition via sparse representation. IEEE Trans. PAMI (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Donoho, D.: Compressed sensing. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 52(4), 1289–1306 (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Candès, E., Romberg, J., Tao, T.: Robust uncertainty principles: Exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 52(2), 489–509 (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Donoho, D.: For most large underdetermined systems of linear equations the minimal l1-norm solution is also the sparsest solution. Comm. on Pure and Applied Math. 59(6), 797–829 (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Candès, E., Romberg, J., Tao, T.: Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements. Comm. on Pure and Applied Math. 59(8), 1207–1223 (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Candès, E., Tao, T.: Near-optimal signal recovery from random projections: Universal encoding strategies? IEEE Tran. Infm. Theory 52(12), 5406–5425 (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lowe, D.: Object recognition from local scale-invariant features. In: Intl. Conf. on Computer Vision, pp. 1150–1157 (1999)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bicego, M., Lagorio, A., Grosso, E., Tistarelli, M.: On the use of SIFT features for face authentication. In: CVPRW (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lee, K., Ho, J., Yang, M., Kriegman, D.: Visual tracking and recognition using probabilistic appearance manifolds. CVIU 99(3), 303–331 (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Viola, P., Jones, M.: Robust real-time face detection. International Journal of Computer Vision 57(2), 137–154 (2004)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kittler, J., Hatef, M., Duin, R.P.W., Matas, J.: On combining classifiers. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 20(3), 226–238 (1998)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Liu, L., Wang, Y., Tan, T.: Online appearance model. In: CVPR, pp. 1–7 (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lee, K., Kriegman, D.: Online probabilistic appearance manifolds for video-based recognition and tracking. In: CVPR, vol. 1, pp. 852–859 (2005)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chan, A.B., Vasconcelos, N.: Modeling, clustering, and segmenting video with mixtures of dynamic textures. IEEE Trans. PAMI 30, 909–926 (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Imran Naseem
    • 1
  • Roberto Togneri
    • 1
  • Mohammed Bennamoun
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Electrical, Electronic and Computer EngineeringThe University of Western AustraliaAustralia
  2. 2.School of Computer Science and Software EngineeringThe University of WesternAustralia

Personalised recommendations