Enhancement and Registration Schemes for Matching Conjunctival Vasculature

  • Simona Crihalmeanu
  • Arun Ross
  • Reza Derakhshani
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5558)

Abstract

Ocular biometrics has made significant strides over the past decade primarily due to the rapid advances in iris recognition. Recent literature has investigated the possibility of using conjunctival vasculature as an added ocular biometric. These patterns, observed on the sclera of the human eye, are especially significant when the iris is off-angle with respect to the acquisition device resulting in the exposure of the scleral surface. In this work, we design enhancement and registration methods to process and match conjunctival vasculature obtained under non-ideal conditions. The goal is to determine if conjunctival vasculature is a viable biometric in an operational environment. Initial results are promising and suggest the need for designing advanced image processing and registration schemes for furthering the utility of this novel biometric. However, we postulate that in an operational environment, conjunctival vasculature has to be used with the iris in a bimodal configuration.

Keywords

Image Enhancement False Reject Rate Iris Recognition Registration Scheme Robotic Assist Laparoscopic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Brelstaff, G., Blake, A.: Detecting Specular Reflections Using Lambertian Constraints. In: Second International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 297–302 (1988)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Derakhshani, R., Ross, A., Crihalmeanu, S.: A New Biometric Modality Based On Conjunctival Vasculature. Artificial Neural Networks in Engineering, St. Louis, USA (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Daugman, J.: How Iris Recognition Works. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 14(1), 21–30 (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Klinker, G.J., Shafer, S.A., Kanade, T.: Using a Color Reflection Model to Separate Highlights from Object Color. In: First International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 145–150 (1987)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li, Q., Sone, S., Doi, K.: Selective enhancement filters for nodules, vessels, and airway walls in two-and three dimentional CT scans. Medical Physics 30(8) (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Park, J.B.: Detection of Specular Highlights in Color Images using a New Color Space Transformation. In: International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, pp. 737–741 (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Periaswamy, S., Farid, H.: Elastic Registration in the Presence of Intensity Variations. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 22(7), 865–874 (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shafer, S.A.: Using Color to Separate Reflection Components. Color Research and Application 10(4), 210–218 (1985)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stoyanov, D., Yang, G.Z.: Removing Specular Reflection Components for Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery. In: International Conference on Image PRocessing, vol. 3, pp. 632–635 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tan, R.T., Ikeuchi, K.: Separating Reflection Components of Textured Surfaces using a Single Image. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 27(2), 178–193 (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tan, R.T., Nishino, K., Ikeuchi, K.: Illumination Chromaticity Estimation using Inverse-Intensity Chromaticity Space. In: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, vol. 1, pp. 673–680 (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simona Crihalmeanu
    • 1
  • Arun Ross
    • 1
  • Reza Derakhshani
    • 2
  1. 1.West Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA
  2. 2.University of MissouriKansas CityUSA

Personalised recommendations