Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Chirurgische Techniken und interventionelle Techniken

  • Chapter
Operative und interventionelle Gefäßmedizin

  • 5865 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Das Ziel jeder Gefäßnaht besteht darin, durch eine exakte Adaptation der Gefäßränder eine vollständige Blutstillung zu erreichen. Gleichzeitig muss die Integrität der Gefäßwand so weit wie möglich wiederhergestellt werden (◘ Abb. 10.1). Dies wird durch eine leicht evertierende Nahttechnik erreicht, bei der die Intima der zu vereinigenden Gefäßabschnitte exakt aufeinander zu liegen kommen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

Zu Kap. 10.1

  1. Bakal CW, Sprayregen S, Scheinbaum K, Cyanamon J, Veith FJ (1990) Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the infrapopliteal arteries: results in 53 patients. AJR 154: 171–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bergamini TM, Towne JB, Bandyk DF, Seabrook GR, Rihardson JD (1993) Durability of the in situ bypass following modification of abnormal vein segment. J Surg Res 54: 196–201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brewster DC, Perler BA, Robinson JG, Darling RC (1982) Aortofemoral graft for multilevel occlusive disease. Predictors of success and need for distal bypass. Arch Surg 117: 1593–1600

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. CAPRIE steering committee (1996) A randomized, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischemic events (CAPRIE). Lancet 348: 1329–1339

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chang BB, Darling RC, Bock DE, Shah DM, Leather RP (1995) The use of spliced vein bypasses for infrainguinal arterial reconstruction. J Vasc Surg 21: 403–412

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Clagett GP, Valentine RJ, Hagino RT (1997) Autogenous aortoiliac/ femoral reconstruction from superficial femoral-popliteal veins: feasibility and durability. J Vasc Surg 25: 255–270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. De Roeck A, Hendriks JM, Delrue F et al. (2006) Long-term results of primary stenting for long and complex iliac artery occlusions. Acta Chir Belg 106: 187–192

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Debus ES, Larena A, Sailer MA, Moll R, Franke S (2002) Der dorsolaterale Fibularisbypass – Beschreibung des Zugangs-weges und erste klinische Erfahrungen. Gefäßchirurgie 7: 89–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Franzeck UK, Talke P, Bernstein EF, Golbranson FL, Fronek A (1982) Transcutaneous pO2 measurements in health and peripheral arterial disease. Surgery 91: 156–163

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gordon IL, Conroy RM, Arefi M, Tobis JM, Stemmer EA, Wilson SE (2001) Three-year outcome of endovascular treatment of superficial femoral artery occlusion. Arch Surg 136: 221–228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gross-Fengels W, Mückner K, Imig H, Schröder A, Wagenhofer KU, Siemens P (1998) Möglichkeiten und Risiken der ambulanten PTA bei Patienten mit peripherer arterieller Verschlusserkrankung. RöFo 168: 175–179

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Holzenbein TJ, Pomposelli FB, Miller A et al. (1996) Results of a policy with arm veins used as first alternative to an unavailable ipsilaterale greater saphenous vein for infrainguinal bypass. J Vasc Surg 23: 130–140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Karacagil S, Lofberg AM, Granbo A, Lorelius LE, Bergqvist D (1996) Value of duplex scanning in evaluation of crural and foot arteries in limbs with severe lower limb ischemia: a prospective comparison with angiography. Eur J VascE ndovascSur g 12: 300–303

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. KramHB, Gupta SK, Veith FJ, Wengerter KR, Panetta TF, Nwosis C (1991) Late results of twohundredseventeen femoropopliteal bypasses to isolated popliteal artery segments. J Vasc Surg 1991; 14: 386–390

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kudo T, Chandra FA, Ahn SS (2005) The effectiveness of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for the treatment of critical limb ischemia: a 10-year experience. J Vasc Surg 41: 423–435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ohta T (1995) Noninvasive technique using thallium-201 for predicting ischemic ulcer healing of the foot. Br J Surg 72: 892–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Reifsnyder T, Grossman JP, Leers SA (1997) Limb loss after lower extremity bypass. Am J Surg 174: 149–151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Scheffler A, Rieger H (1992) Spontaneous oscillations of laser Doppler skin blood flux in peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Int J Microcirc Clin Exp 11: 249–261

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schneider JR, Walsh DB, McDaniel MD, Zwolak RM, Besso SR, Cronenenwett JL (1993) Pedal bypass versus tibial bypass with autogenous vein: a comparison outcome and hemodynamic results. J VascvSurg 17:1029–1038

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Schröder A, Mückner K, Riepe G, Siemens P, Gross-Fengels W, Imig H (1998) Semiclosed iliac recanalisation by an inguinal approach-modified surgical interventional procedures. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1998; 16: 501–508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schürmann K, Mahnken A, Meyer J, Haage P, Chalabi K, Peters I, Günther RW, Vorwerk D (2002) Long-term results 10 years after iliacar terial stent placement. Radiology 224: 731–738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schweiger H, Klein P, Lang W (1993) Tibial bypass grafting for limb salvage with ringed polytetrafluorethylene prostheses: results of primary and secondary procedures. J Vasc Surg 18: 867–874

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shah DM, Leather RP, Darling RC, Chang BB, Paty PSK, Lloyd WB (1996) Long term results of using in situ saphenus vein bypass. Adv Surg 30: 123–140

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stonebridge PA, Prescott RJ, Ruckley CV (1997) Randomized trial comparing infrainguinal polytetrafluorethylene bypass grafting with and without vein interposition cuff at the distal anastomosis. J Vasc Surg 26: 543–550

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. SurowiecS M, Davies MG, Eberly SW et al. (2005) Percutaneous angioplasty and stenting of the superficial femoral artery. J Vasc Surg 41: 269–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Transatlantic inter-society consensus (TASC) (2000) Management of peripheral arterial disease. J VascSur g 31: 178–238

    Google Scholar 

  27. Upchurch GR, Dimick JB, Wainess RM et al. (2004) Diffusion of new technology in health care: the case of aorto-iliac occlusive disease. Surgery 136: 812–818

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Varty K, Nydahl S, Butterworth P, Errington M, Bolia A, Bell PR, London NJ (1996) Changes in the management of critical limb ischaemia. Br J Surg 83: 953–956

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Veith FJ, Gupta SK, Ascer E et al. (1986)Six-year prospective multicenter randomized comparison of autologous saphenous vein and expanded polytetrafluorethylene grafts in infrainguinal arterial reconstructions. J Vasc Surg 3: 104–114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Vorwerk D, Günther RW (2001) Percutaneous interventions for treatment of iliaca artery stenoses and occlusions. World J Surg 25: 319–326

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wagner HJ (2002) Current Status of endovascular therapy in the femoropopliteal segment in chronic peripheral arterial occlusive disease. VASA 31: 153–161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wolfe JH, Wyatt MG (1997) Critical and subcritical ischaemia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 13: 578–582

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zu Kap. 10.2

  1. Anscombe AR, Hira N, Hunt B (1970) The Use of a New Absorbable Material (PGS) in General Surgery. Brit J Surg 57: 917–920

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Blomstedt B, Jacobsson S-J (1970) Experiences with Polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) in General Surgery. Acta Chir Scand 143: 259–263

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carlson MA (2000) Neue Entwicklungen beim Bauchdeckenverschluss. Chirurg 71:743–753

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chu CC (1982) The Effect of pH on the in vitro degradation of polyglycolide lactide copolymer Absorbable sutures. J Biomed Mater Res 16(2): 117–124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chu CC, Moncrief G (1983) An in vitro evaluation of the stability of mechanical prooperties of surgical suture Materials in various pH conditions. Ann Surg 198(2): 223–228

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Craig P, Wililiams JA, Davis KW, Magoun AD, Levy AS et al. (1975) A biologic comparison of Polyglactin 910 and Polyglycolic Acid synthetic absorbable sutures. Surg Gynecol & Obstet 141: 1–10

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Debus ES, Geiger D, Sailer M, Ederer J, Thiede A (1997) Physical, biological and handling characteristics of surgical suture material: a comparison of four different multifilament absorbable sutures. Eur Surg Res 29: 52–61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Debus ES, Geiger D, Ziegler UE, Thiede A (1999) Nahtmaterialien: Eigenschaften und Wertigkeit der Parameter physikalische und biologische Eigenschaften, Handhabungseigenschaften, Gewebeverträglichkeit. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl: 439–442

    Google Scholar 

  9. Diener H (2001) Organspezifisches Resorptionsverhalten verschiedener moderner absorbierbarer Nahtmaterialien. Inauguraldissertation, Medizinische Fakultät der Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg

    Google Scholar 

  10. Echeverria EA, Jimenez J (1970) Evaluation of an absorbable synthetic suture material Surg Gynecol & Obstet 131: 1–14

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaeser A, Dum N (1993) Grundlagen der Fibrinklebung: Qualitätsanforderungen und Infektionssicherheit von Fibrinkleber. In Haverich A, Hutz Ch (Hrsg.) Fibrinklebung in der Herz-, Gefässund Thoraxchirurgie. Steinkopff, Darmstadt, pp 13–24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Knoop M, Lünstedt B, Thiede A (1987) Maxon und PDS – Bewertung physikalischer und biologischer Eigenschaften monofiler, absorbierbarer Nahtmaterialien. Langenbecks Arch Chir 371:13–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Linder J (1982) Morphologie und Biochemie der Wundheilung. Langenbecks Arch Chir 358:153–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Morgan MN (1969) New synthetic absorbable suture material. Brit Med J 2

    Google Scholar 

  15. Müller M, Allgöwer C (1981) Nahtmaterial und Nahttechnik. In: Allgöwer M, Harder F, Hollander LF, Peiper H-J (Hrsg.) Chirurgische Gastroenterologie. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Outlaw KK, Vela AR, O'Leary JP (1998) Breaking strength and diameter of absorbable sutures after in vivo exposure in the rat. Am Surg 64 (4): 348–354

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Postlethwait RW (1970) Polyglycolic acid surgical suture. Arch Surg 101: 489–494

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Postlethwait RW (1974) Further study of polyglycolic acid suture. Amer J Surg 127: 617–619

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rodeheaver GT, Thacker JG, Owen J, Strauss M, Masterson T, Edlich RF (1983) Knotting and handling characteristics of coated synthetic absorbable sutures. J Surg Res 35: 525–530

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Salthouse TN, Matlaga BF (1976) Polyglactin 910 suture absorption and the role of cellular enzymes. Surg Gynaecol & Obstet 142: 544–550

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Schardey HM, Joosten U, Finke U, Staubach KH, Schauer R, Heiss A, Kooistra A, Rau HG, Nibler R, Lüdeling S, Unertl K, Ruckdeschel G, Exner H, Schildberg FW (1997a) The prevention of anastomotic leakage after total gastrectomy with local decontamination. Ann Surg 225:172–180

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schumpelick V, Klinge U, Melty G, Klosterhalfen B (1999) Meshes in der Bauchwand. Chirurg 70:876–887

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Snyder CC (1976) On the history of suture. Plast Reconst Surg 58: 401–406

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stemberger A; Ascherl R, Scherer MA (1993) Klebstoffe in der Chirurgie – Versuch einer Bestandsaufnahme. In: Haverich A, Hutz Ch (Hrsg.) Fibrinklebung in der Herz-, Gefäss- und Thoraxchirurgie. Steinkopff, Darmstadt, pp 1–12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Thiede A, Lünstedt B (1979) In-vivo-Untersuchungen bei Nahtreaktionen an sterilen und infizierten absorbierbaren und nichtabsorbierbaren chirurgischen Nahtmaterialien. Zbl Chir 104: 568–581

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Thiede A, Jostarndt L, Lünstedt B, Sonntag HG (1980) Kontrollierte experimentelle histologische und mikrobiologische Untersuchungen zur Hemmwirkung von PGS-Fäden bei Infektionen. Chirurg 51: 35–38

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Thiede A, Hamelmann H (1982) Moderne Nahtmaterialien und Nahttechniken in der Chirurgie. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

Kap. 10.3

  1. Alexander JP (1994) Chemical lumbar sympathectomy in patients with severe limb ischaemia. Ulster Med J 63: 137–143

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cooper T (1966) Surgical sympathectomy and adrenergic function. Pharmacol Rev 18 (1): 611–8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Courtheoux P, Theron J, Evrard C, Maiza D, Oriot G (1982) Chemical lumbar sympathectomy: a new technic in therapeutic radiology. Ann Radiol Paris 25: 429–431

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Diez J (1924) Un nuevo método de simpatectomia periféirca para el tratamiento de las afecciones tróficas y gangrenosas de los miembros. Biol Soc Cir Buenos Aires 8:792

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gaza W von (1924) Über paravertebrale Neurektomie am Grenzstrang und paravertebrale Injektionstherapie. Klin Wschr 3: 525– 528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Haaga JR, Reich RE, HavrillaTR, Alfidi RJ (1977) Interventional CTscanning. Radiol Clin N Amer 15: 449–456

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hausstein UF (1996) Raynaud-Phänomen und Sklerodermie. Hautarzt 47: 336–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jaboulay M (1899) Le traiment de quelques troubles trophiques du pied et la chamb par la denudation de l'artere femorale et la distension des nerfs vasculaires. Lyon Med 91: 46–468

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lee BY, Da Silva MC, Aquino-Chu G et al. (1996) Surgery of the sympathetic nervous system. J Spinal Cord Med 19: 20–26

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Licht PB, Pilegaard H (2004) Severity of compensatory sweating after thoracoscopic sympathectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 78: 427–431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Loscertales J, Tristan AA, Loscertales C et al. (2004) Thoracoscopic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis: immediate results and postoperative quality of life. Arch Bronconeumol 40: 67–71

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mashiah A, Soroker D, Pasik S, Mashiah T (1995) Phenol lumbar sympathetic block in diabetic lower limb ischemia. J Cardiovasc Risk 2: 467–469

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rajesh YS, Pratap CP, Woodyer AB (2002) Thoracoscopic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis and Raynaud's phenomenon of the upper limb and excessive facial blushing: a five year experience. Postgrad Med J 78: 682–684

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ramos M, Almazan A, Lozano F, Gomez Alonso A (1983) Phenol lumbar sympathectomy in severe arterial disease of the lower limbs: a hemodynamic study. Int Surg 68: 127–130

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rieger H, Schoop W (1998) Klinische Angiologie. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Schild H, Grönninger J (1984) Transabdominelle CT-gesteuerte Sympathektomie. Fortschr Röntgenstr 141: 504–508

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schlaich MP, Sobotka PA, Krum H, Lambert E, Esler MD (2009) Renal sympathetic-nerve ablation for uncontrolled hypertension. N Engl J Med 361(9):932–4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Swetlow GI (1924) Alcoholic injections into nerve tissue for the relief of pain. Am J Med Sci 397–407

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ueyama T, Ueyama K, Ueyama K, Matsumoto Y (2004) Thoracoscopic Sympathetic Surgery for Hand Sweating. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 10: 4–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vollmar J (1996): Rekonstruktive Chirurgie der Arterien, 4. überarbeitete und erweiterte Aufl. Thieme, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  21. Walsh JA, Glynn CJ, Cousins M, Basedow RW (1985) Blood flow, sympathetic activity and pain relief following lumbar sympathetic blockade or surgical sympathectomy. Anaesth Intensive Care 13: 18–24

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Watarida S, Shiraishi S, Fujimura M et al. (2002) Laparoscopic lumbar sympathectomy for lower-limb disease. Surg Endoosc 16: 500–503

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Weyland A, Weyland W, Lamersdorf A et al. (1993) Neurolytische Blockaden des lumbalen Grenzstrangs in fortgeschrittenen Stadien der peripheren arteriellen Verschlußkrankheit. Aneasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 28: 420–425

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wilkinson HA (1984) Percutaneous radiofrequency upper thoracic sympathectomy: a new technique. Neurosurgery 15: 811– 814

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wolosker N, Kauffman P (2010) Thoracic Sympathectomy. In: Cronenwett JL, Johnston KW (eds) Rutherford's Vascular Surgery. Saunders Elsevier, New York, pp 1854–1864.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik und Poliklinik für Gefäßmedizin, Universitäres Herzzentrum GmbH, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg

    Univ.-Prof. Dr. med. E. Sebastian Debus

  2. GefäßCentrum Hamburg (GCH), ASKLEPIOS KLINIK Harburg, Hamburg

    Prof. Dr. med. Walter Gross-Fengels

Authors
  1. Univ.-Prof. Dr. med. E. Sebastian Debus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Prof. Dr. med. Walter Gross-Fengels
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik und Poliklinik für Gefäßmedizin, Universitäres Herzzentrum GmbH, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg

    E. Sebastian Debus

  2. GefäßCentrum Hamburg (GCH), ASKLEPIOS KLINIK Harburg, Hamburg

    Walter Gross-Fengels

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Debus, E., Gross-Fengels, W. (2012). Chirurgische Techniken und interventionelle Techniken. In: Debus, E., Gross-Fengels, W. (eds) Operative und interventionelle Gefäßmedizin. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01709-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01709-4_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-01708-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-01709-4

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation