A Driver Modeling Methodology Using Hypothetical Reasoning for Multiagent Traffic Simulation
- 572 Downloads
We propose how to acquire driver’s individual operation models using the three-dimensional driving simulator in order to implement distinct personalities on each agent. In this paper, operation models are defined as sets of prioritized operation rules, each of which consists of the world as observed by a driver and his/her next operation according to the observation. Each driver might have different set of rules and their priorities. We apply a method to acquire individual operation models using hypothetical reasoning. Because of the method, we are able to obtain operation models which can explain driver’s operation during driving simulation. We show some operation models acquired from aged/young human drivers, and then clarify the proposed method can catch each driver’s characteristics.
KeywordsMultiagent System Condition Part Aged Examinee Operation Model Operation Rule
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Paruchuri, P., Pullalarevu, A.R., Karlapalem, K.: Multi agent simulation of unorganized traffic. In: Proceedings of The First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2002), pp. 176–183 (2002)Google Scholar
- 2.Balmer, M., Cetin, N., Nagel, K., Raney, B.: Towards truly agent-based traffic and mobility simulations. In: The Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2004), pp. 60–67 (2004)Google Scholar
- 3.Espie, S.: Vehicle-driven simulator versus traffic-driven simulator: the inrets approach. In: Driving Simulation Conference (DSC 1999), pp. 367–376 (1999)Google Scholar
- 5.Fernlund, H., Gonzalez, A.J., Gerber, W.J., DeMara, R.F., Georgiopoulos, M.: Learning tactical human behavior through observation of human actor. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (2005)Google Scholar
- 6.Murakami, Y., Sugimoto, Y., Ishida, T.: Modeling human behavior for virtual training systems. In: The 20th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2005), pp. 127–132 (2005)Google Scholar