Automated Sealed-Bid Negotiation Model for Multi-issue Based on Fuzzy Method
This paper presents an automated sealed-bid design for multi-issue negotiation. In our negotiation model, both agents simultaneously submit their offers to the mediate agent. Each agent has a representation of its desired attributes for a trading commodity using fuzzy linguistic terms. This method is flexible for the agents to offer according to own demand, taking into account the interdependencies between the attributes. It is important to emphasize that proposed bargaining method is carried out under incomplete information, and agents’ information about own parameters are considered completely private. The design can discourage counter-speculation and effectively control fraud and misrepresentation in a certain extent. In addition, using the proposed method of calculating agreed-price, agents can be stimulated to reach an agreement as early as possible. Through a case study, the capabilities of the proposed method are illustrated.
KeywordsBargaining Multi-issue negotiation Sealed-bid Membership function
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 4.Fatima, S.S., Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R.: Optimal Negotiation of Multiple Issues in Incomplete Information Settings. In: Proc. of AAMAS 2004, pp. 1080–1087 (2004)Google Scholar
- 5.Lau, R.Y.K.: Towards Genetically Optimized Multi-agent Multi-issue Negotiations. In: Proc. of HICSS 2005 (2005)Google Scholar
- 6.Soh, L.K., Li, X.: Adaptive Confidence-based Multi-agent Negotiation Strategy. In: Proc. of AAMAS 2004, pp. 1048–1055 (2004)Google Scholar
- 7.Klein, M., Faratin, P., Sayama, H., Yam, Y.B.: Protocols for Negotiating Complex Contracts. IEEE Intelligent Systems (2003)Google Scholar
- 8.Klein, M.: Multi Issue Negotiation Protocol for Agents Exploring Nonlinear Utility Spaces. In: Proceedings of the Twentieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Hyderabad, India (2007)Google Scholar
- 9.Lin, R.J., Chou, S.T.: Bilateral Multi-issue Negotiations in a Dynamic Environment. In: Proc. of AMEC 2003 (2003)Google Scholar
- 13.Boley, H., Bhavsar, V.C., Hirtle, D., Singh, A., Sun, Z., Yang, L.: Agent Matcher Search in Weighted, Tree-structured Learning Object Metadata. In: Learning Objects Summit, pp. 29–30. Fredericton (2004)Google Scholar
- 14.Kebriaei, H., Majd, V.J.: A Simultaneous Multi-attribute Soft-bargaining Design for Bilateral Contracts. Expert Systems with Applications (2008), doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2008.05.003Google Scholar