A Basic Rhinoplasty Operation

Abstract

Why is rhinoplasty so difficult? The answer is the wide variation in the patient’s nasal anatomy and aesthetic desires. For the surgeon, the challenge is mastering the endless number of operative techniques available. Thus, the question becomes can one devise a basic rhinoplasty operation? A former resident who was 3 years into private practice made the following request: “Can you give me a basic rhinoplasty operation with which I can get good results and have few revisions?” My answer was quick and blunt — “It is impossible because both the anatomy and the requisite techniques are too varied.” Despite my negativity, the desire to develop a basic rhinoplasty operation has continued to intrigue me. Gradually, the fundamentals of a standard rhinoplasty operation began to crystallize. The following operation is intended for the average well-trained plastic surgeon. It can be expanded to fit a large range of nasal deformities. However, it requires that the surgeon accepts two principles. First, the surgeon must begin by doing only those cases which fit within their surgical comfort zone. Second, the surgeon must implement a progressive approach for learning rhinoplasty surgery. One begins with easier Level 1 cases and then advances to the more challenging Level 2 deformities before ultimately taking on the most difficult Level 3 problems. Distribution wise, perhaps 70% of the primary cases are Level 1, 25% are Level 2, and only 5% are Level 3. A fundamental operation will be presented in a step-by-step fashion in this chapter and its progressive adaptations for the three levels of deformities will be detailed in the rest of the text. It is important to select only those steps that are appropriate for a specific case.

Reading List

  1. Aiach O. Atlas of Rhinoplasty (2nd ed). St. Louis: Quality Medical Publishing, 1996Google Scholar
  2. Daniel RK. Rhinoplasty: Creating an aesthetic tip. Plast Reconstr Surg 80: 775, 1987CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Daniel RK. (ed) Aesthetic Plastic Surgery: Rhinoplasty. Boston: Little, Brown, 1993Google Scholar
  4. Daniel RK. Open tip suture techniques. Part I: Primary rhinoplasty. Part II: Secondary rhi-noplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 103: 1491, 1999 107: 1454, 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Daniel RK. Rhinoplasty: An Atlas of Surgical Techniques. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Daniel RK, Calvert JC. Diced cartilage in rhinoplasty surgery. PlastRreconstr Surg 113: 2156, 2004. Follow-up in: Daniel RK. Diced cartilage grafts in rhinoplasty surgery: Current techniques and applications. Plast Reconstr Surg 122: 1883, 2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Goodman WS. External approach to rhinoplasty. Can J Otolaryngol 2: 207 (Entire Issue devoted to Open Rhinoplasty) 1973PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Gorney M. Patient selection in rhinoplasty: Practical guidelines. In: Daniel RK (ed) Aesthetic Plastic Surgery: Rhinoplasty. Boston: Little, Brown, 1993Google Scholar
  9. Gruber RP, Nahai F, Bogdan MA, et al Changing the convexity and concavity of nasal cartilages and cartilage grafts with horizontal mattress sutures. Part I. Experimental results. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:589, 2005. Part II Clinical Results. Plast Reconstr Surg 115: 595, 2005CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gruber R, Chang TN, Kahn D, et al Broad nasal bone reduction: an algorithm for osteotomies. Plast Reconstr Surg 119:1044, 2007CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gubisch W. Twenty-fve years experience with extracorporeal septoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 22: 230, 2006 (Note: entire journal issue is devoted to septal surgery)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gunter J P. Secondary rhinoplasty: The open approach. In: Daniel RK (ed) Aesthetics Plastic Surgery: Rhinoplasty. Boston: Little, Brown, 1993Google Scholar
  13. Gunter JP, Rohrich RJ, and Friedman RM. Classifcation and correction of alar-columellar discrepancies in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 97: 643, 1996CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gunter JP, Rohrich RJ, and Adams WP. (eds) Dallas Rhinoplasty: Nasal Surgery by the Masters. QMP,757, 2007Google Scholar
  15. Guyuron B. Dynamic interplays during rhinoplasty. Clin Plast Surg 23: 223, 1996. (Entire Issue)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Guyuron B. Precision rhinoplasty. Part I: The role of life-size photographs and soft-tissue cephalometric analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 81: 489, 1988CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnson CM Jr. and Toriumi DM. Open Structure Rhinoplasty. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1990. Additional information in Johnson CM, Wyatt CT. A Case Approach to Open Structure Rhinoplasty. 2nd ed. New York: Elsevier, 2006Google Scholar
  18. Meyer R Secondary Rhinoplasty. Berlin: Springer, 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sheen JH. Rhinoplasty: Personal evolution and milestones. Plast Reconstr Surg 105: 1820, 2000CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Sheen JH, and Sheen AP. Aesthetic Rhinoplasty (2nd ed.) St. Louis: Mosby, 1987Google Scholar
  21. Tardy ME. Rhinoplasty: The Art and the Science. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1997Google Scholar
  22. Tebbetts JB. Rethinking the logic and techniques of primary tip rhinoplasty. Clin Plast Surg 23: 245, 1996. (Entire Issue)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Toriumi DM and Johnson CM. Open structure rhinoplasty: Featured technical points and long-term follow-up. Facial Plast Clin 1: 1, 1993. (Entire Issue)Google Scholar
  24. Toriumi, DM. New concepts in nasal tip contouring. Arch Facial Plast Surg 8: 156, 2006CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Thomas JR. The relationship of lateral osteotomies in rhinoplasty to the lacrimal drainage system. Otolaryngology 94: 362, 1986Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Newport BeachUSA
  2. 2.Department of Plastic SurgeryUniversity of California, IrvineIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations