Advertisement

Uroonkologie pp 283-313 | Cite as

Rehabilitation

  • O. Dombo
  • Mark Goepel
  • Guido Müller
  • Ullrich Otto
  • Herbert Rübben
  • Herbert Sperling

Zusammenfassung

Rehabilitation im Sinne einer »Wiederbefähigung« zur Teilnahme am gesellschaftlichen Leben nach Krankheit, Operation oder Trauma ist bereits in den medizinischen Schulen und in Tempeln des antiken Griechenlands belegt. Zur Anwendung kamen rehabilitationstypische Anwendungen wie Heilgymnastik, Massagen, Hydrotherapien und spirituelle Methoden.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

Literatur zu Kap. 18.1

  1. Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften AWMF (2003) Prinzipien onkologischer Rehabilitation — Interdisziplinäre Leitlinie der Deutschen Krebsgesellschaft. Federführung: Arbeitsgemeinschaft Rehabilitation, Nachsorge und Sozialmedizin (ARNS) — (Informationszentrum für Standards in der Onkologie — ISTO). AWMF-Leitlinien-Register: Nr. 032/005. Online publication unter: http://leitlinien.org. Erstellt Dezember 1997, überarbeitet Oktober 2003Google Scholar
  2. Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Krebsbekämfpung der Träger der gesetzlichen Kranken-und Rentenversicherung im Lande Nordrhein-Westfalen, Sitz Bochum (Hrsg) (1992) Kampf dem Krebs. Heft 26: Urologische Tumoren — Nachsorgeklinken. BochumGoogle Scholar
  3. Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Krebsbekämfpung der Träger der gesetzlichen Kranken-und Rentenversicherung im Lande Nordrhein-Westfalen, Sitz Bochum (Hrsg) (2002) Stationäre Rehabilitation bei Mamma-, Magen-und Prostatacarcinom. Multicenter-Studie zur Identifikation von Prädiktoren für die individuelle Rehabilitationsdauer und den langfristigen Rehabilitationserfolg. Roderer, RegensburgGoogle Scholar
  4. Balderson N, Towell T (2003) The prevalence and predictors of psychological distress in men with prostate cancer who are seeking support. Br J Health Psychol 8 (Pt 2): 125–134PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bates TS, Wright MP, Gillatt DA (1998) Prevalence and impact of incontinence and impotence following total prostatectomy assessed anonymously by the ICS-male questionnaire. Eur Urol 33: 165–169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft für Rehabilitation BAR (1994) Rehabilitation Behinderter: Schädigung — Diagnostik — Therapie — Nachsorge. Dtsch Ärzte-Verlag, KölnGoogle Scholar
  7. Bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft für Rehabilitation BAR (2002) Rahmenempfehlungen zur ambulanten onkologischen Rehabilitation. Schriftenreihe der BAR, Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
  8. Buse S, Reitz A, Haverkamp A, Hohenfellner M (2007) Konservative Therapie der männlichen Belastungsinkontinenz. Urologe 46: 240–243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davidson BJ, Alan I, So S (2007) Larry Goldenberg: Quality of life, sexual function and decisional reget at 1 year after surgical treatment for localized prostate cancer. BJU Intern 100: 780–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Delbrück H, Rübben H (Hrsg) (1993) Krebsnachsorge und Rehabilitation. Band 4: Prostatakarzinom. Zuckschwerdt, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  11. Delbrück H. (2003) Krebsnachbetreuung — Nachsorge, Rehabilitation und Palliation. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft DKG (1997) Qualitätssicherung in der Onkologie. Standards und Qualitätskriterien in der onkologischen Rehabilitation, Bd 7.1. Delbrück H (Hrsg) Krebsnachsorge und Rehabilitation. Zuckschwerdt, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  13. DIMDI Köln (2004) Internationale Klassifikation der Funktionsfähigkeit, Behinderung und Gesundheit. Vorläufige Endfassung (final draft) der deutschen Version der ICF der WHO von 2001, erarbeitet von einem internationalen deutschsprachigen Arbeitskreis, koordiniert von Schuntermann, MF: online publication unter: http://www.dimdi.de/static/de/classic/ICF/icf_dimdi_final draft_1.pdfGoogle Scholar
  14. Dombo O, Grosemans P, Hoffmann W, Otto U (1997) Rehabilitation der postoperativen Streßinkontinenz beim Mann nach radikaler Prostatovesikulektomie und Zystoprostatetkomie. Selbstverlag Klinik Quellental, Bad WildungenGoogle Scholar
  15. Dombo O, Otto U (2005) Lebensqualität nach radikalchirurgischen urologischen Eingriffen im Becken und die Bedeutung der Rehabilitation. Urologe A 44 (1): 11–28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gallistl H, Schlarp O, Hübner, WA (2006) Argus: Eine neuartige adjustierbare Schlinge in der Therapie der Postprostatektomieinkontinenz. Urologe 45: S43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gralla O, Buchser M, Haas F et al. (2008) »Fast-track« bei laparoskopisch radikaler Prostatektomie. Urologe 47: 712–717PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heinzer H, Heuer R, Nordenflycht O et al. (2005) Radikale retropubische »Fast-track-Prostatektomie“. Erste Erfahrungen mit einem interdisziplinären, multimodalen Behandlungskonzept zur Beschleunignung der postoperativen Rehabilitation. Urologe 44: 1287–1294PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Herkommer K, Fuchs TA, Hautmann RE, Volkmer BG (2005) Radikale Prostatektomie bei Männern unter 56 Jahren mit Prostatakarzinom. Eine Krankheitskostenanalyse. Urologe 44: 1183–1188.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Herkommer K, Niespodziany S, Zorn C et al. (2006) Versorgung der erektilen Dysfunktion nach radikaler Prostatektomie in Deutschland. Einschätzung durch den Urologen vs. Patientenbefragung. Urologe 45: 336–342PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hodzic J, Jedrusic P, Reckwitz T et al. (2008) Impact of preoperative antiandrogene medication and nerve-sparing surgery on the outcome of radical prostatectomy. Int Urol Nephrol 40: 965–970PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoffmann W, Liedke S, Otto U (1999) Prospektive Studie mit Medroxy-progesteronacetat. PCA-Journal 1/99Google Scholar
  23. Hoffmann W, Liedke S, Otto U (2001) Video-endoscopic biofeedback sphincter training for therapy of postoperative urinary incontinence after radical surgery. ICI Abstrakt-Band 2001, Paris, p 53Google Scholar
  24. Kälble T (2008) Behandlungsstrategien beim lokal fortgeschrittenen Prostatakarzinom. Urologe 47: 1403–1404PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Krauß O, Ernst J, Kauschke M et al. (2006) Patienten nach Prostatektomie. Psychische Begleiterkrankungen, Behandlungsbedarf und Lebensqualität. Urologe 45: 482–488PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kruck P (2003) (im Auftrag der Deutschen Krebsgesellschaft und mit Beratung durch die Arbeitsgemeinschaften der Deutschen Krebsgesellschaft) Prinzipien der onkologischen Rehabilitation. Interdisziplinäre Leitlinie der Deutschen Krebsgesellschaft. Federführung: Arbeitsgemeinschaft Rehabilitation, Nachsorge und Sozialmedizin (ARNS). Erstellt 1997, überarbeitet 2003, Überprüfung geplant: 2006 Online publication unter http://leitlinien.orgGoogle Scholar
  27. Kulaksizoglu H, Toktas G, Kulaksizoglu IB, Aglamis E, Unluer E (2002) When should quality of life be measured after radical cystectomy? Eur Urol 42 (4): 350–355PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Luboldt HJ, Otto T, Suhr J, Goebel PJ, Krege S, Rübben H (2002) Komplementärmedizin des Harnblasenkarzinoms. Ergebnisse der Studiengruppe des Westdeutschen Tumorzentrums. Urologe B 42, Heft 4: 293–296Google Scholar
  29. Mehnert A, Lehmann C, Koch U (2006) Prävalenz und Diagnostik psychischer Störungen in der Onkologie. Onkologe 12: 18–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Montorsi F, Brock G, Lee J et al. (2008) Effect of nightly versus on demand vardenafil on recovery of erectile function in men following bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatecctomy. Eur Urol 54: 924–931PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Montorsi F, Luigi G, Strambi L et al. (1997) Recovery of spontaneous erectile function after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy with and without intracavernous injections of alprostadil: results of a prospective, randomized trial. J Urol 158: 1408–1410PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Montorsi F, Salonia A, Barbieri L et al. (2002) The subsequent use of i.c. alprostadil and oral sildenafil is more efficacious than sildenafil alone in nerve sparing radical prostatectomy patients. J Urol 167 Suppl: 279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Müller G, Otto U (2008) Persistierende Postprostatektomieinkontinenz in der Rehabilitationsklinik. NRW-Urologenkongress Abstract V36Google Scholar
  34. Otto T, Eimer C, Gerullis H (2008) Repair of iatrogenic sphincter damage and urinary incontinence by autologous skeletal muscle derived cells (MDC). J Urol Suppl 179: 484 abstract 1414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Otto U (2005) Phonix aus der Asche. Einführung zum Thema Rehabilitation in der Urologie. Urologe A, 44: 1, S. 7–10Google Scholar
  36. Otto U, Dombo O (2002) Patienten mit Prostatacorcinom. In: Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Krebsbekämpfung (Hrsg) Stationäre Rehabilitation bei Mamma-, Magen-und Prostatacarcinom. Multicenter-Studie zur Identifikation von Prädiktoren für die individuelle Rehabilitationsdauer und den langfristigen Rehabilitationserfolg. Roderer-Verlag, Regensburg. S 85–138Google Scholar
  37. Otto U, Grosemans P, Hoffmann W, Dombo O (1998) Rehabilitation in der urologischen Onkologie. Urologe B Suppl 1: 35–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Otto U, Hoffmann W, Grosemans P, Liedke S (1999) Einfluss von Trospiumchlorid auf die Harninkontinenz nach radikaler Prostatektomie. Ergebnisse einer prospektiven, randomisierten Studie. Vorgetragen in Dresden 1999Google Scholar
  39. Raina R, Agarwal A, Zippe C (2002) Early use of vacuum constriction device following radical prostatectomy facilitates early sexual activity and potential return of erection. J Urol 167 Suppl: 279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rehder P, Gozzi C (2007) Transobturator sling suspension for male urinary incontinence including post-radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 52: 860–866PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Reiners S, Kirschner-Hermanns R, Jakse G (2008) Einfluss der Anschlussheilbehandlung auf die Harninkontinenz nach radikaler Prostatektomie. NRW-Urologenkongress Abstract V37Google Scholar
  42. Salonia A, Gallina A, Zanni G et al. (2008) How much are patients interested in erectile dysfunction treatment after radical prostatectomy? Eur Urol 53: 462–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schlenker B, Gratzke C, Reich O et al. (2006) Preliminary results on the off-label use of duloxetine for the treatment of stress incontinence after radical prostatectomy or cystectomy. Eur Urol 49: 1075–1078PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schmid L, Delbrück H, Bartsch HH, Kruck P (2000) Zur Strukturqualität in der onkologischen Rehabilitation. Rehabilitation 39: 350PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schmid L, Zellmann K, Liedl B, Clemm C, Weber B (2003) Rehabilitation. In: Lieds B (Hrsg) Manual des Tumorzentrums München der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität und der Technischen Universität: Empfehlungen zur Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge. Band »Urogenitale Tumoren«, 3. überarb. Aufl. Zuckschwerdt, München, S 159–166Google Scholar
  46. Scholz M, Strum S (1999) Letter to the editor. J Urol 161: 1914–1915PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schubert-Fritschle G, Weißbach L, Hölzel D (2005) Nachsorge oder keine Nachsorge — das ist hier die Frage! Urologe 44, Heft 9: 991–996PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schuntermann M (2003) Grundsatzpapier der Rentenversicherung zur Internationalen Klassifikation der Funktionsfähigkeit, Behinderung und Gesundheit (ICF) der Weltgesundheitsorganisation (WHO). Deutsche Rentenversicherung 1–2/2003, S 52–59Google Scholar
  49. Schuntermann MF (1996) Die internationale Klassifikation der Impairments, Disabilities und Handicaps ICIDH — Ergebnisse und Probleme. Rehabilitation 35: S. 6–13PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Seger W (2002) Sozlalmedizinische Betrachtungen. In: Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Krebsbekämpfung (Hrsg.): Stationäre Rehabilitation bei Mamma-, Magen-und Prostatacarcinom. Roderer Verlag, Regensburg, S. 145Google Scholar
  51. Sommer F, Peters C, Klotz T, Michna H, Schoenenberger A, Engelmann U (2002) Sport und Bewegung in der Pravention urologischer Erkrankungen. Teil I: Uroonkologie und erektile Dysfunktion. Urologe B 42, Heft 4: 297–305Google Scholar
  52. Sperling H, Noldus J (2003) Prostatakarzinom und erektile Dysfunktion. Welche Therapie wann? Urologe A 42:10: 1351–1356PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Steginga SK, Occhipinti S, Dunn J, Gardiner RA, Yaxley J, Heathcote P (2004) Prospective study of men’s psychological and decisionrelated adjustment after treatment for localized prostate cancer. Urology 63 (4): 751–756PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Teichmann JV (2002) Onkologische Rehabilitation: Evaluation der Effektivität stationärer onkologischer Rehabilitationsmassnahmen. Rehabilitation 41: S. 53–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vahlensieck W, Gäck M, Gleißner J, Liedke S, Otto U, Sauerwein D, Schindler E, Schultheis H, Sommer F, Templin R, Zellner M (2005) Struktur-und Prozessqualität der stationären urologischen Rehabilitation. Urologe A 44 (1): 51–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Verband Deutscher Rentenversicherungsträger VDR, Hrsg. (2000) Das Qualitätssicherungsprogramm der gesetzlichen Rentenversicherung in der medizinischen Rehabilitation. Instrumente und Verfahren. DRV-Schriften, Bd 18Google Scholar
  57. Weißbach L, Dieckmann KP (2005) Urologische Tumornachsorge — warum und wie? Urologe 44, Heft 9: 989–990PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. World Health Organization (1980) International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps (ICIDH), 1995 Dtsch Übersetzung von Matthesius R-G. Ullstein Mosby, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  59. World Health Organization (2001) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, Genf (CH)Google Scholar
  60. Zettl S, Menges-Beutel A, Otto U (2005) Die Bedeutung der Psychoonkologie in der Rehabilitation in der urologischen Onkologie. Urologe A 44 (1): 29–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Literatur zu Kap. 18.2

  1. Ahlberg J, Edland C, Wikkelso C, Rosengren L, Fall M (2002) Neurological signs are common in patients with urodynamically verified idiopathic bladder overactivity. Neurourol Urodyn 21: 65–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Betz D, Bartsch G, Bach P, Goepel M (2009) Results of Advance sling in men with post-prostatectomy incontinence. Eur Urol (in press)Google Scholar
  3. Bosch JL, Groen J (2000) Sacral nerve neuromodulationin the treament of patients with refractory motor urge incontinence: long-term results of a prospective longitudinal study. J Urol 163: 1219–1222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brito CG, Mulcahy JJ, Mitchell ME, Adams MC (1993) Use of a doublecuff AM 800 urinary sphincter for severe stress incontinence. J Urol 149: 283–285PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bugel H, Pfister C, Sibert L, Cappele O, Khalaf A, Grise P (1999) Intraurethral Macroplastique injections in the treatment of urinary incontinence after prostatic surgery. Prog Urol 9: 1068–1076PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chai TC, Gray ML, Steers WD (1998) The incidence of a positive ice water test in bladder outlet obstructed patients: evidence for bladder neural plasticity. J Urol 160: 34–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chapple CR, Haab F, Cervigni M, Dannecker C, Fianu-Jonasson A, Sultan AH (2005) An open, multicentre study of NASHA/Dx gel (Zuidex) for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 48: 488–494PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Clemens JQ, Schuster TG, Konnak JW, McGuire EJ, Faerber GJ (2001) Revision rate after artificial urinary sphincter implantation for incontinence after radical prostatectomy: actuarial analysis. J Urol 166: 1372–1375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crivellaro S, Singla A, Aggarwal N, Frea B, Kocjancic E (2008) Adjustable continence therapy (ProACT) and bone anchored male sling: Comparison of two new treatments of post prostatectomy incontinence. Int J Urol 10:910–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cruz F, Guimaraes M, Silva C, Rio ME, Coimbra A, Reis M (1997) Desensitization of bladder sensory fibers by intravesical capsaicin has long lasting clinical and urodynamic effects in patients with hyperactive or hypertensive bladder dysfunction. J Urol 157: 585–589PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davidson PJ, van den Ouden D, Schroeder FH (1996) Radical prostatectomy: prospective assessment of mortality and morbidity. Eur Urol 29: 168–173PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Di Marco DS, Elliot DS (2003) Tandem cuff artificial urinary sphincter as a salvage procedure following failed primary sphincter placement for the treatment of post-prostatectomy incontinence. J Urol 170: 1252–1254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dmochowski RR, Miklos JR, Norton PA, Zinner NR, Yalcin I, Bump RC (2003) Duloxetine vs. placebo for the treatment of North American Women with stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 170: 1259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elliot DS, Barrett DM (1998) Mayo-Clinic long-term analysis of the functional durability of ther AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter: a review of 323 cases. J Urol 159: 1206–1208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Filocamo MT, Li Marzi V, Del Popolo G, Cecconi F, Marzocco M, Tosto A, Nicita G (2005) Effectiveness of early pelvic floor rehabilitation treatment for post-prostatectomy incontinence. Eur Urol 48: 734–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Filocamo MT, Li Marzi V, Del Popolo G, Cecconi F, Villari D, Marzocco M, Nicita G (2007) Pharmacologic treatment in postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 51: 1559–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fowler FJ jr, Barry MJ, Lu-Yao G, Roman A, Wasson J, Wennberg JE (1993) Patient-reported complicationsand follow-up treatment after radical prostatectomy. The National Medicare Experience: 1988–1990. Urology 42: 622–629PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fulford SC, Sutton C, Bales G, Hickling M, Stephenson TP (1997) The fate of the modern artificial urinary sphincter with a follow-up of morethan 10 years. Br J Urol 79: 713–716PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gomha MA, Boone TB (2002) Artificial urinary sphincter for postprostatectomy incontinence in men who had prior radiotherapy: a risk and outcome analysis. J Urol 167: 591–596PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gousse AE, Madjar S, Lambert MM, Fishman IJ (2001) Artificial urinary sphincter for post-radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence: long-term subjective results. J Urol 166: 1755–1758PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gozzi C, Bauer RM, Becker AJ, Schorsch I, May F, Rehder P, Stief CG, Bastian PJ (2008) Functional retrourethral sling. A change of paradigm in the treatment of stress incontinence after radical prostatectomy. Urologe A 47: 1224–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gozzi C, Becker AJ, Bauer R, Bastian PJ (2008a) Early results of transobturator sling suspension for male urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 54: 960–1PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Herschorn S (2008) The artificial urinary sphincter is the treatment of choice for post-radical prostatectomy incontinence. Can Urol Assoc J 2: 536–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Huang G, Lepor H (2006) Factors predisposing to the development of anastomotic strictures in a single-surgeon series of radical retropubic prostatectomies. BJU Int 97: 255–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hubner WA, Schlarp O (2005) Treatment of incontinence after prostectomy using a new minimally invasive device: adjustable continence therapy. BJU Int 96: 587–594PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kaufmann JJ (1970) A new operation for male incontinence. Surg Gynecol Obstet 131: 295–299Google Scholar
  27. Kaufmann JJ (1972) Surgical treatment of post-prostatectomy incontinence: use of the penile crura to compress the bulbous uethra. J Urol 107: 293–297Google Scholar
  28. Kaufmann JJ (1973) Treatment of post-prostatecomy urinary incontinence using a silicone-gel prosthesis. Br J Urol 45: 646–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kuznetsov DD, Kim HL, Patel RV, Sterinberg GD, Bakes GT (2000) Comparison of artificial urinary sphincter and collagen for the treatment of postprostatectomy incontinence. Urology 56: 600–603PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Leach GE, Trockman B, Wong A, Hamilton J, Haab F, Zimmern PE (1996) Post-prostatectomy incontinence: urodynamic findings and treatment outcomes. J Urol 155: 1256–1259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Litwiller SE, Kim KB, Fone PD, White RW, Stone AR (1996) Post-prostatectomy incontinence and the artificial urinary sphincter: a longterm study of patient-stisfaction and criteria for success. J Urol 156: 1975–1980PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Madjar S, Jacoby K, Gilberti C (2001) Bone anchored sling for the treatment of post-prostatectomy incontinence. J Urol 165: 72–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Majoros A, Bach D, Keszthelyi A, Hamvas A, Romics I (2006) Urinary incontinence and voiding dysfunction after radical retropubic prostatectomy (prospective urodynamic study). Neurourol Urodyn 25: 2–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Manunta A, Guille F, Patard JJ, Lobel B (2000) Artificial sphincter insertion aftr radiotherapy: Is it worthwhile? BJU Int 85: 490–492PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Martinez-Salamanca JI, Allonga Almagro A (2007) Radical prostatectomy: open, Iaparoscopic and robotic. Actas Urol Esp 31: 316–27PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Perez LM, Webster GD (1992) Successful outcome of artificial urinary sphincters in men with post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence despite adverse implantation features. J Urol 148: 1166–1170PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Porena M, Mearini E, Mearini L, Vianello A, Giannantoni A (2007) Voiding dysfunction after radical retropubic prostatectomy: more than external urethral sphincter deficiency. Eur Urol 52: 38–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rogers E, Scardino PT (1995) A simple ileal substitue bladder after radical cystectomy: experience with a modification of the Studerpouch. J Urol 153: 1432–1438PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Romano S, Metrebian SE, Vaz F, Muller V, D’Ancona CA, Costa DE, Souza FA, Nakamura F (2006) An adjustable male sling for treating urinary incontinence after prostatectomy: a phase III multicentre trial. BJU Int 97:533–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schaeffer AJ, Clemens JQ, Ferrari M, Stamey TA (1998) The male bulbourethral sling-procedure for post-radical prostatectomy incontinence. J Urol 159: 150–1515Google Scholar
  41. Schmidt RA, Jonas U, Oleson KA (1999) Sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of refractory urinary urge incontinence. J Urol 162: 352–357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schreiter F (1985) Bulbar artificial sphincter. Eur Urol 11: 294–299PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Scott FB (1978) The artificial sphincter in the management of incontinence in the male. Urol Clin North Am 5: 375PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Shaker HS, Hassouna M (1998) Sacral nerve root neuromodulation: an effective treatment for refractory urge incontinence. J Urol 159: 1516–1519PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Siegel SW, Richardson DA, Miller KL (1997) Pelvic floor electrical stimulation for the treatment of of urge and mixed urinary incontinence in women. Urology 50: 934–940PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Siegel SW, Catanzaro F, Dijkema HE (2000) Long-term results of a multicenter study on sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of urinary urge incontinence, urgence-frequency, and retention. Urology 56: Suppl. 1, 87–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sousa-Escandón A, Rodríguez Gómez JI, Uribarri González C, Marqués-Queimadelos A (2004) Externally readjustable sling for treatment of male stress urinary incontinence: points of technique and preliminary results. J Endourol 18: 113–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sutherst J, Brown M, et al. (1981) Assessing the severity of urinary incontinence in women by weighing perineal pads. Lancet 1(8230): 1128–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Temml C, Haidinger G, Schmidbauer J et al. (2000) Urinary incontinence in both sexes: Prevalence rates and impact on quality of lifeand sexual life. Neurourol Urodyn 19: 259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ulrich NF, Comiter CV (2004) The male sling for stress urinary incontinence: urodynamic and subjective assessment. J Urol 172: 204–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Walsh PC (1987) Radical prostatectomy, preservation of sexual function, cncer control. The controversy. Urol Clin North Am 14: 663–673PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Walsh PC, Marschke P, Ricker D, Burnett AL (2000) Patient reported urinary continence nad sexual function after anatomic radical prostatectomy. Urology 55: 58–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Literatur zu Kap. 18.3

  1. Brock G, Taylor T, Seger M, Vardenafil Prospect Group Canada (2002) Efficacy and tolerability of vardenafil in men erectule dysfunction following radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol Suppl 1: 152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carson C, Lue T (2005) Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors for erectile dysfunction. BJU 96: 257–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carson C, Mulcahy J. Govier F (2000) AMS 700CX study group. Efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction outcomes of the ams 700cx inflatable penile prosthesis: results of a long-term multicenter study. J Vrol 164: 376–380Google Scholar
  4. Chartier-Kastler E, Amar E, Chevallier D, Montaigne O, Coulange C, Joubert JM, Giuliano F (2008) Does management of erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy meet patients’ expectations? Results of a national survey (REPAIR) by the French Urological Association. J Sex Med 693–704Google Scholar
  5. Chen J, Mabjeesh N, Greenstein A (2002) Sildenafil versus vacuum erection device: Patient preference. J Vrol 166: 1779–1781Google Scholar
  6. Cookson M, Nadig P (1993) Long-term results with vacuum constriction device. J Urol 149: 290–294PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Costabile R, Spevak M, Fishman I, Govier F, Hellstreom W, Shabsigh R, Nemo K, Rapport J, Tam P, Weldon K, Gesundheit N (1998) Efficacy and safety of transurethral alprostadil in patients with erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy. J Urol 160: 1325–1328PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Heaton J, Dean J, Sleep D (2002) Sequential administration enhances the effect of apomorphine in men with erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 14: 61–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Herkommer K, Niespodziany S, Zorn C, Gschwend J, Volkmer B (2005) Versorgung der erektilen Dysfunktion nach radikaler Prostatektomie in Deutschland Einschätzung durch den Urologen vs. Patientenbefragung. Urologe, online Publikation 12–27 (Dezember)Google Scholar
  10. Meulemann E, Mulders P (2003) Erectile function after radical prostatectomy: A Review. Eur Urol 43: 95–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. McCullough A (2002) Prevention and management of erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy. Urol Clin North Am 28: 613–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Meyer JP, Gillatt D, Lockyer R, MacDonagh R (2003) The effect of erectile dysfunction on the qaulity of life of men after radical prostatectomy. BJU 92: 929–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Montorsi F, Luigi G, Strambi L, Da Pozzo L, Nava L, Barbieri L, Rigatti P, Pizzini G, Miani A (1997) Recovery of spontaneous erectile function after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy with and without early intracavernous injections of alprostadil: results of a prospective, randomized trial. J Urol 158: 1408–1410PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Montorsi F, Salonia A, Barbieri L, Tommaso M, Zanoni M, Raber M, Bua L, Cestari A, Guazzoni G, Rigatti P (2002) The subsequent use of i.c. alprostadil and oral sildenafil is more efficacious than sildenafil alone in nerve sparing radical prostatectomy patients. J Urol 167 (Suppl): 279Google Scholar
  15. Montorsi F, Nathan H, McCullough A (2004) Tadalafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction following bilateral nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy: a randomized, double-blind placebo controlled trial. J Urol 172: 1036–1041PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Montorsi F, Brock G, Lee J, Shapiro J, van Poppel H, Graefen M, Stief C (2008) Effect of nightly versus on-demand vardenafil on recovery of erectile function in men following bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 924–931Google Scholar
  17. Mydlo JH, Viterbo R, Crispen P (2005) Use of combined intracorporeal injection and a phosphodiesterase-5-inhibitor therapy for men with a suboptimal response to sildenaffil and/or vardenafil monotherapy after radical retropubic prostatectomy. BJU 95: 843–846Google Scholar
  18. Noldus J, Michl U, Graefen M, Haese A, Hammerer P, Huland H (2002) Patient-reported sexual function after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Eur Urol 42: 118–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Podlasek C, Gonzalez C, Zelner D, Jiang H, McKenna K, McVary K (2001) Analysis of NOS isoform changes in a post radical prostatectomy model of erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 13: 1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rabbani F, Stapleton A, Kattan M, Wheeler T, Scardino P (2000) Factors predicting recovery of erections after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 164: 1929–1934PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Raina R, Agarwal A, Zippe C (2002) Early use of vacuum constriction device following radical prostatectomy facilitates early sexual activity and potential return of erection. J Urol 167 (Suppl): 279Google Scholar
  22. Raina R, Nelson D, Agarwal A, Lakin M, Klein E, Zippe C (2002b) Longterm efficacy of sildenafil citrate following radical prostatectomy: 3 year follow-up. J Urol Suppl 167: 279Google Scholar
  23. Rodriguez Vela L, Gonzalvo Ibarra A, Bono Arino A, Benejam Gual J, Guesta Presedo J, Rioja Sanz L (1997) Erectile Dysfunction after radical prostatectomy etiopathology and treatment. Acta Urol Esp 21: 909–921Google Scholar
  24. Salonia A, Gallina A, Zanni G, Briganti A, Deho F, Saccà A, Suardi N, Barbieri A, Guazzoni G, Rigatti P, Montorsi F (2008) Acceptance of and discontinuitation rate from erectile dysfunction oral treatment in patients following bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2008: 564–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schroeder-Printzen I, Schroeder-Printzen J, Hauck E, Weidner W (2005) Kosten einer Fertilitäts-und ED-Therapie. Urologe 44: 1179–1182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sperling H, Noldus J (2003) Prostatakarzinom und Erektile Dysfunktion — welche Therapie wann? Urologe A 42: 1351–1356PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Van Randenborgh H, Paul R, Breul J, Hartung R (2002) Do urologists treat erectile dysfuntion in patients after radical prostatectomy) Results of a questionnaire in 530 patients. J Urol 167 (Suppl): 282Google Scholar
  28. Weber D, Bieri S, Kurtz J, Miralbell R (1999) Prospective pilot study of sildenafil for treatment of postradiotherapy erectile dysfunciton in patients with prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 17: 3444–3449PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Zippe C, Kedia A, Kedia K, Nelson D, Agarwal A (1998) Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction After Radical Prostatectomy With Sildenafil Citrate (Viagra). Urology 52: 963–966PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zippe C, Jhaveri F, Klein E, Kedia S, Pasqualotto F, Kedia A, Agarwal A, Montague D, Lakin M (2000) Role of viagra after radical prostatectomy. Urology 55: 241–245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. Dombo
    • 1
  • Mark Goepel
    • 2
  • Guido Müller
    • 3
  • Ullrich Otto
    • 4
  • Herbert Rübben
    • 5
  • Herbert Sperling
    • 6
  1. 1.Kassel
  2. 2.Klinik für Urologie, Kinderurologie und Urologische OnkologieKlinikum NiederbergVelbert
  3. 3.Klinik QuellentalBad Wildungen
  4. 4.Rehabiltationsabt. Urologie/OnkologieKlinik QuellentalBad Wildungen
  5. 5.Klinik u. Poliklinik für UrologieUniversitätsklinikum EssenEssen
  6. 6.Klinik f. Urologie Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH KrankenhausSt. FranziskusMönchengladbach

Personalised recommendations