The Implementation of European Best Execution Obligations - An Analysis for the German Market -

  • Peter Gomber
  • Gregor Pujol
  • Adrian Wranik
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 23)


Since 01 November 2007 the provisions of the “Markets in Financial Instruments Directive” (MiFID) have to be applied by investment firms and regulated markets. This key date marks the (provisional) completion of a legislative process of the European Union which took several years. One major aspect of regulation concerns the best execution of client orders. Investment firms are obliged to make adequate provisions including processes and IT systems for order routing to achieve the best possible result (“best execution arrangements”) and to disclose sufficient information of the most important measures to their clients (“best execution policies”). This paper presents the results of an analysis of 75 best execution policies from the 100 largest German financial institutions and the 15 largest online brokers in Germany with regard to the fulfillment of the statutory minimum requirements, identifiable “best practices” and the execution venues on which investment firms place significant reliance in meeting the best execution requirement.


MiFID best execution best execution policy order routing systems 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Macey, J., O’Hara, M.: The Law and Economics of Best Execution. Journal of Financial Intermediation 6(3), 188–223 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    McCleskey, S.: Achieving Market Integration - Best Execution, Fragmentation and the Free Flow of Capital. Butterworth-Heinemann, Elsevier (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Roll, R.: A simple implicit measure of the bid-ask spread in an efficient market. Journal of Finance 39(4), 1127–1139 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stoll, H.R.: Inferring the components of the bid-ask spread: theory and empirical tests. Journal of Finance 44(1), 115–134 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Huang, R.D., Stoll, H.R.: Dealer versus auction markets: A paired comparison of execution costs on NASDAQ and the NYSE. Journal of Financial Economics 41(3), 313–357 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Jong, F., Nijman, T., Roell, A.: A comparison of the cost of trading French shares on the Paris Bourse and on Seaq International. European Economic Revue 39(7), 1277–1301 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bacidore, J., Ross, K., Sofianos, G.: Quantifying best execution at the NYSE, Working paper, New York Stock Exchange (1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gomber, P., Chlistalla, M., Gsell, M., Pujol, G., Steenbergen, J.: Umsetzung der MiFID in Deutschland - Empirische Studien zu Status Quo und Entwicklung der MiFID-Readiness der deutschen Finanzindustrie, Books on Demand (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gomber, P., Chlistalla, M.: Implementing MiFID by European execution venues – Between threat and opportunity. Journal of Trading 3(2), 18–28 (Spring, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gomber, P., Pujol, G.: Best execution in electronic banking and brokerage: an analysis of business and technical requirements. International Journal of Electronic Banking 1(1), 1–15 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    European Commission: Commission Directive 2006/73/EC of 10 August 2006 implementing Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards organisational requirements and operating conditions for investment firms and defined terms for the purposes of that Directive (Text with EEA relevance), Official Journal of the European Union, L 241, 2.9.2006, pp. 26–58 (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    CESR: Best Execution under MiFID, Questions & Answers, Ref CEST/07-320 (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ende, B., Gomber, P., Lutat, M.: Smart Order Routing technology in the new European equity trading landscape, Working paper, Chair of e-Finance, University of Frankfurt (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Karsch, W.: Top 100 der deutschen Kreditwirtschaft: Auf Wachstumskurs, Die Bank; 2007, Heft 8, S. 34-37 (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kundisch, D., Holtmann, C.: Competition of Retail Trading Venues – Onlinebrokerage and Security Markets in Germany. In: Schlottmann, F., Seese, D., Weinhardt, C. (Hrsg.) Handbook on Information Technology in Finance, pp. 171–192. Springer, Berlin (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Gomber
    • 1
  • Gregor Pujol
    • 1
  • Adrian Wranik
    • 1
  1. 1.Goethe University Frankfurt, E-Finance Lab e.V.Frankfurt/MainGermany

Personalised recommendations