Summary
This chapter addresses two goals: The development of a structured method to aid intelligence and security analysts in assessing counterfactuals, and forming a structured method to educate (future) analysts in counterfactual reasoning. In order to pursue these objectives, I offer here an analysis of the purposes, problems, parts, and principles of applied counterfactual reasoning. In particular, the ways in which antecedent scenarios are selected and the ways in which scenarios are developed constitute essential (albeit often neglected) aspects of counterfactual reasoning. Both must be addressed to apply counterfactual reasoning effectively. Naturally, further issues remain, but these should serve as a useful point of departure. They are the beginning of a path to more rigorous and relevant counterfactual reasoning in intelligence analysis and counterterrorism.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bennett, J. 2003. A Philosophical Guide to Conditionals. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cowley, R., ed. 2000. What If? The World’s Foremost Military Historians Imagine What Might Have Been. New York: Berkley Books.
Cowley, R., ed. 2002. What If? 2: Eminent Historians Imagine What Might Have Been. New York: Berkley Books.
Cowley, R., ed. 2004. What Ifs of American History. New York: Berkley Books.
Elster, J. 1978. Logic and Society: Contradictions and Possible Worlds. UK: Wiley & Sons.
Fearon, J. 1991. Counterfactuals and hypothesis testing in political science. World Politics 43:169–195.
Fearon, J. 1996. Causes and counterfactuals in social science. In Counterfactual Thought Experiments in Global Politics: Logical, Methodological, and Psychological Perspectives 39–68. Ed. P. E. Tetlock and A. Belkin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Ferguson, N., ed. 1999. Virtual History: Alternatives and Counterfactuals. New York: Basic Books.
Fogel, R. W. 1964. Railroads and Economic Growth. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.
Hawthorn, G. 1991. Plausible Worlds: Possibility and Understanding in History and the Social Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Khong, Y. F. 1996. Confronting Hitler and its consequences. In Counterfactual Thought Experiments in Global Politics: Logical, Methodological, and Psychological Perspectives 95–118. Ed. P. E. Tetlock and A. Belkin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kvart, I. 1986. A Theory of Counterfactuals. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.
Kvart, I. 1992. Counterfactuals. Erkenntnis 36:139–179.
Kvart, I. 1994. Counterfactuals: Ambiguities, true premises, and knowledge. Synthese 100:133–164.
Lebow, R. N. 2000. What’s so different about a counterfactual? World Politics 52:550–585.
Lebow, R. N. 2001. Contingency, catalysts, and international systems change. Political Science Quarterly 115(4):591–616.
Lebow, R. N., and G. Breslauer. 2004. Leadership and the end of the Cold War. In Ending the Cold War: Interpretations, Causation and the Study of International Relations 161–188. Ed. R. K. Herrmann and R. N. Lebow. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lewis, D. 1973. Counterfactuals. Malden, MA: Basil Blackwell.
Lewis, D. 1979. Counterfactual dependence and time’s arrow. Nous 13:455–476.
Lewis, D. 1986. Postscripts to counterfactual dependence and time’s arrow. In Philosophical Papers, vol. 2, 52–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stalnaker, R. 1968. A theory of conditionals. In Studies in Logical Theory. Ed. N. Rescher. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tetlock, P. E., and A. Belkin. 1996. Counterfactual thought experiments in global politics: Logical, methodological, and psychological perspectives. In Counterfactual Thought Experiments in Global Politics: Logical, Methodological, and Psychological Perspectives 3–38. Ed. P. E. Tetlock and A. Belkin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Tsouras, P. G., ed. 2001. Rising Sun Victorious: The Alternate History of How the Japanese Won the Pacific War. London, UK: Greenhill Books.
Tsouras, P. G., ed. 2002. Third Reich Victorious: Alternate Decisions of WWII. London, UK: Greenhill Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hendrickson, N. (2009). Applied Counterfactual Reasoning. In: Argamon, S., Howard, N. (eds) Computational Methods for Counterterrorism. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01141-2_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01141-2_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-01140-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-01141-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)