Skip to main content

Spatial and Seasonal Simulations of Irrigated Processing Tomato

  • Conference paper
Crop Modeling and Decision Support
  • 2312 Accesses

Abstract

Crop simulation models are used to compare crop management techniques, allowing for multi-year and multi-location runs over minimum time intervals. In Southern Italy, where water- limited conditions are common, it is important to identify irrigation scenarios which allow for a more efficient transformation of water (and irrigation water) into commercial yield. In this research project, a spatial analysis of a long-term simulation was carried out with AEGIS/WIN, a GIS interface of the DSSAT crop simulation package. The case-study refers to a 1000 km2 area, characterized by 481 soil samples collected over a regular grid. The processing tomato was simulated punctual-based using long-term weather data. The evaluated crop management scenarios were a) rainfed and b) 13 automatic irrigation levels based on soil CAW thresholds. Commercial yield, water and irrigation water use efficiencies (WUE and IRRWUE respectively), and NR were evaluated for each soil sample in order to select the optimum irrigation scenario. This choice was based on different criteria which were defined taking into account the objectives of different stakeholders involved in the tomato crop chain. All the above variables were visualised and mapped with GIS. According to the criteria, the results of the rainfed scenario were not useful, showing low values for fruit yield and negative net returns for WUE. An increase in the threshold of soil water content in order to start irrigation improved the fruit yield, its temporal stability and the WUE. The overall mean of the IRRWUE decreased for thresholds of CAW higher than 50%. Results showed that the optimum CAW threshold was on average 45% for the different criteria parameters. The selection of the optimum scenarios based on yield and profitability were affected by the hydrological properties of the soils. The option criterion based on WUE maximisation proved to be suitable from different points of view and matched the interests of several stakeholders. In this work, a methodological approach is proposed for the spatial and temporal evaluation of irrigation scenarios, developing a support decision system for different stakeholders in planning irrigation water distribution. Some relationships among the stakeholders are also discussed, based on simulated results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 309.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Batchelor W D, Basso B, Paz J O (2002) Examples of strategies to analyze spatial and temporal variability using crop models. Eur J of Agron 18:141–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calixte J P, Beinroth F H, Jones J W, Lal H (1992) Linking DSSAT to a GIS. Agrotechnology Transfer 15:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dent J B, Thornton P K (1988) The role of Biological Simulation Models in Farming Systems Research. Agricultural Administration and Extension 29:111–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engel T, Hoogenboom G, James W J, Paul W W (1997) AEGIS/WIN: A computer program for the application of crop simulation models across geographic areas. Agron J 89:919–928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgiev G A, Hoogenboom G, Ragupathy K (1998) Regional yield estimation using a linked geographic information system, crop application of crop models and GIS. Agronomy abstracts Biol Eng 1st IBE Publ Athens GA 63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartkamp A D, de Beurs K, Stein A, White J W (1999b) Interpolation techniques for climate variables. CIMMyt, Mexico DF, NRG-GIS Series 99–01.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartkamp A D, White J W, Hoogenboom G (1999a) Interfacing geographic information systems with agronomic modeling. A review. Agron J 91:761–772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi K (2000) Multicriteria analysis for agricultural resource management: a critical survey and future perspectives. Eur J of Oper Res 122:486–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinemann A B, Hoogenboom G, de Faria R T (2002) Determination of spatial water requirements at county and regional levels using crop models and GIS. An example for the State of Parana, Brazil. Agric Water Manag 52:177–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoogenboom G, Thornton P K (1990) A GIS for agrotechnology transfer in Guatemala.. In Proc. Application of Geographic Information System, Simulation Models, and Knowledge-based Systems for land use management Blacksburg VA. 12–14 Nov 1990 Va Polytechnic Inst. & State Univ Blacksburg 61–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenks G F (1967) The Data Model Concept in Statistical Mapping. International Yearbook of Cartography 7:186–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones J W, Hoogenboom G, Porter C H, Boote K J, Batchelor W D, Hunt L A, Wilkens P W, Singh U, Gijsman A J, Ritchie J T (2003) The DSSAT cropping system model. Eur J of Agron 18:235–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews R (2002) Crop-soil simulation models: Applications in developing countries. CABI Publishing Matthews R and Stephens Weditors, Wallingford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nijbroek R, Hoogenboom G, Jones J W (2003) Optimizing irrigation management for a spatially variable soybean field. Agric Systems 76:359–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rinaldi M (2001) Durum wheat simulation in Southern Italy using CERES-Wheat model. I. Calibration and validation. In Proc of 2nd International Symposium “Modeling Cropping Systems” Florence (Italy) 16–18 July 81–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinaldi M (2004) Water availability at sowing and nitrogen management of durum wheat: a seasonal analysis with CERES-Wheat model. Field Crops Res 89:27–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rinaldi M, Borneo V (2006). Descrizione delle funzionalità di AEGIS/WIN, interfaccia GIS del software di simulazione colturale DSSAT. Un caso studio in Capitanata. Rivista Italiana di Agrometeorologia 2:34–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinaldi M, Flagella Z, Losavio N (2003) Evaluation and application of the OILCROP-SUN model for sunflower in Southern Italy. Agric Systems 78:17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rinaldi M, Ventrella D, Gagliano C (2007) Comparison of nitrogen and irrigation strategies in tomato using CROPGRO model. A case study from Southern Italy. Agric Water Manag 87:91–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rinaldi M, Ubaldo R (2007) Simulation at regional level of irrigated wheat and tomato in a Mediterranean environment. In “Water Resource Management IV” CA Brebbia & AG Kungolos (Editors) WIT Press (UK) WIT Transaction on Ecology and the Environment 103:569–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumpsi J M, Amador F, Romero C (1996) Theory and methodology On farmers’ objectives: a multicriteria approach. Eur J of Oper Res 96:64–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton P K, Saka A R, Singh U, Kumwenda J D T, Brink J E, Brisson N (1995) Application of a maize crop simulation model in the central region of Malawi. Exp Agric 31:213–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton P K, Hoogenboom G (1994) A computer program to analyze single-season crop model outputs. Agron J 86(5):860–868.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Tsinghua University Press, Beijing and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rinaldi, M., Ubaldo, R., Ruggieri, S. (2009). Spatial and Seasonal Simulations of Irrigated Processing Tomato. In: Cao, W., White, J.W., Wang, E. (eds) Crop Modeling and Decision Support. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01132-0_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics