Simulating Biomass and Grain Yields of Barley and Oat Crops with the Sirius Wheat Model
Mechanistic crop models have been used widely to simulate wheat crop responses to the environment. In contrast, there have been few attempts to model barley or oat responses using crop simulation models. This study used Sirius to simulate barley and oat crops from a range of sowing dates under good growing conditions. Simulations were conducted using Sirius, a crop model that was originally conceived for wheat but has a mechanistic framework that is sufficiently robust to be applied to other temperate cereals. The objective of this research was to test the processes operating within the model rather than simply applying it to predict final yields. Therefore, data sets were chosen that had intensive within-season measurements of leaf area index (LAI), biomass and grain yield.
All observed crops were grown at Lincoln, New Zealand, with water and nitrogen supply presumed to be non-limiting. The barley cultivars grown were ‘Triumph’, ‘Dash’, and ‘Valetta’ at five sowing dates and the oat cultivar grown was ‘Drummond’ at seven sowing dates. Sirius requires a small set of cultivar-specific parameters. Cultivar parameters for the phenology of ‘Drummond’ oats were taken from a previous experiment. A single cultivar description for ‘Triumph’ was used for all barley simulations. This cultivar description was based on wheat but with a more rapid phyllochron and a slightly modified LAI relationship with thermal conditions. Otherwise no modification was made to the model structure.
Time courses of crop and grain growth were generally well simulated by Sirius. Root mean squared deviations for final grain yield were 1.3 t ha−1 for barley and 1.0 t ha−1 for oats. Although there were some small errors in the simulation of LAI, these had only minor effects on simulated biomass and grain yields. However, for late autumn and early spring sowings of ‘Drummond’ oats LAI and biomass were over-predicted and for a mid spring sowing these parameters were under predicted. This error suggested that there is an aspect of phenological or canopy development not accounted for in Sirius. Overall, Sirius gave good predictions of biomass and grain yield of barley and oat crops under good growing conditions with little or no modification.
Keywordscereal crop modeling leaf area index
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Armour T, Jamieson P, Zyskowski R (2002) Testing the Sirius Wheat Calculator. Agron. NZ 32/33:1–6.Google Scholar
- Armour T, Jamieson P, Zyskowski R (2004a) Using the Sirius Wheat Calculator to manage wheat quality — The Canterbury experience. Agron NZ 34:171–176.Google Scholar
- Armour, T, Jamieson PD, Nicholls A, Zyskowski R (2004b) Breaking the 15 t/ha wheat yield barrier. Proceedings of the 14th International Crop Science Congress, “New directions for a diverse planet”, Brisbane, Australia, 26 Sep–1 Oct 2004.Google Scholar
- de Ruiter JM (1999) Yield and quality of malting barley (Hordeum vulgare L-‘Valetta’) in response to irrigation and nitrogen fertilisation. NZ J. Crop Hort. Sci. 27:307–317.Google Scholar
- de Ruiter JM, Stol W, van Keulen H (1993) Simulation of yield and quality of malting barley. Agron. NZ 23:11–19.Google Scholar
- FAO (2008) FAOSTAT [Online] http://FAOstat.fao.org.Google Scholar
- Jamieson PD, Munro CA (2000) The calibration of a model for daylength responses in spring wheat for large numbers of cultivars. Agron. NZ 30:25–28.Google Scholar
- Jamieson PD, Martin RJ, Francis GS (1995a) Drought Influences on Grain-Yield of Barley, Wheat, and Maize. NZ J. Crop Hort. Sci. 23:55–66.Google Scholar
- Kemanian AR, Stockle CO, Huggins DR (2004) Variability of barley radiation-use efficiency. Crop Sci. 44:1662–1672.Google Scholar
- Martin RJ (1996) The effect of sowing date on growth and yield of two cultivars of oats. Agron. NZ 26:51–59.Google Scholar
- Martin RJ, Jamieson PD, Wilson DR, Francis GS (1992) Effects of soil moisture deficits on yield and quality of ‘Russet Burbank’ potatoes. NZ J. Crop Hort. Sci. 20:1–9.Google Scholar
- Martin RJ, Jamieson PD, Gillespie RN, Maley S (2001) Effect of timing and intensity of drought on the yield of oats (Avena sativa L.). Proceedings of the 10th Australian Agronomy Conference, “Science and Technology: Delivering Results for Agriculture”.Google Scholar
- Monsi M, Saeki T (1953). Über den Lichtfaktor in den Pflanzengesellschaften und seine Bedeutung für die Stoffproduktion. Jap. J. Bot. 14:22–52.Google Scholar
- Sonego M (2000) Effect of temperature and daylength on phenological development of oats (Avena sativa L.), Lincoln University, Canterbury.Google Scholar
- Sonego M, Jamieson PD, Moot DJ, Martin RJ (1997) Phenological development of oat crops in response to sowing dates. Agron. NZ 27:115–118.Google Scholar