Skip to main content

Applications of Stakeholder Engagement and Eco-Efficiency as Enablers of Corporate Responsibility in the Australian Mining and Minerals Processing Industry

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mining, Society, and a Sustainable World

Abstract

This chapter describes case studies of community engagement and eco-efficiency across the Australian mining and minerals industry. Eco-efficiency includes new processes, systems, and initiatives for improving air quality, energy, and materials efficiency, waste minimisation, improved waste water management, and increased water use efficiencies across several sectors of the mining and minerals processing industry. Specific findings were as follows: (1) environmental and social improvements at operations and within communities in which they operate can realise economic benefits and will not always incur a major financial cost; (2) local communities provide the means by which a mining or minerals processing operation can realise its full potential in contributing to a region’s economic and social well-being; (3) improvements to waste management practises and waste prevention can lead to cost reductions or even increased revenues; (4) water efficiency improvements will be needed by any mining company planning to remain viable in the future, particularly in Australia; (5) at the operations level, there needs to be clear commitment from senior management to make the case for change to a more sustainable mining or minerals processing operation; and (6) mining companies need to work closely with businesses and suppliers to identify new processes that enhance the sustainability of their businesses.

The views presented in this chapter are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of his employer, Telstra Corporation Limited.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.minerals.org.au/enduringvalue

  2. 2.

    http://www.icmm.com/our-work/sustainable-development-framework/10-principles

  3. 3.

    http://www.sustainability-index.com

  4. 4.

    http://www.corporate-responsibility.com.au

  5. 5.

    In January 2009, BHP Billiton announced that it would immediately commence the indefinite suspension of the Ravensthorpe Nickel Operation due to reduced prices for nickel and increasing capital costs.

References

  • Altham J, Guerin TF (2005) Cleaner production. In: Rajaram V, Dutta S, Parameswaran K, editors. Sustainable Mining Practices. London: A.A. Balkema Publishers (Francis & Taylor Group Plc), pp. 93–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (2008) Australian Government Department of Land & Water: Eco-Efficiency & Cleaner Production Case Studies by Industry Type. From http://www.environment.gov.au, accessed on 1 August 2008

  • Azapagic A (2004) Developing a framework for sustainable development indicators for the mining and minerals industry. Journal of Cleaner Production 12(6): 639–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blignaut JN, Hassan RM (2002) Assessment of the performance and sustainability of mining sub-soil assets for economic development in South Africa. Ecological Economics 40(1): 89–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boutilier R, Thomson I (2003) Assessing the state of stakeholder relationships. Mining Environmental Management March: 12–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridge G (2004) Contested terrain: Mining and the environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 29: 205–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooney JP (2000) People, participation and partnership. CIM Bulletin 93(1037): 46–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Cragg AW (1998) Sustainable development and mining: Opportunity or threat to the industry? CIM Bulletin 91(1023): 45–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Glauser S, McAllister ML, Milioli G (2005) The challenges of sustainability in mining regions: The coal mining region of Santa Catarina, Brazil. Natural Resources Forum 29(1): 1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerin TF (2006a) A survey of sustainable development initiatives in the Australian mining and minerals industry. Minerals & Energy – Raw Materials Report 20(3): 11–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerin TF (2006b) Realising minerals theories “Down Under”. Mining Environmental Management March: 12–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerin TF (2006c) Cleaning up the act [sustainable development in mining industry]. Materials World 14(8): 28

    Google Scholar 

  • Habirono H (2001) Community based sustainable development: A corporate social responsibility. Mining Environmental Management July: 13–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Haile S (1998) Environmental management systems and cleaner production. Journal of Environmental Planning & Management 41(2): 268–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilson G, Basu AJ (2003) Devising indicators of sustainable development for the mining and minerals industry: An analysis of critical background issues. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 10(4): 319–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins M (2007) Corporate Social Responsibility. London, England: Earthscan

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys D (2000) A business perspective on community relations in mining. Resources Policy 26(3): 127–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins H, Yakovleva N (2006) Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: Exploring trends in social and environmental disclosure. Journal of Cleaner Production 14(3–4): 271–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low N, Gleeson B (1998) Situating justice in the environment: The case of BHP at the Ok Tedi copper mine. Antipode 30(3): 201–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAllister ML, Scoble M, Veiga M (1999) Sustainability and the Canadian mining industry at home and abroad. CIM Bulletin 92(1033): 85–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Mtegha HD, Cawood FT, Minnitt RCA (2007) National minerals policies and stakeholder participation for broad-based development in the southern African development community (SADC). Resources Policy 31(4): 231–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newbold J (2003) Social consequences of mining and present day solutions – Region II in Chile highlighted. Sustainable Development 11(2): 84–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzer H (1995) Environment and innovation: Introducing cleaner production. Innovation 8(3): 309–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon F, Katz E, Lovel R (2007) Social Dimensions of Mining in Australia – Understanding the Minerals Industry as a Social Landscape. Melbourne, Australia: CSIRO

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele BW (1996) Product stewardship at Dofasco: A discussion paper. Canadian Mining and Metallurgical Bulletin 89(999): 71–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Togolo M, Rae M, Omundsen T (2001) Meeting society’s expectations through stakeholder engagement. Mining Environmental Management March: 10–11

    Google Scholar 

  • van Berkel R, Narayanaswamy V (2004) Sustainability as a framework for innovation in minerals processing. Journal of the Australian Institute of Mining & Metallurgy July/August: 80–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson J (2002) Cleaner coal technology transfer to China: A ‘win-win’ opportunity for sustainable development? International Journal of Technology Transfer & Commercialisation 1(4): 347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) (1987) Our Common Future, Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development (the Brundtland Commission). Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Turlough F. Guerin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Guerin, T.F. (2009). Applications of Stakeholder Engagement and Eco-Efficiency as Enablers of Corporate Responsibility in the Australian Mining and Minerals Processing Industry. In: Richards, J. (eds) Mining, Society, and a Sustainable World. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01103-0_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics