Skip to main content

On Uncertainty and Robustness in Evolutionary Optimization-Based MCDM

  • Conference paper
Book cover Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization (EMO 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 5467))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this article we present a methodological framework entitled ‘Analysis of Uncertainty and Robustness in Evolutionary Optimization’ or AUREO for short. This methodology was developed as a diagnosis tool to analyze the characteristics of the decision-making problems to be solved with Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms (MOEA) in order to: 1) determine the mathematical program that represents best the current problem in terms of the available information, and 2) to help the design or adaptation of the MOEA meant to solve the mathematical program. Regarding the first point, the different versions of decision-making problems in the presence of uncertainty are reduced to a few classes, while for the second point possible configurations of MOEA are suggested in terms of the type of uncertainty and the theory used to represent it. Finally, the AUREO has been introduced and tested successfully in different applications in [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Salazar Aponte, D.E.: On Uncertainty and Robustness in Evolutionary Optimization-based Multi-Criterion Decision-Making, PhD Thesis, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jousselme, A.L., Maupin, P., Bossé, E.: Uncertainty in a situation analysis perspective. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of Information Fusion 2003, pp. 1207–1214 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Klir, G.J., Folger, T.A.: Fuzzy Sets, Uncertainty, and Information. Prentice-Hall International, USA (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferson, S., Kreinovich, V., Ginzburg, L., Myers, D.S., Sentz, K.: Constructing probability boxes and Dempster-Shafer structures. Technical report SAND2002-4015, Sandia National Laboratories (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Walley, P.: Statistical Reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities. Chapman and Hall, London (1991)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Kröger, R.: On the variance of fuzzy random variables. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 92(1), 83–93 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: The mean value of a fuzzy interval. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 24(3), 279–300 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Bronevich, A.G.: The Maximal Variance of Fuzzy Interval. In: Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Imprecise Probabilities and Their Applications ISIPTA 2003. Electronic proceedings (2003), http://www.carleton-scientific.com/isipta/2003-toc.html

  9. Carlsson, C., Fullér, R.: On possibilistic mean value and variance of fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 122, 315–326 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Kreinovich, V., Xiang, G., Ferson, S.: Computing mean and variance under Dempster-Shafer uncertainty: Towards faster algorithms. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 42(3), 212–227 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Bruns, M., Paredis, C., Ferson, S.: Computational Methods for Decision Making Based on Imprecise Information. In: NSF Workshop on Reliable Engineering Computing, Savannah, GA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Teich, J.: Pareto-front exploration with uncertain objectives. In: Zitzler, E., Deb, K., Thiele, L., Coello Coello, C.A., Corne, D.W. (eds.) EMO 2001. LNCS, vol. 1993, pp. 314–328. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Hughes, E.J.: Constraint Handling with Uncertain and Noisy Multi-Objective Evolution. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation 2001 (CEC 2001), pp. 963–970. IEEE Service Center, Piscataway (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fieldsend, J.E., Everson, R.M.: Multi-objective Optimisation in the Presence of Uncertainty. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC 2005), pp. 243–250. IEEE Service Center, Edinburgh (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Basseur, M., Zitzler, E.: Handling Uncertainty in Indicator-Based Multiobjective Optimization. Int. J. Computational Intelligence Research 2(3), 255–272 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Sörensen, K.: A framework for robust and flexible optimisation using metaheuristics. OR4: A Quarterly Journal of Operations Research 1(4), 341–345 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Ray, T.: Constrained robust optimal design using a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm. In: IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC 2002), pp. 419–424. IEEE Service Center, Honolulu (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Deb, K., Gupta, H.: Searching for robust pareto-optimal solutions in multi-objective optimization. In: Coello Coello, C.A., Hernández Aguirre, A., Zitzler, E. (eds.) EMO 2005. LNCS, vol. 3410, pp. 150–164. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Barrico, C., Henggeler Antunes, C.: Robustness Analysis in Multi-Objective Optimization Using a Degree of Robustness Concept. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC 2006), pp. 1887–1892. IEEE Service Center, Vancouver (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lim, D., Ong, Y.S., Jin, Y., Sendhoff, B., Lee, B.S.: Inverse Multi-objective Robust Evolutionary Design. Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines Journal 7(4), 383–404 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Deb, K., Padmanabhan, D., Gupta, S., Mall, A.K.: Reliability-based multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. In: Obayashi, S., Deb, K., Poloni, C., Hiroyasu, T., Murata, T. (eds.) EMO 2007. LNCS, vol. 4403, pp. 66–80. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Limbourg, P.: Multi-objective optimization of problems with epistemic uncertainty. In: Coello Coello, C.A., Hernández Aguirre, A., Zitzler, E. (eds.) EMO 2005. LNCS, vol. 3410, pp. 413–427. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Limbourg, P., Salazar Aponte, D.E.: An Optimization Algorithm for Imprecise Multi-Objective Problem Functions. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC 2005), pp. 459–466. IEEE Service Center, Edinburgh (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Graves, S.: Probabilistic dominance criteria for comparing uncertain alternatives: A tutorial. Omega 37(2), 346–357 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Limbourg, P., Kochs, H.D.: Multi-objective optimization of generalized reliability design problems using feature models–A concept for early design stages. Reliab. Eng. Sys. Saf. 93(6), 815–828 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hernandes, F., Lamata, M.T., Verdagay, J.L., Yamakami, A.: The shortest path problem on networks with fuzzy parameters. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 158(14), 1561–1570 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Salazar, A., D.E., Rocco, S., C.M.: Solving Advanced Multi-Objective Robust Designs By Means Of Multiple Objective Evolutionary Algorithms (MOEA): A Reliability Application. Reliab. Eng. Sys. Saf. 92(6), 697–706 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Salazar, D., Gandibleux, X., Jorge, J., Sevaux, M.: A Robust-Solution-Based Methodology to Solve Multiple-Objective Problems with Uncertainty. In: Barichard, V., Ehrgott, M., Gandibleux, X., T’Kindt, V. (eds.) ) Multiobjective Programming and Goal Programming. LNEMS, vol. 618, pp. 197–207. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Ulungu, E.L., Teghem, J., Fortemps, P.H., Tuyttens, D.: MOSA Method: A Tool for Solving Multiobjective Combinatorial Optimization Problems. J. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 8, 221–236 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Salazar Aponte, D.E., Rocco S., C.M., Galván, B. (2009). On Uncertainty and Robustness in Evolutionary Optimization-Based MCDM. In: Ehrgott, M., Fonseca, C.M., Gandibleux, X., Hao, JK., Sevaux, M. (eds) Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization. EMO 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5467. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01020-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01020-0_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-01019-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-01020-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics