Abstract
Appropriate investment and management of infrastructure is an important issue in national or regional planning. Aschauer (1989) reported two important findings: that infrastructure productivity was significantly higher than expected, and that fewer investments in the USA after 1970 would result in less growth of national productivity. Since then, measurement of infrastructure productivity has become a focal issue in national or regional management policy, and a large number of empirical studies have accumulated; see Sturm (1998). An aggregate production function approach for time-series applied in Aschauer’s study, however, was criticized by economists, or econometricians. Among the assumptions inherent in the production function approach, “constant return to scale” and “competitive input factor market” are often viewed with suspicion from the viewpoint of the endogenous growth theory by Romer (1986) and Lucus (1988) or from an uncompetitive structure of infrastructure market, respectively. Basu and Fernald (1997) empirically tested these assumptions with the production function approach, based on data from 34 sectors of US industries. They concluded that in some segmented sectors of industry, the constant return to scale assumption was violated but that it held true in most sectors. Holtz-Eakin and Lovely (1996) analyzed the effect of infrastructure on economic activities by using a general equilibrium system explicitly considering scale economies. They showed that infrastructure decreases the input factor cost, increases the variety of industries, and increases the number of newly founded companies. Haughwout (2002) applied the spatial equilibrium theory considering regional monopolistic power over input factor market, and measured infrastructure productivity. This study showed that infrastructure provided significant marginal benefit on regional economic activities. Most studies have reported that there is a positive production/cost reduction effect caused by infrastructure, but unfortunately, some studies have paid little attention to the data generation process that significantly influences findings through model specifications. Recent American, European, and Japanese studies about the production function approach have been widely reviewed by Ejiri et al. (2001).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Agiakloglou C, Newbold P (1994) Lagrange multiplier tests for fractional difference. J Time Series Anal 15:253–262
Almon S (1965) The distributed lag between capital appropriation and expenditures. Econometrica 33:178–196
Aschauer D (1989) Is public expenditure productive? J Monet Econ 23:177–200
Baltagi B, Song S, Jung B (2001) The unbalanced nested error component regression model. J Econom 101:357–381
Barkoulas T, Baum F, Chakraborty A (2001) Waves and persistence in merger and acquisition activity. Econom Lett 70:237–243
Basu S, Fernald J (1997) Returns to scale in U.S. production: estimates and implications. J Polit Econ 105:249–283
Beran J (1992) Statistical methods for data with long-range dependence. Stat Sci 7:404–427
Bhardwai G, Swanson N (2006) An empirical investigation of the usefulness of ARFIMA models for predicting macroeconomic and financial time series. J Econom 121:539–578
Box P, Jenkins M, Reinsel C (1994) Time series analysis: forecasting and control, 3rd edn. Prentice hall, New York
Box-Steffensmeier M, Tomlinson R (2000) Fractional integration methods in political science. Elect Stud 19:63–76
Cheung Y, Lai K (2001) Long memory and nonlinear mean reversion in Japanese yen-based real exchange rate. J Int Money Finance 20:115–132
Chung F, Baillie R (1993) Small sample biases in conditional sum-of-squares estimators of fractionally integrated ARMA process. Empir Econ 18:791–806
Davidson J, Sibbertsen P (2005) Generating schemes for long memory processes: regimes, aggregation and nonlinearlity. J Econom 128:253–282
Dfrenot G, Guegan D, Peguin-Feissolle A (2005) Long-memory dynamics in a SETAR mode – applications to stock markets. Journal of Financ Mark Inst Money 15:391–406
Doi T (2003) http://www.econ.keio.ac.jp/staff/tdoi/index-J.html (in Japanese)
Duggal V, Saltzman C, Klein L (1999) Infrastructure and productivity: a nonlinear approach. J Econom 92:47–74
Ejiri R, Okumura M, Kobayashi K (2001), Productivity of social capital and economic growth: state of the art. J Infrastruct Plann Manage 688/IV-53:75–87 (in Japanese)
Everaert G, Heylen F (2001) Public capital and productivity growth: evidence for Belgium, 1953–1996. Econ Model 18:97–116
Godfrey L (1979) Testing the adequacy of a time series model. Biometrica 66:62–72
Gonzalo J, Lee T (1998) Pitfalls in testing for long run relationships. J Econom 86:129–154
Gourierouex C, Monfort A (1997) Time series and dynamic models. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Granger CWJ, Joyeux R (1980) An introduction to long-memory time series models and fractional differencing. J Time Series Anal 1:15–29
Haughwout A (2002) Public infrastructure investments, productivity and welfare in fixed geographic areas. J Public Econ 83:405–428
Henry T, Olekalns N (2002) Does the Australian dollar real exchange rate display mean reversion? J Int Money Finance 21:651–666
Holtz-Eakin D, Lovely M (1996) Scale economies, returns to variety, and productivity of public infrastructure. Reg Sci Urban Econ 26:105–123
Hosking J (1981) Fractional differencing. Biometrika 68:165–176
Hosking J (1996) Asymptotic distributions of the sample mean, auto-covariances, and autocorrelations of long-memory time series. J Econom 73:261–284
Igresias P, Jorquera H, Palma W (2006) Data analysis using regression models with missing observations and long-memory: an application study. Comput Stat Data Anal 50:2028–2043
Jhun M, Song S, Jung B (2003) BLUP in the nested regression model with serially correlated errors. Comput Stat Data Anal 44:77–88
Lucus R (1988) On the mechanics of economic development. J Monet Econ 22:3–42
Michelacci C (2004) Cross-sectional heterogeneity and persistence of aggregate fluctuations. J Monet Econ 51:3121–1352
Minotani C (1995) Differencing and Integral for economic analysis. Taga-Shuppan, Tokyo
Moran P (1948) The interpretation of statistical maps. J R Stat Soc B 10:243–251
Munnel H (1992) Policy watch: infrastructure investment and economic growth. J Econ Perspect 6:189–198
Patel A, Shoesmith G (2004) Term structure linkages surrounding the Plaza and Louvre accords:evidence from Euro-rates and long-memory components. J Bank Finance 28:2051–2075
Robinson P, Hidalgo F (2003) Time-series regression with long-range dependence. In: Robinson PM (ed) Time series with long memory. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 305–333
Romer M (1986) Increasing returns and long-run growth. J Polit Econ 94:1002–1037
Shiller J (1973) A distributed lag estimator derived from smoothness priors. Econometrica 41:775–778
Smith J, Taylor N, Yadav S (1997) Comparing the bias and misspecification in ARFIMA models. J Time Series Anal 18:507–527
Strum E, de Haan J (1995) Technological change and aggregate production function. Rev Econ Stat 39:312–320
Sturm E (1998) Public capital expenditure in OECD countries. The causes and impact of the decline in public capital spending. Edward Elger, Cheltenham
Tanaka K (1999) The non-stationary fractional unit root. Econom Theory 15:549–582
Tsukai M, Ejiri R, Okumur M, Kobayashi K (2002) Productivity of infrastructure and spillover effects. J Infrastruct Plann Manage 716/IV-57:53–67 (in Japanese)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Makoto, T., Kiyoshi, K. (2009). Infrastructure Productivity with a Long Persistent Effect. In: Karlsson, C., Andersson, A., Cheshire, P., Stough, R. (eds) New Directions in Regional Economic Development. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01017-0_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01017-0_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-01016-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-01017-0
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)