Inferring POP-Level ISP Topology through End-to-End Delay Measurement

  • Kaoru Yoshida
  • Yutaka Kikuchi
  • Masateru Yamamoto
  • Yoriko Fujii
  • Ken’ichi Nagami
  • Ikuo Nakagawa
  • Hiroshi Esaki
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5448)

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a new topology inference technique that aims to reveals how ISPs deploy their layer two and three networks at the POP level, without relying on ISP core network information such as router hops and domain names. This is because, even though most of previous works in this field leverage core network information to infer ISP topologies, some of our measured ISPs filter ICMP packets and do not allow us to access core network information through traceroute. And, several researchers point out that such information is not always reliable. So, to infer ISP core network topology without relying on ISP releasing information, we deploy systems to measure end-to-end communication delay between residential users, and map the collected delay and corresponding POP-by-POP paths. In our inference process, we introduce assumptions about how ISPs tend to deploy their layer one and two networks. To validate our methodology, we measure end-to-end communication delay of four nationwide ISPs between thirteen different cities in Japan and infer their POP-level topologies.

Keywords

End-to-end measurement network tomography communication delay Japanese Internet 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Spring, N., Mahajan, R., Wetherall, D., Anderson, T.: Measuring ISP topologies with rocketfuel. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 12(1), 2–16 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Teixeira, R., Marzullo, K., Savage, S., Voelker, G.M.: In search of path diversity in ISP networks. In: IMC 2003: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement, pp. 313–318. ACM, New York (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhang, M., Ruan, Y., Pai, V., Rexford, J.: How dns misnaming distorts internet topology mapping. In: ATEC 2006: Proceedings of the annual conference on USENIX 2006 Annual Technical Conference, Berkeley, CA, USA, USENIX Association, pp. 34–34 (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jacobson, V.: pathchar — a tool to infer characteristics of Internet paths, MSRI Presentation (April 1997)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Okamoto, K.: Fundamentals of Optical Waveguides. Academic Press, San Diego (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Augustin, B., Cuvellier, X., Orgogozo, B., Viger, F., Friedman, T., Latapy, M., Magnien, C., Teixeira, R.: Avoiding traceroute anomalies with Paris traceroute. In: IMC 2006: Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement, pp. 153–158. ACM, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Coates, A., Hero, Nowak, R., Yu, B.: Internet tomography. Signal Processing Magazine 19(3), 47–65 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rabbat, M., Coates, M., Nowak, R.D.: Multiple-Source Internet Tomography. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 24(12), 2221–2234 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yoshida, K., Fujii, Y., Kikuchi, Y., Yamamoto, M., Nagami, K., Nakagawa, I., Esaki, H.: A Trend Analysis of Delay and Packet Loss in Broadband Internet Environment through End Customers View. IEICE Transaction on Communications J91-B(10), 1182–1192 (2008) (in Japanese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kaoru Yoshida
    • 1
  • Yutaka Kikuchi
    • 2
  • Masateru Yamamoto
    • 3
  • Yoriko Fujii
    • 4
  • Ken’ichi Nagami
    • 5
  • Ikuo Nakagawa
    • 5
  • Hiroshi Esaki
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of Information Science and TechnologyThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Kochi University of TechnologyJapan
  3. 3.Cyberlinks co.,LTDJapan
  4. 4.Keio UniversityJapan
  5. 5.Intec Netcore, Inc.Japan

Personalised recommendations