Quantifying the Extent of IPv6 Deployment

  • Elliott Karpilovsky
  • Alexandre Gerber
  • Dan Pei
  • Jennifer Rexford
  • Aman Shaikh
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5448)

Abstract

Our understanding of IPv6 deployment is surprisingly limited. In fact, it is not even clear how we should quantify IPv6 deployment. In this paper, we collect and analyze a variety of data to characterize the penetration of IPv6. We show that each analysis leads to somewhat different conclusions. For example: registry data shows IPv6 address allocations are growing rapidly, yet BGP table dumps indicate many addresses are either never announced or announced long after allocation; Netflow records from a tier-1 ISP show growth in native IPv6 traffic, but deeper analysis reveals most of the traffic is DNS queries and ICMP packets; a more detailed inspection of tunneled IPv6 traffic uncovers many packets exchanged between IPv4-speaking hosts (e.g., to traverse NAT boxes). Overall, our study suggests that from our vantage points, current IPv6 deployment appears somewhat experimental, and that the growth of IPv6 allocations, routing announcements, and traffic volume probably indicate more operators and users are preparing themselves for the transition to IPv6.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    ARIN public stats, ftp://ftp.arin.net/pub/stats/
  3. 3.
    Meyer, D.: University of Oregon Route Views Archive Project, http://archive.routeviews.org/
  4. 4.
    IPv6 Global Unicast Address Assignments (May 2008), http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv6-unicast-address-assignments
  5. 5.
    Hinden, B.: 6bone Phaseout Planning (March 2003), http://go6.net/ipv6.pdf
  6. 6.
    ARIN Number Resource Policy Manual (August 2008), http://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html
  7. 7.
    IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy (August 2008), http://www.apnic.net/policy/ipv6-address-policy.html
  8. 8.
    Policy - AfriNIC IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy (March 2004), http://www.afrinic.net/docs/policies/afpol-v6200407-000.htm
  9. 9.
    Roseman, B.: ASO Statement Regarding IPv6 Policy Adoption (July 2002), http://www.icann.org/en/aso/ipv6-statement-11jul02.htm
  10. 10.
    Meng, X., Xu, Z., Zhang, B., Huston, G., Lu, S., Zhang, L.: IPv4 address allocation and the BGP routing table evolution. In: SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
    Malone, D.: Observations of IPv6 addresses. In: Claypool, M., Uhlig, S. (eds.) PAM 2008. LNCS, vol. 4979, pp. 21–30. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Narten, T., Draves, R., Krishnan, S.: Privacy Extensions for Stateless Address Autoconfiguration in IPv6 (September 2007), http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4941
  14. 14.
    Domain Name System Client Behavior in Windows Vista (September 2006), http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb727035.aspx
  15. 15.
    SixXS - IPv6 Deployment & Tunnel Broker :: IPv6 BitTorrent Clients (September 2008), http://www.sixxs.net/tools/tracker/clients/
  16. 16.
    Forum.utorrent.com / uTorrent 1.8 released (August 2008), http://forum.utorrent.com/viewtopic.php?id=44003
  17. 17.
    Huffaker, B., Claffy, K.: Caida: research: topology: as_core_network, http://www.caida.org/research/topology/as_core_network/ipv6.xml
  18. 18.
    Hoerdt, M., Magoni, D.: Distribution of multicast tree states over the IPv6 network topology. In: 2004 IEEE Conference on Communications (2004)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Huston, G.: IPv6 Reports, http://bgp.potaroo.net/index-v6.html
  20. 20.
    Smith, P.: IPv6 Hour at NANOG42 (January 2008), http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0802/ipv6hour.html
  21. 21.
    Doyle, J.: IPv6 Hour at NANOG: A Follow-Up (February 2008), http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/25276
  22. 22.
    Iekel-Johnson, S., Labovitz, C., McPherson, D., Ringberg, H.: Tracking the IPv6 Migration (2008), http://www.arbornetworks.com/IPv6research
  23. 23.
    Savola, P.: Observations of IPv6 Traffic on a 6to4 Relay. In: ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review (January 2005)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hei, Y., Yamazaki, K.: Traffic analysis and worldwide operation of open 6to4 relays for IPv6 deployment. In: 2004 Symposium on Applications and the Internet (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elliott Karpilovsky
    • 1
  • Alexandre Gerber
    • 2
  • Dan Pei
    • 2
  • Jennifer Rexford
    • 1
  • Aman Shaikh
    • 2
  1. 1.Princeton UniversityUSA
  2. 2.AT&T Labs – ResearchUSA

Personalised recommendations