Supporting Enterprise-Grade Audio Conferencing on the Internet

  • Krishna Ramachandran
  • Sunitha Beeram
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5448)

Abstract

This paper evaluates if the Internet can support enterprise-grade audio conferencing. For our investigation, we collect real-world traffic traces from the audio conferencing solution in GoToMeeting, a popular online meeting application. We analyze these traces using Conference MOS, a new metric proposed in this paper to measure the quality of an audio conference. Our results indicate that a majority of users experience good conference quality. A small percentage of users that experience poor quality because of high delay and loss would be better served with PSTN. This leads us to believe that an enterprise-grade solution should adopt a combined VoIP and PSTN deployment strategy over a VoIP only solution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Citrix GoToMeeting, http://www.gotomeeting.com
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    North American Audio Conferencing Services Markets, http://www.mindbranch.com/North-American-Audio-R1-6595/
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Methods for Subjective Determination of Transmission Quality. In: ITU-T P.800 (1996)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    E-model, a Computation Model for use in Transmission Planning. In: ITU-T G.107 (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mean Opinion Score (MOS) Terminology. In: ITU-T P.800.1 (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Provisional Impairment Factor Framework for Wideband Speech Transmission. In: ITU-T G.107 Amendment 1 (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Amir, Y., Danilov, C., Goose, S., Hedgvist, D., Terzis, A.: 1-800-OVERLAYS: Using Overlay Networks to Improve VoIP Quality. In: ACM NOSSDAV, Stevenson, WA (June 2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Birke, R., Mellia, M., Petracca, M.: Understanding VoIP from Backbone Measurements. In: IEEE Infocom, Anchorage, AL (May 2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bolot, J., Crepin, H., Vega-Garcia, A.: Analysis of Audio Packet Loss in the Internet. In: ACM NOSSDAV, Durham, NH (April 1995)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Boutremans, C., Iannaccone, G., Diot, C.: Impact of Link Failures on VoIP Performance. In: ACM NOSSDAV, Miami, FL (May 2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cole, R., Rosenbluth, J.: Voice over IP Performance Monitoring. In: ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 31, pp. 9–24 (April 2001)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Markopoulou, A., Tobagi, F., Karam, M.: Assessment of VoIP Quality over Internet Backbones. In: IEEE Infocom, New York, NY (June 2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rix, A., Beerends, J., Kim, D., Kroon, P., Ghitza, O.: Objective Assessment of Speech and Audio Quality — Technology and Applications. In: IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, vol. 14, pp. 1890–1901 (November 2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rosenberg, J., Schulzrinne, H.: Models for Multi Party Conferencing in SIP. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), draft-ietf-sipping-conferencing-models.txt (January 2003)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tao, S., Xu, K., Estepa, A., Fei, T., Gao, L., Guerin, R., Kurose, J., Towsley, D., Zhang, Z.: Improving VoIP Quality Through Path Switching. In: IEEE Infocom, Miami, FL (March 2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Krishna Ramachandran
    • 1
  • Sunitha Beeram
    • 1
  1. 1.Citrix OnlineSanta BarbaraUSA

Personalised recommendations