Skip to main content

Using Multiple Query Aspects to Build Test Collections without Human Relevance Judgments

  • Conference paper
Advances in Information Retrieval (ECIR 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 5478))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Collecting relevance judgments (qrels) is an especially challenging part of building an information retrieval test collection. This paper presents a novel method for creating test collections by offering a substitute for relevance judgments. Our method is based on an old idea in IR: a single information need can be represented by many query articulations. We call different articulations of a particular need query aspects. By combining the top k documents retrieved by a single system for multiple query aspects, we build judgment-free qrels whose rank ordering of IR systems correlates highly with rankings based on human relevance judgments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Carterette, B., Allan, J.: Incremental test collections. In: CIKM 2005: Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 680–687. ACM, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carterette, B., Allan, J., Sitaraman, R.: Minimal test collections for retrieval evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Seattle, WA, pp. 268–275. ACM Press, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sanderson, M., Joho, H.: Forming test collections with no system pooling. In: SIGIR 2004: Proceedings of the 27th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 33–40. ACM, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buckley, C., Voorhees, E.M.: Retrieval evaluation with incomplete information. In: SIGIR 2004: Proceedings of the 27th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 25–32. ACM Press, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sakai, T.: Alternatives to bpref. In: SIGIR 2007: Proceedings of the 30th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 71–78. ACM, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Soboroff, I., Nicholas, C., Cahan, P.: Ranking retrieval systems without relevance judgments. In: Proceedings of the 24th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, pp. 66–73. ACM, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wu, S., Crestani, F.: Methods for ranking information retrieval systems without relevance judgments. In: SAC 2003: Proceedings of the 2003 ACM symposium on Applied computing, pp. 811–816. ACM, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Spoerri, A.: Using the structure of overlap between search results to rank retrieval systems without relevance judgments. Information Processing and Management 43(4), 1059–1070 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee, J.H.: Analyses of multiple evidence combination. SIGIR Forum 31(SI), 267–276 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Larsen, B., Ingwersen, P., Kekäläinen, J.: The polyrepresentation continuum in IR. In: IIiX: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Information Interaction in Context, pp. 88–96. ACM Press, New York (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Ingwersen, P., Järvelin, K.: The Turn: Integration of Information Seeking and Retrieval in Context. The Information Retrieval Series. Springer, New York (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Skov, M., Larsen, B., Ingwersen, P.: Inter and intra-document contexts applied in polyrepresentation for best match IR. Information Processing and Management 44(5), 1673–1683 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Belkin, N.J., Cool, C., Croft, W.B., Callan, J.P.: The effect multiple query representations on information retrieval system performance. In: SIGIR 1993: Proceedings of the 16th annual international ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 339–346. ACM, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Belkin, N.J., Kantor, P.B., Fox, E.A., Shaw, E.A.: Combining the evidence of multiple query representations for information retrieval. Information Processing and Management 31(3), 431–448 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kelly, D., Fu, X.: Eliciting better information need descriptions from users of information search systems. Information Processing and Management 43(1), 30–46 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cormack, G.V., Palmer, C.R., Clarke, C.L.A.: Efficient construction of large test collections. In: SIGIR 1998: Proceedings of the 21st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 282–289. ACM, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Robertson, S.E., Walker, S., Jones, S., Beaulieu, M.H., Gatford, M.: Okapi at TREC-3. In: Proceedings of TREC-3, the 3rd Text REtrieval Conference, NIST, pp. 109–127 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Harmon, D.K.: Overview of the Third Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-3). DIANE Publishing Company (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Harmon, D.K., Voorhees, E.M.: Overview of the Seventh Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-7). DIANE Publishing Company (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Harmon, D.K., Voorhees, E.M.: Overview of the Eighth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-8). DIANE Publishing Company (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kendall, M.: Rank Correlation Methods, 3rd edn. Griffin (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Voorhees, E.M.: Evaluation by highly relevant documents. In: SIGIR 2001: Proceedings of the 24th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 74–82. ACM, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Efron, M. (2009). Using Multiple Query Aspects to Build Test Collections without Human Relevance Judgments. In: Boughanem, M., Berrut, C., Mothe, J., Soule-Dupuy, C. (eds) Advances in Information Retrieval. ECIR 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5478. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00958-7_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00958-7_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-00957-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-00958-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics