Abstract
Various important aspects should be taken into account in the combination of different space geodetic techniques. Consistency of models and standards, quality checks of solutions from individual Analysis Centers (AC), proper scaling of these solutions within the combination process, usage of rigorous combination methods and quality checks of the final combined solution are some of those. In this study, variance component estimation (VCE) is implemented to obtain optimal scaling (weighting) factors for the VLBI (Very Long Baseline Interferometry) intra-technique combination on the basis of normal equations. Afterwards, we apply a Tikhonov-type regularization method to stabilize a combined solution by imposing additional constraints about the solution. The regularization parameters are calculated with two different methods, variance component estimation and generalized cross-validation. The results show that the use of regularization significantly reduces the effect of instability in combined normal equation systems and provides more reasonable results.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Angermann D., et al. (2004). ITRS Combination Center at DGFI: A terrestrial Reference Frame Realization 2003, Deutsche Geodaetische Kommission, Angewandte Geodaesie, Reihe B, Heft Nr. 313.
Arsenin V.Ya and Krianev A.V. (1992). Generalized maximum likelihood method and its application for solving ill-posed problems. Proceedings of the int. conference held in Moscow, 1991, pp 3-12 (1992).
Baarda W. (1995). Linking up spatial models in geodesy extended S-transformations, Netherlands Geodetic Commission, Publications on Geodesy, 41.
Caspary W.F. (2000). Concepts of network and deformation analysis, Monograph 11, School of Geometic Engineering, The University of New South Wales, Australia.
Crocetto N., Gatti M, and Russo P. (2000). Simplified formulae for the BIQUE estimation of variance components in disjunctive observation groups. Journal of Geodesy, 74, pp. 447-457.
Davies P. and Blewitt G. (2000). Methodology for global geodetic time series estimation: A new tool for geodynamics, Journal of Geophysical Research, 105(B5), 11,083–11,100.
Drewes H. and Angermann D. (2002). Remarks on some problems in the combination of station coordinate and velocity solutions, IERS Technical Note No. 30, 30-32.
Even-Tzur G. (2006). Datum definition and its influence on the reliability of geodetic networks, Zeitschrift für Geodäsie, Geoinformation und Landmanagement (zfv), 2, 87-95.
Foestner W. (1979). Ein Verfahren zur Schatzung von Varianz-Kovarianz Komponenten. Allgemeine Vermessungs-Nachrichten 86:446-453.
Golub G.H., Heart M., Wahba G. (1979). Generalized cross-validation as a method for choosing a good ridge parameter. Technometrics 21:215-223.
Grafarend E.W., Kleusberg A., and Schaffrin B. (1980). An Introduction to the variance-covariance-component estimation of Helmert Type. Zitschrift für Vermessungswese, 105, 161-180.
Grafarend E. W., Schaffrin B. (1974). Unbiased free net adjustment, Surv Rev 171:200-218.
Hansen P.C. (2000). Analysis of discrete ill-posed problemy by means of the L-curve. SIAM Rev 34: 561-580.
Helmert F.R. (1924). Die Ausgleichungsrechnung nach der Methode der kleinsten Quadrate, 3, Auflage, Teubner, Leipzig.
Koch K.R. and Kusche J. (2002). Regularization of the geopotential determination from satellite data by variance components, Journal of Geodesy, 76, 259-268.
Koch K.R. and Papo H.B. (2003). The Bayesian Approach in Two-Step Modelling of Deformations, AVN, 8, 365-370.
Kusche J. (2003a). A Monte-Carlo technique for weight estimation in satellite geodesy, Journal of Geodesy, 76, 641-652.
Kusche J. (2003b). Noise variance estimation and optimal weight determination for GOCE gravity recovery, Advances in Geosciences, 1, pp.81-85.
Ma C. and Petrov L. (2002). SINEX File implementation in the VLBI Calc/Solve Analysis System, IERS Technical Note No. 30, 204-206.
Molenaar M. (1981). A further inquiry into the theory of S-transformations and criterion matrices, Netherlands Geodetic Commission, Publications on Geodesy, 7.
Rao C.R. (1973). Linear statistical inference and its applicatios. Wiley, New York.
Schaffrin B. (1983). Varianz-Kovarianz-Komponenten-Schaetzung bei der Ausgleichung Heterogener Wiederholungsmessungen, Series C, 282, German Geodetic Commission, Munich.
Sillard P. and Boucher C. (2001). A review of algebraic constraints in terrestrial reference frame datum definition, Journal of Geodesy, 75, 63-73.
Tikhonov A. N. (1963). Solution of incorrectly formulated problems and the regularization method, Soviet Math. Dokl., 4 (1963), pp. 1035-1038; (English)Akad. Nauk. SSSR, 151 (1963), pp.501-504.
Tikhonov A.N. and Arsenin V.Ya. (1977). Solutions of Ill-posed problems, Wiley, New York.
Xu P (1997). A general solution in geodetic non-linear rank defect models, Bull Geod Sci Aff 1:1-25.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tanir, E., Heinkelmann, R., Schuh, H., Kusche, J., van Loon, J. (2009). Assessment of the Results of VLBI Intra-Technique Combination Using Regularization Methods. In: Drewes, H. (eds) Geodetic Reference Frames. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 134. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00860-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00860-3_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-00859-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-00860-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)