Advertisement

A Generalized Topic Modeling Approach for Maven Search

  • Ali Daud
  • Juanzi Li
  • Lizhu Zhou
  • Faqir Muhammad
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5446)

Abstract

This paper addresses the problem of semantics-based maven search in research community, which means identifying a person with some given expertise. Traditional approaches either ignored semantic knowledge or temporal information, resulting in some right mavens that cannot be effectively identified because of non-occurrence of keywords and un-exploitation of time effects. In this paper, we propose a novel semantics and temporal information based maven search (STMS) approach to discover latent topics (semantically related soft clusters of words) between the authors, venues (conferences or journals) and time simultaneously. In the proposed approach, each author in a venue is represented as a probability distribution over topics, and each topic is represented as a probability distribution over words and year of the venue for that topic. Through discovered latent topics we can search mavens by implicitly modeling word-author, author-author and author-venue correlations with continuous time effects. Inference making procedure for topics and authors of new venues is explained. We also show how authors’ correlations can be discovered and the bad effect of topics sparseness on the retrieval performance. Experimental results on the corpus downloaded from DBLP show that proposed approach significantly outperformed the baseline approach, due to its ability to produce less sparse topics.

Keywords

Maven Search Research Community Topic Modeling Unsupervised Learning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Andrieu, C., Freitas, N.D., Doucet, A., Jordan, M.: An Introduction to MCMC for Machine Learning. Journal of Machine Learning 50, 5–43 (2003)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Azzopardi, L., Girolami, M., Risjbergen, K.V.: Investigating the Relationship between Language Model Perplexity and IR Precision-Recall Measures. In: Proc. of the 26th ACM SIGIR, Toronto, Canada, July 28-August 1 (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Balog, K., Azzopardi, L., de Rijke, M.: Formal Models for Expert Finding in Enterprise Corpora. In: Proc. of SIGIR, pp. 43–55 (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Balog, K., Bogers, T., Azzopardi, L., Rijke, M., Bosch, A.: Broad Expertise Retrieval in Sparse Data Environments. In: Proc. of SIGIR, pp. 551–558 (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.I.: Latent Dirichlet Allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research 3, 993–1022 (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cao, Y., Liu, J., Bao, S., Li, H.: Research on Expert Search at Enterprise Track of TREC (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    DBLP Bibliography Database, http://www.informatik.uni-trier.de/~ley/db/
  8. 8.
    Deerwester, S., Dumais, S.T., Furnas, G.W., Landauer, T.K., Harshman, R.: Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 41(6), 391–407 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Griffiths, T.L., Steyvers, M.: Finding Scientific Topics. In: Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, pp. 5228–5235 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hawking, D.: Challenges in Enterprise Search. In: Proc. of the 15th Conference on Australasian Database, vol. 27, pp. 15–24 (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hofmann, T.: Probabilistic Latent Semantic Analysis. In: Proc. of the 15th Annual Conference on UAI, Stockholm, Sweden, July 30-August 1 (1999)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hofmann, T., Puzicha, J., Jordan, M.I.: Learning from Dyadic Data. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), vol. 11. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mimno, D., McCallum, A.: Expertise Modeling for Matching Papers with Reviewers. In: Proc. of the 13th ACM SIGKDD, pp. 500–509 (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nie, Z., Ma, Y., Shi, S., Wen, J., Ma, W.: Web Object Retrieval. In: Proc. of World Wide Web (WWW), pp. 81–90 (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Petkova, D., Croft, W.B.: Generalizing the Language Modeling Framework for Named Entity Retrieval. In: Proc. of SIGIR (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rosen-Zvi, M., Griffiths, T., Steyvers, M., Smyth, P.: The Author-Topic Model for Authors and Documents. In: Proc. of the 20th International Conference on UAI, Canada (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tang, J., Zhang, J., Yao, L., Li, J., Zhang, L., Su, Z.: ArnetMiner: Extraction and Mining of Academic Social Networks. In: Proc. of the 14th ACM SIGKDD (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Teh, Y.W., Jordan, M.I., Beal, M.J., Blei, D.M.: Hierarchical Dirichlet Processes. Technical Report 653, Department of Statistics, UC Berkeley (2004)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhai, C., Lafferty, J.: A Study of Smoothing Methods for Language Models Applied to Ad-hoc Information Retrieval. In: Proc. of the 24th ACM SIGIR, pp. 334–342 (2001)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang, J., Tang, J., Liu, L., Li, J.: A Mixture Model for Expert Finding. In: Washio, T., Suzuki, E., Ting, K.M., Inokuchi, A. (eds.) PAKDD 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5012, pp. 466–478. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhang, J., Tang, J., Li, J.: Expert Finding in a Social Network. In: Kotagiri, R., Radha Krishna, P., Mohania, M., Nantajeewarawat, E. (eds.) DASFAA 2007. LNCS, vol. 4443, pp. 1066–1069. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ali Daud
    • 1
  • Juanzi Li
    • 1
  • Lizhu Zhou
    • 1
  • Faqir Muhammad
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science & TechnologyTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics & StatisticsAllama Iqbal Open UniversityIslamabadPakistan

Personalised recommendations