Skip to main content

Quick but not so Dirty ML Estimation of Spatial Autoregressive Models

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Tool Kits in Regional Science

Part of the book series: Advances in Spatial Science ((ADVSPATIAL))

  • 800 Accesses

Abstract

Positive spatial autocorrelation is a tendency for similar values of a single variable Y to be present in nearby locations on a map; it is displayed when observations contained in data sets are locationally tagged to the earth’s surface (i.e., georeferenced data sets). The prevailing nature and degree of spatial autocorrelation may be denoted by ρ, while the self-covariation of n geographically neighboring values within a variable may be represented with the n × n matrix V−1ρ2, which is a function of ρ. This geographic dependency feature of georeferenced data is captured by the auto-Gaussian log-likelihood function:

$${\rm constant - }(n/2)\ln (\sigma ^2 ) + \ln [\det (V)] - (Y - X\beta )^T V(Y - X\beta )/(2\sigma ^2 )$$
(9.1)

where det(V), superscript T, and ln, respectively, denote the matrix determinant and transpose operations and the natural logarithm, Y is an nx1 vector of georeferenced values, X is an n x (p+1) matrix of p corresponding predictor variables coupled with a vector of ones, and vector β?and scalar ρ, respectively, denote the standard nonconstant mean and constant variance. The parameters of (9.1) most often are estimated using maximum likelihood (ML) techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barry, R., & Pace, R. (1999). Monte Carlo estimates of the log determinant of large sparse matrices. Linear Algebra and Its Applications, 289, 41–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cressie, N. (1991). Statistics for spatial data. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, D. (1988). Advanced spatial statistics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, D. (1990). A numerical simplification for estimating parameters of spatial autoregressive models. In D Griffith (Ed.), Spatial statistics: Past, present, and future (pp. 185–195). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute of Mathematical Geography.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, D. (1992). Simplifying the normalizing factor in spatial autoregressions for irregular lattices. Papers in Regional Science, 71, 71–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, D. (1993). Advanced spatial statistics for analyzing and visualizing geo-referenced data. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 7, 107–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, D. (1996). Spatial statistical analysis and GIS: exploring computational simplifications for estimating the neighborhood spatial forecasting model. In P. Longley & M. Batty (Eds.), Spatial analysis: Modelling in a GIS environment (pp. 255–268). London: Longman GeoInformation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, D. (1999). Statistical and mathematical sources of regional science theory: map pattern analysis as an example, Papers in Regional Science, 78, 21–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, D. (2000). Eigenfunction properties and approximations of selected incidence matrices employed in spatial analyses. Linear Algebra and Its Applications, 321, 95–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, D. (2004a). ‘Extreme eigenfunctions of adjacency matrices for planar graphs employed in spatial analyses. Linear Algebra and Its Applications, 388, 201–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, D. (2004b). Faster maximum likelihood estimation of very large spatial autoregressive models: an extension of the Smirnov-Anselin result. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 74, 855–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, D., & Layne, L. (1997). Uncovering relationships between geo-statistical and spatial autoregressive models. In the (1996) Proceedings on the Section on Statistics and the Environment, American Statistical Association, pp. 91–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, D., & Sone, A. (1995). Trade-offs associated with normalizing constant computational simplifications for estimating spatial statistical models. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 51, 165–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, D., & Watts, D. (1985). A quadratic design criterion for precise estimation in nonlinear regression models,' Technometrics, 27, 241–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiernan, V. (1998). Most social scientists shun free use of supercomputers.' Chronicle of Higher Education, 45 (September 11): A25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. (1993). Approximations to the determinant term in Gaussian maximum likelihood estimation of some spatial models.' Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods, 22, 189–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ord, J. (1975). Estimating methods for models of spatial interaction. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 120–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pace, R., & LeSage, J. (2002). Semiparametric maximum likelihood estimates of spatial dependence. Geographical Analysis, 34, 76–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ripley, B. (1990). Gibbsian interaction models. In D Griffith (Ed.) Spatial statistics: Past, present, and future (pp. 3–25). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute of Mathematical Geography.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smirnov, O., & Anselin, L. (2001). Fast maximum likelihood estimation of very large spatial autoregressive models: a characteristic polynomial approach. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 35, 301–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upton, G., & Fingleton, B. (1985). Spatial Data Analysis by Example (vol. 1). NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittle, P. (1954). On stationary processes in the plane, Biometrika, 41, 434–449.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel A. Griffith .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Griffith, D.A. (2009). Quick but not so Dirty ML Estimation of Spatial Autoregressive Models. In: Sonis, M., Hewings, G. (eds) Tool Kits in Regional Science. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00627-2_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00627-2_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-00626-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-00627-2

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics