Laughter around the End of Storytelling in Multi-party Interaction

  • Mika Enomoto
  • Masashi Okamoto
  • Masato Ohba
  • Hitoshi Iida
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5447)

Abstract

This research argues that the sequence organization around the end of a storytelling is affected by which of the hearers inserts a laughter to which position in the sequence. Laughters before the beginning point of possible completion of storytelling never affect on the sequence organization, while those which occur within a transition space change who is to speak first after the storytelling. Though an oriented recipient (OR) is a default candidate who can speak first after the storytelling, laughs within a transition space let the OR pass his/her own occasion for speech to another participant.

Keywords

storytelling laughter sequence organization oriented recipient non-oriented recipient 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Den, Y., Enomoto, M.: A scientific approach to conversational informatics: Description, analysis, and modeling of human conversation. In: Nishida, T. (ed.) Conversational informatics: An engineering approach, pp. 307–330. Wiley and Sons Inc., Chichester (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Enomoto, M., Den, Y.: How can hearers take a turn after a long interval. In: Proceedings of the 20th Conference on the Japanese Association of Sociolinguistic Science, pp. 58–61 (2007) (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Glenn, P.: Conversation analysis and the study of laughter. In: Laughter in Interaction, pp. 35–52. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goffman, E.: Forms of Talk. University of Pennsylvania Press (1981)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jefferson, G.: Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. In: Schenkein, J. (ed.) Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, pp. 219–248. Academic Press, New York (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jefferson, G.: Notes on some orderlinesses of overlap onset. In: D’Urso, V., Leojardi, P. (eds.) Discorse analysis and natural rhetorics, pp. 11–38. CLEUP (1984)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kipp, M.: Gesture Generation by Imitation: From Human Behavior to Computer Character Animation. Dissertation.com, Boca Raton, FL (2004), http://www.dfki.de/kipp/anvil/
  8. 8.
    Sacks, H.: Analysis of the course of a joke’s telling in conversation. In: Bauman, R., Scherzer, J. (eds.) Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking, pp. 337–353. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1974)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., Jefferson, G.: A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50, 696–735 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mika Enomoto
    • 1
  • Masashi Okamoto
    • 1
  • Masato Ohba
    • 1
  • Hitoshi Iida
    • 1
  1. 1.Tokyo University of TechnologyTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations