Advertisement

Japanese Reported Speech: Against a Direct–Indirect Distinction

  • Emar Maier
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5447)

Abstract

English direct discourse is easily recognized by, for example, the lack of a complementizer, the quotation marks (or the intonational contour those induce), and verbatim (‘shifted’) pronouns. Japanese employs the same complementizer for all reports, does not have a consistent intonational quotation marking, and tends to drop pronouns where possible. Some have argued that this shows no more than that many Japanese reports are ambiguous. These authors claim that, despite the lack of explicit marking, the underlying distinction is just as hard in Japanese as it is in English. On the basis of a number of ‘mixed’ examples, I claim that the line between direct and indirect is blurred and I propose a unified analysis of speech reporting in which a general mechanism of mixed quotation replaces the classical two-fold distinction.

Keywords

Person Pronoun Quotation Mark Direct Discourse Direct Report Direct Speech 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abbott, B.: Some notes on quotation. In: de Brabanter, P. (ed.) Hybrid Quotations. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, vol. 17, pp. 13–26. John Benjamins, Amsterdam (2005)Google Scholar
  2. Anand, P., Nevins, A.: Shifty operators in changing contexts. In: Young, R. (ed.) Proceedings of SALT XIV. Cornell, NY (2004)Google Scholar
  3. Anand, P.: Re-expressing judgment. Theoretical Linguistics 33, 199–208 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cappelen, H., Lepore, E.: The varieties of quotation. Mind 106, 429–450 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coulmas, F.: Direct and indirect speech: general problems and problems of Japanese. Journal of Pragmatic 9, 41–63 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Geurts, B., Maier, E.: Quotation in context. In: de Brabanter, P. (ed.) Hybrid Quotations. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, vol. 17, pp. 109–128. John Benjamins, Amsterdam (2005)Google Scholar
  7. Hirose, Y.: Direct and indirect speech as quotations of public and private expression. Lingua 95, 223–238 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kaplan, D.: Demonstratives. In: Almog, J., Perry, J., Wettstein, H. (eds.) Themes from Kaplan, New York, pp. 481–614. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1989)Google Scholar
  9. Kratzer, A.: Beyond ouch and oops: How descriptive and expressive meaning interact. In: Cornell Conference on Theories of Context Dependence (1999)Google Scholar
  10. Kuno, S.: Blended quasi-direct discourse in Japanese. In: Poser, W. (ed.) Papers from the Second International Workshop on Japanese Syntax, Stanford, CSLI, pp. 75–102 (1988)Google Scholar
  11. Maier, E.: Mixed quotation: between use and mention. In: Proceedings of LENLS 2007, Miyazaki, Japan (2007)Google Scholar
  12. Maier, E.: Quotation marks as monsters, or the other way around? In: Aloni, M., Dekker, P., Roelofsen, F. (eds.) Proceedings of the Sixteenth Amsterdam Colloquium, Amsterdam. ILLC, pp. 145–150 (2007)Google Scholar
  13. Oshima, D.: Perspectives in Reported Discourse. PhD thesis, Stanford (2006)Google Scholar
  14. Potts, C., Kawahara, S.: Japanese honorifics as emotive definite descriptions. In: Watanabe, K., Young, R.B. (eds.) Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory, pp. 235–254. CLC Publications, Ithaca (2004)Google Scholar
  15. Potts, C.: Lexicalized intonational meaning. In: Kawahara, S. (ed.) University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 30. GLSA, Amherst (2005)Google Scholar
  16. Potts, C.: The dimensions of quotation. In: Barker, C., Jacobson, P. (eds.) Direct Compositionality, pp. 405–431. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007)Google Scholar
  17. Schlenker, P.: A plea for monsters. Linguistics and Philosophy 26, 29–120 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. von Stechow, A.: Binding by verbs: Tense, person and mood under attitudes. In: Kadowaki, M., Kawahara, S. (eds.) Proceedings of NELS 33, pp. 379–403. GLSA, Amherst (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emar Maier
    • 1
  1. 1.ILLC/University of AmsterdamNetherlands

Personalised recommendations