Skip to main content

Institutions for environmental service payment programmes - evidence of community resource management arrangements in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Tropical Rainforests and Agroforests under Global Change

Part of the book series: Environmental Science and Engineering ((ENVSCIENCE))

  • 1741 Accesses

Summary

Payments for Environmental Service (PES) schemes are increasingly discussed as a possibility to promote the conservation of natural resources. However, these pilot schemes are frequently small in size and face high transaction costs, leading to the exclusion of smallholders. Solutions could be to use collectively bundled contracts or existing community resource management arrangement structures. Using the example of the institution of the community conservation agreements (CCA) in Central Sulawesi we assess whether a community arrangement can provide the framework conditions to implement a PES project. Four points are necessary: an organisational structure representing the village households; participation of the resource users in the institutional implementation; monitoring and enforcement by the institution of the forest usage regulations; and, finally, the institutions’ ability to administer funds. Our findings show that the CCAs are backed up by an organisational structure, the village conservation council. However, in most villages the community members were not involved and did not know of the agreement negotiation. A monitoring entity has been constituted. The awareness for nature conservation has increased only in the recent past, but resource extraction has left its marks, and the participants perceived environmental problems to be growing. Finally, compensation payments are regarded on the one hand as a good reimbursement for desisting from using the forest resources. On the other hand, due to the negative experiences with corruption, a clear organisational structure for the administration of such a project is necessary, which does not seem to be given with the current institutional arrangements. Therefore, we recommend using existing community arrangements because established structures can be used. However, these need to be enriched to fulfil the requirements of a PES project. It is of major importance to involve the community members in the management of natural resource projects to increase compliance with regulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Antle JM, Stoorvogel JJ (2008) Agricultural carbon sequestration, poverty, and sustainability. Environment and Development Economics 13 (03): 327–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkard G (2002) Natural Resource Management in Central Sulawesi: Past Experience and Fitire Prospects. Discussion Paper Series 8. Göttingen: STORMA. http://ufgb989.uni-forst.gwdg.de/DPS/index.htm

  • Cacho OJ, Marshall GR, Milne M (2003) Smallholder Agroforestry Projects: Potential for Carbon Sequestration and Poverty Alleviation. ESA Working Paper 03–06. Agriculture and Economic Development Analysis Division, FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Jong TR, Tipper R, Montoya-Gomez G (2000) An economic analysis of the potential for carbon sequestration by forests: evidence from southern Mexico. Ecological Economics 33 (2): 313–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grieg-Gran M, Porras I, Wunder S (2005) How can market mechanisms for forest environmental services help the poor? Preliminary lessons from Latin America. World Development 33 (9): 1511–1527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanna S (1995) Efficiencies of user participation in natural resource management. In Property Rights and the Environment: Social and Ecological Issues, edited by S. Hanna and M. Munasinghe. Washington D.C.: Beijer International Institute of Ecological Economics and the World Bank

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jindal R, Swallow B, Kerr J (2008) Forestry-based carbon sequestration projects in Africa: Potential benefits and challenges. Natural Resources Forum 32 (2): 116–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger RA (1994) Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. 2nd Edition ed. London, New Delhi: Thousand Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maertens M, Zeller M, Birner R (2006) Sustainable agricultural intensification in forest frontier areas. Agricultural Economics 34 (2): 197–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mappatoba M, Birner R (2004) Co-Management of Protected Areas - The Case of Community Agreements on Conservation in the Lore Lindu National Park, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. Eschborn: Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matta J, Kerr J (2006) Can Environmental Services Payments Sustain Collaborative Forest Management? Journal of Sustainable Forestry 23 (2): 63–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayring P (2007) Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken. 9. Aufl., Dr. nach Typoskript ed, UTB für Wissenschaft ; 8229 P¨adagogik. Weinheim u.a.: Beltz

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelowa A, Jotzo F (2005) Transaction costs, institutional rigidities and the size of the clean development mechanism. Energy Policy 33 (4): 511–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagiola S, Bishop J, Landell-Mills NE (2002) Selling forest environmental services market-based mechanisms for conservation and development. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer C (2007) Background paper: Community forest use and conservation agreements in Lore Lindu, Indonesia. Zürich: ETH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfaff A, Kerr S, Lipper L, Cavatassi R, Davis B, Hendy J, Sanchez-Azofeifa GA (2007) Will buying tropical forest carbon benefit the poor? Evidence from Costa Rica. Land Use Policy 24 (3): 600–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reetz S (2008) Data from A4 village survey 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeberg-Elverfeldt C, Schwarze S, Zeller M (2008) Payments for Environmental Services - Incentives through Carbon Sequestration Compensation for Cocoa-based Agroforestry Systems in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. University of Hohenheim. http://www.uni-hohenheim.de/i490a/dps/2008/dp022008.pdf

  • Smith J, and Scherr SJ (2003) Capturing the Value of Forest Carbon for Local Livelihoods. World Development 31 (12): 21432160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith RJ, Muir RDJ, Walpole MJ, Balmford A, Leader-Williams N (2003) Governance and the loss of biodiversity. Nature 426 (6962): 67–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steyaert S, Lisoir H (2005) Participatory Methods Toolkit. A practitioner’s manual; Method: Focus Group. King Baudouin Foundation and the Flemish Institute for Science and Technology Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Transparency International 2007. TI Corruption Perceptions Index

    Google Scholar 

  • van Asselt Marjolein BA, Rijkens-Klomp N (2002) A look on the mirror: reflection on participation in Integrated Assessment from a methodological perspective. Global Environmental Change 12: 167–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Edig X (2005) Measurement of Absolute Poverty and Indicators of Poverty Among Rural Households in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. Diplomarbeit, Department of Geography, University of Göttingen, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunder S (2008) Payments for environmental services and the poor: concepts and preliminary evidence. Environment and Development Economics 13 (3): 279–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young OR, Agrawal A, King LA, Sand PH, Underdal A, Wasson M (1999) Institutional Dimensions of Global Environmental Change - Science Plan. IHDP Report No. 9. Bonn, Germany: International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christina Seeberg-Elverfeldt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Seeberg-Elverfeldt, C., Schwarze, S., Faust, H. (2010). Institutions for environmental service payment programmes - evidence of community resource management arrangements in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. In: Tscharntke, T., Leuschner, C., Veldkamp, E., Faust, H., Guhardja, E., Bidin, A. (eds) Tropical Rainforests and Agroforests under Global Change. Environmental Science and Engineering(). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00493-3_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics