Modelling Trust into an Agent-Based Simulation Tool to Support the Formation and Configuration of Work Teams

  • Juan Martínez-Miranda
  • Juan Pavón
Part of the Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing book series (AINSC, volume 55)


One important factor that contributes to create good or bad relationships between individuals inside human societies is the notion of trust. In particular, some research works have proved the influence of trust in the performance of the activities that team-members perform jointly. This paper presents our initial theoretical work to include the trust factor into our TEAKS (TEAm Knowledge-based Structuring) model. TEAKS is an agent-based model to simulate the interaction between individuals when working together in the development of a project. Each team-member is represented through a set of pre-selected human characteristics: the emotional state, social characteristics, cognitive abilities, and personality types. The main outcome of the TEAKS simulation is statistical information about the possible performance at the individual and team levels. In this context we use two (emotional state and personality traits) of the four modelled human characteristics to introduce a model of trust into TEAKS to analyse the impact of trust in the results of the team.


Agent-Based Simulations Trust Human Performance Modelling 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Burchell, B., Wilkinson, F.: Trust, Business Relationships, and the Contractual Environment. Cambridge Journal of Economics 21, 217–237 (1997)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Buskens, V.: The Social Structure of Trust. Social Networks (20), 265–298 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Code, S., Langdan-Fox, J.: Motivation, cognitions and traits: predicting occupational health, well-being and performance. Stress and Health J. 17(3), 159–174 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Castelfranchi, C., Falcone, R.: Principles of Trust for MAS: Cognitive Anatomy, Social Importance, and Quantification. In: Proc. of ICMAS 1998, pp. 72–79 (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Costa, A.C.: Work team trust and effectiveness. Personnel Review 32(5), 605–622 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Das, T.K., Teng, B.G.: Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review 23, 491–512 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    di Luzio, G.: A Sociological Concept of Client Trust. Current Sociology 54(4), 549–564 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dirks, K.T.: The Effects of Interpersonal Trust on Work Group Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology (84), 445–455 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dunn, J.R., Schweitzer, M.E.: Feeling and believing: The influence of emotion on trust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88(5), 736–748 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Elangovan, A.R., Shapiro, D.L.: Betrayal of trust in organizations. Academy of Management Review 23, 547–566 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fisher, C.D.: Mood and emotions while working: missing pieces of job satisfaction? Journal of Organisational Behaviour 21(2), 185–202 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gurtman, M.B.: Trust, distrust, and interpersonal problems: A circumplex analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 62(6), 989–1002 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Heller, D., Judge, T.A., Watson, D.: The confounding role of personality and trait affectivity in the relationship between job and life satisfaction. Journal of Organisational Behaviour 23(7), 815–835 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Littauer, F.: Personality Plus: How to Understand Others by Understanding Yourself, Grand Rapids. Fleming H. Revell Publishing, Michigan (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lumsden, J., Mackay, L.: How does personality affect trust in B2C e-commerce? In: Proc. of the 8th Int. Conf. on Electronic Commerce (ICEC 2006), pp. 471–481 (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mamdani, E.H., Assilian, S.: An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller. International Journal Machine Stud. 7(1) (1975)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Marsh, S.: Formalising Trust as a Computational Concept. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Stirling (1994)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Martínez-Miranda, J., Pavón, J.: An Agent-Based Simulation Tool to Support Work Teams Formation. Advances in Soft Computing 50(2009), 80–89 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Merrill, D.W., Reid, R.H.: Personal Styles & Effective Performance. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1981)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pillutla, M.M., Malhotra, D., Murnighan, J.K.: Attributions of trust and the calculus of reciprocity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 39(5), 448–455 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sabater, J., Sierra, C.: REGRET: A reputation model for gregarious societies. In: Proc. of the 4th Workshop on Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies, pp. 61–69 (2001)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sabater, J., Sierra, C.: Review on Computational Trust and Reputation Models. Artificial Intelligence Review 24(1), 33–60 (2005)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vangen, S., Huxham, C.: Nurturing Collaborative Relations: Building Trust in Interorganizational Collaboration. J. of App. Behavioral Science 39(1), 5–31 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yu, B., Singh, M.P.: Distributed Reputation Management for Electronic Commerce. Computational Intelligence 18(4), 535–549 (2002)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juan Martínez-Miranda
    • 1
  • Juan Pavón
    • 1
  1. 1.Dep. Ingeniería del Software e Inteligencia ArtificialUniversidad Complutense de MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations