Advertisement

Management of Knowledge-Intensive Healthcare Processes on the Example of General Medical Documentation

  • Danny Ammon
  • Dirk Hoffmann
  • Tobias Jakob
  • Ekkehard Finkeissen
  • Vesko Detschew
  • Thomas Wetter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 17)

Abstract

Healthcare Processes are characterized by knowledge-intensive tasks. In contrast to this, most of the efforts for business process management in healthcare do not refer to this quality, and software engineering in healthcare relies on an unspecific process-oriented approach. In this contribution, we present a method of capturing and analysis of a knowledge-intensive process, from which we derive requirements to a knowledge- as well as process-oriented information system for the example of general medical documentation. We present the resulting implementation of a knowledge-based electronic patient record and discuss the potentials and open issues for our proposal.

Keywords

Process modeling in healthcare process-oriented system architectures in healthcare integrating healthcare processes with electronic medical records 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abidi, S.S.R.: Healthcare knowledge management: The art of the possible. In: Riaño, D. (ed.) K4CARE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4924, pp. 1–20. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ammon, D., et al.: Developing an Architecture of a Knowledge-Based Electronic Patient Record. In: Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 653–660. ACM, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beale, T., Heard, S.: An Ontology-based Model of Clinical Information. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 129, 785–790 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Doroszewski, J.: Unity and Diversity of the Medical Action: A Review of its Components and Their Interconnections. Metamed. 2, 155–168 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Finkeissen, E., et al.: Medrapid: Medical Community & Business Intelligence System. In: Health Data in the Information Society: Proceedings of MIE 2002. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gode, A.: Just Words. J. Amer. Med. Ass. 205, 352 (1968)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gronau, N., Müller, C., Korf, R.: KMDL: Capturing, Analysing and Improving Knowledge-Intensive Business Processes. J. Univ. Comp. Sci. 4, 452–472 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gronau, N., Weber, E.: Management of Knowledge Intensive Business Processes. In: Desel, J., Pernici, B., Weske, M. (eds.) BPM 2004. LNCS, vol. 3080, pp. 163–178. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hädrich, T.: Contrary Positions About Modeling Knowledge Work. In: Althoff, K.-D., Dengel, A.R., Bergmann, R., Nick, M., Roth-Berghofer, T.R. (eds.) WM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3782, pp. 248–258. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hornbrook, M., Hurtado, A., Johnson, R.: Health Care Episodes: Definition, Measurement and Use. Med. Care Rev. 42, 163–217 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hucklenbroich, P.: Klinisch-methodologische Aspekte medizinischer Expertensysteme. In: Hucklenbroich, P., Toellner, R. (eds.) Künstliche Intelligenz in der Medizin, pp. 9–36. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart (1993)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hucklenbroich, P.: Wissenschaftstheorie als Theorie der Medizin: Themen und Probleme. In: Deppert, W., et al. (eds.) Wissenschaftstheorien in der Medizin: Ein Symposium, pp. 65–96. de Gruyter, Berlin (1992)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H.: The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    Polanyi, M.: Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1958)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schreiber, G., et al.: Knowledge Engineering and Management: The CommonKADS Methodology. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine, http://www.snomed.org/
  18. 18.
    Tange, H.J., Dietz, J.L.G., Hasman, A., de Vries Robbé, P.F.: A Generic Model of Clinical Practice: A Common View of Individual and Collaborative Care. Methods Inf. Med. 42, 203–211 (2003)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Thomasma, D.C.: Applying General Medical Knowledge to Individuals: A Philosophical Analysis. Theor. Med. 9, 187–200 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Trier, M., Müller, M.: Towards a Systematic Approach for Capturing Knowledge-Intensive Business Processes. In: Karagiannis, D., Reimer, U. (eds.) PAKM 2004. LNCS, vol. 3336, pp. 239–250. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Unified Medical Language System, http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/
  22. 22.
    WHO International Classification of Diseases, http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Danny Ammon
    • 1
  • Dirk Hoffmann
    • 2
  • Tobias Jakob
    • 2
  • Ekkehard Finkeissen
    • 2
  • Vesko Detschew
    • 1
  • Thomas Wetter
    • 3
  1. 1.Technische Universität IlmenauIlmenauGermany
  2. 2.medrapid GmbHHeidelbergGermany
  3. 3.Universitätsklinkum HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany

Personalised recommendations