Advertisement

On the Architecture of Pāṇini’s Grammar

  • Paul Kiparsky
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5402)

Abstract

The descriptive technique of Pāṇini’s Aṣṭ ādhyā has deeply influenced modern linguistic theory and practice. But Pāṇini had no predetermined “theory of grammar”. The rich array of formal devices and categories of his analysis emerge from nothing more than rigorously making it as short as possible. I review the overall organization of his grammar, the types of rules and the categories that they apply to, and the principles which govern their application and interaction in the system. I present in outline Pāṇini’s treatment of the major topics of Sanskrit grammar: syntax, word-formation (primary and secondary derivation, compounding), nominal and verbal inflection, and phonology. The analysis reveals that central aspects of what linguistics ascribes to Universal Grammmar, including levels of representation, thematic roles, and rule ordering, are motivated within the Aṣṭ ādhyā merely by the goal of achieving maximum compression. This finding is itself of considerable theoretical interest.

Keywords

Pāṇini Sanskrit grammar syntax morphology phonology simplicity thematic roles levels of representation rule ordering 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bronkhorst, J.: The role of meanings in Pāṇini’s grammar. Indian Linguistics 40, 146–157 (1979)Google Scholar
  2. Bronkhorst, J.: Asiddha in the Aṣṭādhyāyī: a misunderstanding among the traditional commentators? Journal of Indian Philosophy 8, 69–85 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Deo, A.: Derivational morphology in inheritance-based lexica: Insights from Pāṇini. Lingua 117, 175–201 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fong, V.: The order of things: what directional locatives denote. Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University (1997)Google Scholar
  5. Houben, J.: ‘Meaning statements’ in Pāṇini’s grammar: on the purpose and context of the Aṣṭādhyāyī. Studien zur Indologie und Iranistik 22, 23–54 (1999)Google Scholar
  6. Joshi, S.D.: The functions of asiddhatva and sthānivadbhāva in Pāṇini’s Aṣṭādhyāyī. C.A.S.S. Studies 6, 153–168 (1982)Google Scholar
  7. Joshi, S.D., Bhate, S.: Fundamentals of Anuvṛtti. Poona University Press, Poona (1984)Google Scholar
  8. Joshi, S.D., Kiparsky, P.: Siddha and asiddha in Paninian Phonology. In: Dinnsen, D. (ed.) Current Approaches to Phonological Theory. IU Press, Bloomington (1979)Google Scholar
  9. Joshi, S.D., Roodbergen, J.A.F.: Patañjali’s Vyākaraṇa-Mahābhāṣya, Kārakāhnika. University of Poona, Poona (1980)Google Scholar
  10. Kiparsky, P., Staal, F.: Syntactic and semantic relations in Pāṇini. Foundations of Language 5, 83–117 (1969)Google Scholar
  11. Kiparsky, P.: Pāṇini as a Variationist. Poona University Press/MIT Press, Poona/Cambridge (1979)Google Scholar
  12. Kiparsky, P.: Some Theoretical Problems in Panini’s Grammar. Professor K. V. Abhyankar Memorial Lectures, Second Series. Post-graduate and Research Department Series No. 16, Poona (1982)Google Scholar
  13. Ostler, N.: Case-Linking: a theory of case and verb diathesis applied to Classical Sanskrit. PhD Thesis, MIT (1979)Google Scholar
  14. Subrahmanyam, P.S.: Pāṇinian linguistics. Tokyo (1999)Google Scholar
  15. Stump, G.: Inflectional morphology: a theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Talmy, L.: Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science 12, 49–100 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Kiparsky
    • 1
  1. 1.Stanford UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations