Predators in ‘Agri-environmental’ Sweden: Rural Heritage and Resistance Against Wolf Propagation

  • Annelie Sjölander-LindqvistEmail author
Part of the Environmental Earth Sciences book series (EESCI)


The politics and the underlying reasons for the recuperation of a Scandinavian wolf population are increasingly contested. According to the official policy, wolves shall be guaranteed place in the Swedish fauna. The conflict regarding whether Sweden should host a wolf population polarises between on the one hand, views and understandings as regards biodiversity and sustainable development, and on the other hand, perspectives expressing that local traditions and livelihoods are at stake as a result of wolf occurrence in the landscape. The diverging environmental imaginaries at play in the debate can be seen as constitutive of spatial indifferences. States’ and nature conservation organisations’ desires to implement measures understood to provide conditions for the survival of the wolf are counterbalanced by local actions groups and community residents who struggle to maintain the conditions for the conservation of summer pasturing agriculture, continued and unchanged opportunities to perform hunting with sporting dogs and other recreational activities such as mushrooming and the picking of berries. Considered not only by themselves as of high natural and cultural value, the European Union like wisely appoint that small-scale ways of farming are important to maintain for the upkeep of the landscape and the promotion of conditions guarding the survival of the values associated with these ‘agri-environmental’ habitats.


Agricultural policy Environmental policy Wolf population 


  1. 1.
    Appadurai A (1995) The production of locality. In: Fardon R (ed) Counterworks. Routledge, London and New York, pp 204–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Birdwell-Pheasent D, Lawrence-Zúñiga D (1999) House life: Space, place and family in Europe. Berg, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boholm A (1983) Swedish Kinship: An exploration into cultural precesses of belonging and continuity. Gothenburg Studies in Social Authropology 3, Acta Universitatis, GothoburgensisGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cantrill JG, Senecah LS (2001) Using the ‘sense of self-in-place’ construct in the context of environmental policy-making and landscape planning. Environ Sci Policy 4:185–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Casey ES (1996) How to get from space to place in a fairly short stretch of time: Phenomenological prolegomena. In Feld S, Basso K (eds) Senses of place. School of American Research Press, Santa Fe, NM, pp 13–52Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ericsson G, Heberlein TA (2002) Attityder till varg och vargjakt i Sverige. SLU, UppsalaGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ericsson G, Sandström C (2005) Delrapport om svenskars inställning till rovdsjurspolitik och -förvaltning. SLU Umeå/FjällMistra & Umeå universitet/FjällMistra, FjällMistrarapport, Rapport nr: 10, Umeå, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fitchen JM (1989) When toxic chemicals pollute residential environments: The cultural meanings of home and homeownership. Hum Organ 48:313–324Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gärdenfors U (2005) Rödlistade arter i Sverige 2005—The 2005 Red List of Swedish Species. ArtDatabanken. SLU, UppsalaGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grimes M (2005) Democracy’s infrastructure: The role of procedural fairness in fostering consent. Department of Political Science, Göteborg University, GöteborgGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hornborg A (1994) Environmentalism, ethnicity and sacred places: Reflections on modernity, discourse and power. Can Rev Sociol Anthropol 31:245–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ingold T (1993) The temporality of the landscape. World Archaeol 25:152–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liberg O, Andrén H, Pedersen H-C, Sand H, Sejberg D, Wabakken P, Åkesson M, Bensch S (2005) Severe inbreeding depression in a wild wolf (Canis lupus) population. Biol Lett 22:17–20Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lovell N (1998) Locality and belonging. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Löfgren O (1997) Mellanrum: Vita fläckar och svarta hål i storstadens utkant. In: Saltzman K, Svensson B (eds) Moderna landskap. Natur och Kultur, Stockholm, pp 45–69Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mairal Buil G (1996) Social disarticulation and water policy in Aragon. In Second International Conference on Resettlement Issues: Oxford 9–14 September 1996. Refugee Studies Programme, University of Oxford and World Bank. Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mairal Buil G (2004) The invention of a minority: A case from the Aragonese. In: Boholm Å, Löfstedt R (eds) Facility siting: Risk, power and identity in land use planning. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    McCarthy J (2002) First world political ecology: lessons from the wise use movement. Environ Plann A 34:1281–1302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    McCarthy J (2005) Guest editorial. Environ Plann A 37:953–958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nesbitt JT, Daniel W (2001) Conflicting environmental imaginaries and the politics of nature in central appalachia. Geoforum 32:333–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Prop.2000/01:57. Sammanhållen rovdjurspolitik [Coherent Predator Policy]. MiljödepartementetGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Riley RB (1992) Attachment to the ordinary landscape. In: Altman I, Low SM (eds) Human behavior and environment: Advances in theory and research. Place attachment. Plenum Press: New York, pp 13–35Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Robbins P (2002) Obstacles to a first world political ecology? looking near without looking up. Environ Plann A 34:1509–1513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sand H, Wabakken P, Liberg O (2004) Vargens biologi: karaktärer och konsekvenser för små populationer. In: Jansson G, Seiler C, Andrén H (eds) Skogsvilt III. Grimsö forskningsstation, Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet, Riddarhyttan, pp. 58–65Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Saxon JL (1935) Jakt och jägare i gamla tiders Närke [Hunting and hunters in old time Närke]. Saxon & Lindströms Förlag, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schama S (1995) Landscape and memory. Alfred A. Knopf Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Scott JC (1998) Seeing like a state. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sjölander-Lindqvist A (2004a) Local environment at stake: The Hallandsås railway tunnel in a social and cultural context. Human Ecology Division, LundGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sjölander-Lindqvist A (2004b) Vizualising place and belonging: Landscape redefined in a Swedish farming community. In: Boholm Å, Löfstedt R (eds) Facility siting: Risk, power and identity in land-use planning. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sjölander-Lindqvist A (2006) Den är ju inte i fårhagen på studiebesök—om lokala perspektiv och uppfattningar om varg och rovdjursförvaltning. CEFOS, Göteborgs universitet, Rapport 2006:1, GöteborgGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sjölander-Lindqvist A, Serena C (2006) Negotiating ’Dead-end’ Decisions: Organizing REGIONAL Groups in Predatory Animal Issues in Sweden. in New Perspectives on Risk Communication Conference. GöteborgGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Skogen K, Olve K (2003) A wolf at the gate: the anti-carnivore alliance and the symbolic construction of community. Sociol Ruralis 43:309–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Skr.2001/02:173. En samlad naturvårdspolitik. MiljödepartementetGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    SOU 1999:146. Rovdjursutredningen—Slutbetänkande om en sammanhållen rovdjurspolitik. Miljö- och samhällsbyggnadsdepartementetGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wabakken P, Åke A (2006) Ulv i Skandinavia pr. 5 april 2006. Foreløpige konklusjoner for vinteren 2005/2006. Høgskolen i Hedmark, Oppdragsrapport nr. 5Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wilson MA (1997) The wolf in yellow stone: science, symbol, or politics? Deconstructing the conflict between environmentalism and wise use. Soc Nat Res 10:453–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Public Sector Research (CEFOS)Göteborg UniversityGöteborgSweden

Personalised recommendations