Symbiotic Fungi pp 319-336

Part of the Soil Biology book series (SOILBIOL, volume 18) | Cite as

Best Production Practice of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Inoculum

Chapter

Abstract

To create AM inoculum of high quality is still tricky, and requires some theoretical considerations which are not common thinking in the community of mycorrhiza researchers. We exemplarily describe how to design a multi-purpose inoculum and how to produce it on a really large scale (>8 × 109 spores per year). Such an inoculum fulfils the most requirements of customers of a West European inoculum producer. We do not go into too much detail when documenting the biological basics, working hypotheses or procedures chosen. We describe how we do our job, and you might be able to compare it with your method of inoculum production. In case of more interest in the fundamental findings, you should refer to the original literature cited.

References

  1. Allen M (1991) The ecology of mycorrhizae. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, p 180Google Scholar
  2. Alten H, Blal B, Dodd JC, Feldmann F, Vosatka M (2002) Quality control of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculum in Europe. In: Gianinazzi H, Schuepp H, Barea JM, Haselwandter K (eds) Mycorrhiza technology in agriculture: from genes to bioproducts. Birkhäuser, Switzerland, pp 281–296Google Scholar
  3. Azcon R, Ocampo JA (1981) Factors affecting the vesicular arbuscular infection and mycorrhizal dependency of thirteen wheat cultivars. New Phytol 87:677–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bagyaraj DJ (1994) Vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhiza: Application in Agriculture. In: Norris JR, Read DJ, Varma AK (eds) Techniques for the study of mycorrhiza. Academic, London, pp 819–833Google Scholar
  5. Baltruschat H (1993) Zur ökosystemaren Bedeutung der VA-Mykorrhiza in Agrarökosystemen und Möglichkeiten der praktischen Nutzung dieser Symbiose. Habilitation in the FB 17 of the University of Giessen, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  6. Boyetchko SM, Tewari JP (1995) Susceptibility of barley cultivars to vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Can J Plant Sci 75:269–275Google Scholar
  7. Chang DCN (1994) What is the potential for management of VAM in horticulture? In: Robson AD, Abott LK, Malajczuk N (eds) Management of mycorrhizas in agriculture, horticulture and forestry. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 187–190Google Scholar
  8. Dodd JC, Thomson BD (1994) The screening and selection of inoculant arbuscular mycorrhizal and ectomycorrhizal fungi. In: Robson AD, Abott LK, Malajczuk N (eds) Management of mycorrhizas in agriculture, horticulture and forestry. Book Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 149–158Google Scholar
  9. Feldmann F, Idczak E (1994) Inoculum production of VA-mycorrhizal fungi. In: Norris JR, Read DJ, Varma AK (eds) Techniques for mycorrhizal research. Academic, San Diego, pp 799–817Google Scholar
  10. Feldmann F (1998a) Symbiontentechnologie in der Praxis: Arbuskuläre Mykorrhiza im Gartenbau. Thalacker-Medien, Braunschweig, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  11. Feldmann F (1998b) The strain-inherent variability of arbuscular mycorrhizal effectiveness: II. Effectiveness of single spores. Symbiosis 25:131–143Google Scholar
  12. Feldmann F (2007) The concept of best agricultural practice. Personally published, ISBN: 978-3-00-021432-5, pp 42Google Scholar
  13. Feldmann F, Grotkass C (2002) Directed inoculum production — shall we be able to design AMF populations to achieve predictable symbiotic effectiveness? In: Gianinazzi H, Schuepp H, Barea JM, Haselwandter K (eds) Mycorrhiza technology in agriculture: from genes to bioproducts. Birkhäuser, Switzerland, pp 261–279Google Scholar
  14. Feldmann F, Kruse W, Boyle C, Lieberei R (1998) The strain-inherent variability of arbuscular mycorrhizal effectiveness: I. Development of a test system using Petroselinum crispum as Host. Symbiosis 25:115–129Google Scholar
  15. Feldmann F, Hutter I, Niemann P, Weritz J, Grotkass C, Boyle C (1999) Einbindung der Mykorrhizatechnologie in die Heil- und Zierpflanzenproduktion sowie den Endverkauf. Mitt Biol Bundesanst 363:6–38.Google Scholar
  16. Genre A, Bonfante P (1997) A mycorrhizal fungus changes microtubule orientation in tobacco root cells. Protoplasma 199:30–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gallotte A, Gianinazzi Pearson V, Giovanetti M, Sbrana C, Avio L, Gianinazzi S (1993) Cellular localization and cytochemical probing of resistance reactions to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi a “locus a” myc negative mutant of Pisum sativum L. Planta (Heidelberg) 191:112–122Google Scholar
  18. Johnson NC, Graham JH, Smith FA (1997) Functioning and mycorrhizal associations along the mutualism-parasitism continuum. New Phytol 135:575–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Krishna KR, Shetty KG, Dart PJ, Andrews DJ (1985) Genotype-dependent variation in mycorrhizal colonization and response to inoculation of pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum). Plant Soil 86:113–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lackie SM, Bowley SR, Peterson RL (1988) Comparison of colonization among half-sib families of Medicago sativa L. by Glomus versiforme (Daniels and Trappe) Berch. New Phytol 108:477–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lingua G, Sgorbati S, Citterio A, Fusconi A, Trotta A, Gnavi E, Berta G (1999) Arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization delays nucleus senescence in leek root cortical cells. New Phytol 141:161–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Miller JC, Rajzpakse S, Garber RK (1986) VAM in vegetable crops. Hortic Sci 21:974–984Google Scholar
  23. Nemec S (1987) VAM in horticultural systems. In: Safir SR (ed) Ecophysiology of VAM plants. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 193–221Google Scholar
  24. Peterson RL, Bonfante P (1994) Comparative structure of vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizas and ectomycorrhizas. Plant Soil 159:79–88Google Scholar
  25. Schenck N.C. (1984). Methods and principles of mycorrhizal research. Am Phytopathol Soc, St. Paul, Minnesota, p 244Google Scholar
  26. Sieverding E. (1991). Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza management in tropical ecosystems. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit, EschbornGoogle Scholar
  27. Stocker O (1947) Probleme der pflanzlichen Dürreresistenz. Naturwissenschaften 34:362–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tewari L, Johri BN, Tandon SM (1993) Host genotype dependency and growth enhancing ability of VA-mycorrhizal fungi for Eleusine coracana (finger millet). World J Microbiol Biotechnol 9:191–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Thompson JP (1994) What is the potential for management of mycorrhizas in agriculture? In: Robson AD, Abott LK, Malajczuk N (eds) Management of mycorrhizas in agriculture, horticulture and forestry. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 191–200Google Scholar
  30. Tommerup IC (1988) Long-term preservation by L-drying and storage of vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Trans Br Mycol Soc 90:585–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Varma A, Schuepp H (1994) Infectivity and effectiveness of Glomus intraradices on micropropagated plants. Mycorrhiza 5:29–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Weissenhorn I, Feldmann F (1999) Perspektiven der Nutzung der arbuskulären Mykorrhiza im niederländischen Gartenbau unter Glas. Mitteilungen der Biologischen Bundesanstalt 363:65–73Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Falko Feldmann
    • 1
  • Imke Hutter
    • 2
  • Carolin Schneider
    • 2
  1. 1.Julius-Kühn-InstitutBraunschweigGermany
  2. 2.Institut für PflanzenkulturSchnegaGermany

Personalised recommendations