Skip to main content

National Antarctic Programs and Their Impact on the Environment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Health of Antarctic Wildlife

Abstract

This chapter describes the nature and scope of government operations in the Antarctic, touching briefly on the sub-Antarctic islands and also on the growing non-government tourism industry. Its aim is to provide the context for estimating the overall size and impression of the human footprint (i.e. the spatial extent of disturbance) and the degree to which human activity might pose a risk to the health of Antarctic wildlife. The consequences of the introduction and/or spread of disease, which is the subject of several other chapters in this book, largely depend on the nature of those activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ATCM (2006) Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting XXIX Final Report, paragraph 73. Available at Antarctic Treaty Secretariat website for ATCM XXVIII: www.ats.aq/28atcm (accessed 25.02.09).

  • ATS (2009) Antarctic Treaty Secretariat website: www.ats.aq (accessed 24.02.09)

  • Beck P (1986) The international politics of Antarctica. Croom Helm, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks S (2009) Developing a Standardised Approach to Measuring the Environmental Impact Footprint of Antarctic Research Stations, Unpublished Honours Thesis, Institute of Antarctic & Southern Ocean Studies, University of Tasmania.

    Google Scholar 

  • COMNAP (2009) Council of Managers of National Antarctic Programs website: www.comnap.aq/operations/facilities (information current as of 25.02.09)

  • Convey P, Frenot Y, Gremmen N, Bergstrom DM, (2006) Biological invasions. In: Bergstrom DM, Convey P, Huiskes AHL (ed) Antarctic terrestrial and limnetic ecosystems: Antarctica as a global indicator. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 191–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis BW (1990) Science and politics in Antarctic and Southern Oceans policy: a critical assessment. In: Herr RA, Hall HR, Haward MG (eds) Antarctica’s future: continuity or change? Australian Institute of International Affairs, Tasmanian Government Printer, Hobart, p 39

    Google Scholar 

  • EPBC Regulations (2000) Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Regulations 2000 (Commonwealth of Australia) Schedule 5 – Australian World Heritage management principles (Regulation 10.01)

    Google Scholar 

  • Frenot Y (2006) Human use: current use and activities: research. Presentation to International Forum on the Sub-Antarctic, Hobart, Tasmania, 6–7 July 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • IAATO (2009) International Association of Antarctica Tour Operators, Tourism Statistics, ‘2007-2008 Tourism Summary’ available online at: www.iaato.org/tourism_stats.html (accessed 25.02.09)

  • Inspection Report 1 (2005) Australian Government Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade and Department of the Environment and Heritage, Antarctic Treaty Australian Observer Team 2005, Scott Base and McMurdo Station

    Google Scholar 

  • Inspection Report 2 (2005) Report by Foreign and Commonwealth Office, London, UK; Australian Antarctic Division, Kingston, Tasmania, Australia; and Instituto Antártico Peruano, Lima, Perú. Working Paper 32, ATCM XXVIII 2005. Report of Joint Inspections under Article VII of the Antarctic Treaty and Article 14 of the Environmental Protocol. Available at Antarctic Treaty Secretariat website for ATCM XXVIII: www.ats.aq/28atcm/buscador.php?pagina=3& (accessed 20 July 2006)

  • Murray C (2005) Mapping Terra Incognita. Polar Rec 41(2):103–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poland JS, Riddle MJ, Zeeb BA (2003) Contaminants in the Arctic and the Antarctic: a comparison of sources, impacts, and remediation options. Polar Rec 39:369–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel M, Rees W (1996) Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth. New Society, Gabriola Island, British Colombia

    Google Scholar 

  • UK (2006) Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting XXIX, Working Paper 1 ‘Report of the CEP Intersessional Contact Group on Site Guidelines for Visitors to Antarctica’ submitted by the United Kingdom, available at Antarctic Treaty Secretariat website: www.ats.aq (accessed 24.02.09)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Jabour .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jabour, J. (2009). National Antarctic Programs and Their Impact on the Environment. In: Kerry, K.R., Riddle, M. (eds) Health of Antarctic Wildlife. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-93923-8_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics