Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Design Requirements Engineering: A Ten-Year Perspective pp 305–326Cite as

Exploring the Fitness Relationship between System Functionality and Business Needs

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 14))

Abstract

Fitting information systems to business needs is considered equally important by both, the Requirements Engineering and MIS communities. Even though alignment/fit clearly appears as desirable, a number of issues still remain unsolved as for example: (i) the achievement of alignment (ii) its management over time, (iii) the identification of non fit and, (iv) its evaluation. This paper gives to fitness a central position and introduces the notion of a fitness relationship and its measurement. In doing so, this paper tackles the social context and requirements intertwining as pointed out in the book framework. It highlights two sets of issues, one involved in understanding this relationship and the second in engineering it. It also points out broad directions and trends in resolving these issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Potts, C.: Fitness for use: The system quality that matters most. In: 3rd International Workshop on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Luftman, J., Maclean, E.R.: Key issues for it executives. MIS Quarterly Executive 3, 89–104 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Reich, B.H., Nelson, K.M.: In their own words: Cio visions about the future of in-house it organizations. The DATA BASE for Advances in ISs 34, 28–44 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tallon, P., Kraemer, K.L.: Executives Perspectives on IT: Unraveling the Link between Business Strategy, Management Practices and IT Business Value (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Watson, R.T., Kelly, G.G., Galliers, R.D., Brancheau, J.: Key issues in iss management: an int. perspective. Journal of Management ISs 13, 91–115 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brancheau, J.C., Janz, B.D., Wetherbe, J.C.: Key issues in information systems management: 1994-1995 sim delphi results. MIS Quarterly 20(2), 225–242 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chan, Y.E., Huff, S.L., Copeland, D.G., Barclay, D.W.: Business strategic orientation, ISs strategic orientation and strategic alignment. ISs Research 8(2), 125–150 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kefi, H., Kalika, M.: Survey of strategic alignment impacts on organizational performance in international european companies. In: 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chan, Y.E.: Why haven’t we mastered alignment? the importance of the informal organization structure. MIS Quarterly Executive 1(2), 97–112 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sabherwal, R., Chan, Y.E.: Alignment between business and is strategies: A study of prospectors, analyzers and defenders. ISs Research 12(1), 11–33 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Croteau, A.M., Bergeron, F.: An information technology trilogy: business strategy, technological deployment and organizational performance. Journal of Strategic IS 10, 77–99 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hirschheim, R., Sabherwal, R.: Detours in the Path toward Strategic Information Systems Alignment. California Management Review 44(1), 87–108

    Google Scholar 

  13. Soffer, P.: Fit measurement: How to distinguish between fit and misfit. In: Persson, A., Stirna, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3084, pp. 253–254. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Arsanjani, A., Alpigini, J.: Using grammar-oriented object design to seamlessly map business models to component-based software architectures. In: Symposium of Modelling and Simulation, pp. 186–191 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Alves, C., Finkelstein, A.: Challenges in cots decision-making: a goal-driven requirements engineering perspective. In: Workshop on Software Engineering Decision Support in conjunction with SEKE 2002, pp. 789–794 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rolland, C.: Capturing intentionality with maps. In: Krogstie, J., Opdahl, A.L., Brinkkemper, S. (eds.) Conceptual modelling in information system engineering. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rolland, C., Prakash, N.: Matching erp system functionality to customer requirements. In: 5th IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, pp. 66–75. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Regev, G., Wegmann, A.: Remaining fit: On the creation and maintenance of fit. In: Persson, A., Stirna, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3084, pp. 131–137. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nadler, D., Tushman, M.L.: A congruence Model for Diagnosing Organizational Behavior. In: Miles, R. (ed.) Resource Book in Macro Organizational Bahavior, pp. 30–49 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Clarke, S., Harrison, W., Ossher, H., Tarr, P.: Subject-oriented design: Towards improved alignment of requirements, design and code. In: Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages and Applications (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pohl, K., Jacobs, S.: Oncurrent engineering: Enabling traceability and mutual understanding. Journal of Concurrent Engineering Research and Application, Special Issue on Concurrent Engineering and Artificial Intelligence 2(4), 279–290 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  22. De Landtsheer, R., Letier, E., van Lamsweerde, A.: Deriving tabular event-based specifications from goal-oriented requirements models. In: 11th IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering, p. 200. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Krishna, A., Ghose, A.K., Vilkomir, S.A.: Co-evolution of complementary formal and informal requirements. In: 7th International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution in conjonction with IWPSE 2004, pp. 159–164. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Etien, A., Rolland, C.: Measuring the fitness relationship. Requirements Engineering Journal 10(3), 184–197 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bodhuin, T., Esposito, R., Pacelli, C., Tortorella, M.: Impact analysis for supporting the co-evolution of business processes and supporting software systems. In: BPMDS Workshop in connection with The 16th Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, pp. 146–150 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Soffer, P., Wand, Y.: Goal-driven analysis of process model validity. In: Persson, A., Stirna, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3084, pp. 521–535. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wand, Y., Weber, R.: An ontological model of an information system. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 16(11), 1282–1292 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cavano, J., McCall, J.: A framework for the measurement of software quality. In: Software Quality and Assurance Workshop, ACM SIGMETRICS and SIG-SOFT, pp. 133–139 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sysml, http://www.sysml.org

  30. Etien, A., Rolland, C.: A process for generating fitness measures. In: Pastor, Ó., Falcão e Cunha, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3520, pp. 277–292. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Thevenet, L.H., Salinesi, C.: Aligning is to organization’s strategy: The InStAlMethod. In: Krogstie, J., Opdahl, A.L., Sindre, G. (eds.) CAiSE 2007 and WES 2007. LNCS, vol. 4495, pp. 203–217. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Potts, C., Hsi, I.: Abstraction and context in requirements engineering: Toward a synthesis. Annals of Software Engineering 3, 23–61 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Weidenhaupt, K., Pohl, K., Jarke, M., Haumer, P.: CREWS Team. Scenario Usage in System Development: a Report on Current Practice. In: 3rd International Conference on Requirements Engineering (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Cockburn, A.: Writing Effective Use Cases. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ben Achour, C.: Extraction des Besoins par Analyse de Scénarios Textuels. Phd Thesis, Univ. Paris 6 - Pierre et Marie Curie (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kamsties, E., von Knethen, A., Reussner, R.: A Controlled Experiment on the Understandability of Different Requirements Specifications Styles. In: 8th International Workshop on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Salinesi, C., Rolland, C.: Fitting business models to system functionality exploring the fitness relationship. In: Eder, J., Missikoff, M. (eds.) CAiSE 2003. LNCS, vol. 2681, pp. 647–664. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Rolland, C., Grosz, G., Kla, R.: Experience with goal-scenario coupling in requirements engineering. In: 4th IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, p. 74. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rolland, C., Salinesi, C., Etien, A.: Eliciting gaps in requirements change. Requirement Engineering Journal 9(1), 1–15 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Rolland, C.: Aligning Business and System Functionality Through Model Matching, Systèmes dInformation et Management (SIM). Editions ESKA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Jackson, M.: Software Requirements and Specifications. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Prechelt, L., Mahpohl, G., Phlippsen, M.: Jplag. finding plagiarisms among a set of programs. Technical Report 2000-1, Universität Karlsruhe (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Sarireta, A., Vaucher, J.: Similarity measure in the object model. In: Aksit, M., Matsuoka, S. (eds.) ECOOP 1997. LNCS, vol. 1241. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Blok, M.C., Cybulski, J.L.: Reusing uml specifications in a constrained application domain. In: 5th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference, pp. 196–202. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Delgado, C., Samos, J., Torres, M.: Primitive operations for schema evolution in ODMG databases. In: Konstantas, D., Léonard, M., Pigneur, Y., Patel, S. (eds.) OOIS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2817, pp. 226–237. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lautemann, S.E.: Schema versions in object-oriented database systems. In: 5th International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications, pp. 323–332. World Scientific, Singapore (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Banerjee, J., Kim, W., Kim, H.J., Korth, H.F.: Semantics and implementation of schema evolution in object-oriented databases. In: Association for Computing Machinery Special Interest Group on Management of Data 1987 Annual Conference, pp. 311–322. ACM Press, New York (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Casati, F., Ceri, S., Pernici, B., Pozzi, G.: Workflow evolution. In: Thalheim, B. (ed.) ER 1996. LNCS, vol. 1157, pp. 438–455. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  49. Kradolfer, M.: A Workflow Metamodel Supporting Dynamic, Reuse-based Model Evolution. Ph.d. thesis, Department of Information Technology, University of Zurich (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Reichert, M., Rinderle, S., Dadam, P.: A Formal Framework For Workflow Type And Instance Changes Under Correctness Constraints (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Salinesi, C., Etien, A., Zoukar, I.: A systematic approach to express is evolution requirements using gap modelling and similarity modelling techniques. In: Persson, A., Stirna, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3084, pp. 338–352. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Lehman, M.M., Ramil, J.F., Kahen, G.: Evolution as a noun and evolution as a verb. In: Workshop on Software and Organisation Co-evolution (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Mitleton-Kelly, E., Papaefthimiou, M.C.: Co-evolution & an enabling infrastructure: a solution to legacy? In: Systems engineering for business process change. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Kardasis, P., Loucopoulos, P.: Aligning legacy information systems to business processes. In: Pernici, B., Thanos, C. (eds.) CAiSE 1998. LNCS, vol. 1413, pp. 25–39. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  55. Etien, A., Rolland, C., Salinesi, C.: Measuring the business/system alignment. In: Requirements Engineering for Business Need and IT Alignment (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Université Paris1 Panthéon Sorbonne, 90 rue de Tolbiac, 75013, Paris, France

    Colette Rolland

Authors
  1. Colette Rolland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA

    Kalle Lyytinen

  2. Loughborough University, UK

    Pericles Loucopoulos

  3. University of Toronto, ON, Canada

    John Mylopoulos

  4. Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA

    Bill Robinson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rolland, C. (2009). Exploring the Fitness Relationship between System Functionality and Business Needs. In: Lyytinen, K., Loucopoulos, P., Mylopoulos, J., Robinson, B. (eds) Design Requirements Engineering: A Ten-Year Perspective. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 14. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92966-6_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92966-6_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-92965-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-92966-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation